Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: images(2).jpg (8KB, 278x181px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 278x181px
I just finished Lord of the rings two towers and watching return of the king next. So far rewatching these has made me miss the "real" aspect of it -minimal cgi, real sets, real places, real actors playing orcs. It makes the movie age much better when the fight against an orc is a a real person getting hit with a sword. Is this a lost form? Will we ever get a good fantasy film not filled with shit loads of cgi again ?
>>
Watching it reminds me that there was a time when niggers weren't haphazardly shoved into every movie regardless of place and time period.
>>
>>87306838
That's also true. The world feels real, the accents are mostly great and the cast was appropriately placed. There isn't a bunch of obvious "fill ins" for quota purposes
>>
>>87306795
Um LOTR had tons of CGI. Granted it also had tons of practical sets/effects as well.
What you probably mean is most shots didn't fixate on CGI elements, other than Gollum.
>>
>>87308393
I think he means cgi was only used when necessary (dragons, volcano explosion, etc).
>>
>>87309138
This is what I meant. We don't need cgi horse riding and cgi orcs , so we didnt. We also didn't need cgi backdrops constantly (although obviously there was still some) - unlike the hobbit.
>>
>>87306795
We're getting it with Game of Thrones only better. So it's not a lost art form.
Movies inside of Hollywood are dead tho. TV is the future.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1