>literally mentally ill >given millions to make his "art"

>literally mentally ill
>parents pay him to live in the basement and shitpost all day
>still has shit taste
>kek

>>87294219
What do you expect from a tv show director

>>87294160
lol

>>87294342
/thread

>>87294757
this is bait

>>87294219
>everybody expects a sequel for a popular tv show that mixed typical soap opera elements with random shit
>give them a full inland empire kind of bullshit

gotta admit he has balls

>no set design, feels empty and lifeless
>no interesting ideas for storylines and generally bad writing
>relies on gimmicks only instead
>those are unoriginal or just bad, unfortunately ("fuck you, albert", glove, andy and lucy, coordinates, riddles, ...)
>bad acting (Bell, Lynch, Horse, Robertson, Dern, ...)
>dull characters (one-dimensional at best)
>storylines and characters are introduced for no purpose
>everything is supposed to weirdly connect and make sense
>shot in digital in a way that doesn't compensate for the technology's disadvantages (looks bad)
>roadhouse scenes (out of place, badly shot, the songs, the bands, the extras, ...)
>student-tier storytelling/editing (characters are shown walking up complete sets of stairs)
>stretched out needlessly, long takes have no particular effect
>everything above is literally cringe-tier in concept and implementation
>obviously delusional and/or inexperienced fanbase perceiving it as particularly meaningful, complex or "deep"
>can't compare to the original series that doesn't have those problems (coherent/complex and beautiful sets, costumes and make-up/well shot/well acted/well written/magnificent multi-dimensional characters and character relations, music, storylines and gimmicks/creates a unique athmosphere as a result, changing the world of television forever whereas "the return" neither manages to do something established really good nor to invent something new)
>somehow the best thing in tv history

>>87294938
only casual cancer trendhopping tourist artkillers didn't expect that second part. i love their tears.

>>87294219
His films and the original series are good. The new series is unquestionably shit part in due to his old age.

I can't stand this fucking hack

>>87294854
Nice bait

>>87295013
What's with the stairs?

>>87295013
/tv/ cannot detect good acting or kino anything they like is shit of course twin peaks is

only guests from /r/twinpeaks defend this show here.

>ALTERNATIVE UNIVERSE
>IT WAS ALL JUST A DREAM

>>87295223
LYNCHED

>>87295223
but then where is that anon you're replying to from?

>>87295492
Believe it or not, there are better messageboards for discussing film on the internet. I am from one of those messageboards.

t. that anon

>>87295556
just say reddit roleplayer

>>87294342

What I'm all of the above but still love Lynch?

>>87295579
Reddit is complete and utter shit. Actually not LARPing.

>>87295615
there's no backpedaling from kino usage memer, you're too dumb and new to not even know this already

Frosting take me down
Lynching take me down with you

For the last time
For the last time
For the last time
For the last time

You're in front of your TV set
I'm standing in the director's seat
Still thinking that I hear your voice
Can you hear me?
Can you hear me?
Can you hear me?
Can you hear me?

For the last time
For the last time
For the last time
For the last time

At night I'm driving in your car
Pretending that we'll leave this town
We're watching all the street lights fade
And now you're just a stranger's dream
I took your picture from the frame
And now you're nothing like you seem
Your shadow fell like last night's rain

>>87295701
Sorry, what is "kino usage memer"? Or is it "kino usage", "memer? Please explain.

>>87295794
ask reddit if you find yourself dumbfounded memer

>>87295826
wtf

>>87295826
You should apologize to this poster

>>87295013
Wow you're one of those 'Breaking Bad is art' and 'Game of Thrones is good' fags. You give off an almost cute impression whenever you try to sum up your opinion.

>>87296298
I'm none of those. Why do you think that? Why don't you address my points? Also, thanks?

File: 1499160350714.jpg (33KB, 453x500px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 453x500px

>>87294219
>he doesnt care about (you)
>he'll never even know (you) exist

in what way is David lynch mentally ill?

>>87295701
I used kino not that anon you autistic meme hating fagboi

>>87296503
why should we believe you aren't samefagging buddy?

>>87296986
why not?

>>87297404
coz youre a mope

>>87297634
no

>>87297700
k

>>87297724
what a faggot

>>87297776
no u mope

>>87297800
nah.

you fucking normies are so fucking LYNCHED

>>87294219
>ctrl + F
>LYNCHED
>only 2 results
Step your fucking game up, everyone

File: 1497630271230.jpg (24KB, 640x468px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 640x468px

>>87294219
L Y N C H E D

>>87295013
>no set design, feels empty and lifeless
Lynch creates many of the odd furniture in his workshop. Are you fucking kidding??

>no interesting ideas for storylines and generally bad writing
define interesting, you overchallanged normie-fag

>relies on gimmicks
normie-faggot confirmed

>those are unoriginal or just bad, unfortunately ("fuck you, albert", glove, andy and lucy, coordinates, riddles, ...)
misunderstanding caricature-esque characters for gimmicks, bc too stupid to get the joke

>dull
same

>introduced for no purpose
blind to the fact that most plotlines merge together in the end

>everything is supposed to weirdly connect and make sense
first denying that happens, than admitting it happens and thinking it's shit ... lmao

>shot in digital in a way that doesn't compensate for the technology's disadvantages (looks bad)
all muh nice 35mm feels! digital is bad boo hoo!

>roadhouse scenes (out of place, badly shot, the songs, the bands, the extras, ...)
not a single arguments holds true here / matter of musical taste duh-to-the-fucking-duhuh!

>student-tier storytelling/editing (characters are shown walking up complete sets of stairs)
something tells me you have no idea about student film aesthetic, yet use it as an insult

>stretched out needlessly, long takes have no particular effect
"I dislike the style and slow pace, so it must be bad"

>can't compare to the original series that doesn't have those problems
expecting a seemless, identical way of building the series based on the >25 year old original and disregarding the change in media, storytelling, pace, expectations... lmao!

>particularly meaningful ...
"I don't like surreal stuff and things that leave ideas open to MY imagination! I want CLEAR ANSWERS! This series is shit, bc NO CLEAR ANSWERS!"
Rather, your imagination sucks big time.

>compare to original
lmao rofl

>somehow the best thing in tv history
somehow, you don't get to decide and therefore act butthurt

>>87298007
autism

>>87298007
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-deception

I like surreal stuff. But I also know surreal film besides David Lynch. I also know films that did a lot of the things David Lynch did in "The Return" more than 25 years ago. I consider your other points addressed with the link above.

>>87298007
nice job addressing those points, especially the last one. lynched-fags don't want to accept the obvious, no use keeping trying to help

>>87298198

All your arguments can be narrowed down to the fact that you don't particularly like this kind of approach. That is personal taste. You can watch you GoT, Breaking Bad, Desperate Housewives and be happy. No need to roam in more challanging storylines that make your poor brain hurt.

>>87295013
This is all correct but I find it strangely charming, and one of the most memorable seasons of anything I've seen

>>87298300
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-deception

You're just wrong. Why would you need to tell me to watch those shows? I think I made it pretty clear that I don't like any of those.

Again, I'm only trying to help. I wish it was only personal taste. Read again. Watch again. Just trying to counter the massive self delusion that is going on. I don't have any problem with Inland Empire or even More things that happened or any of Lynch's previous works, by the way.

>>87298417
>liking s3
>supporting anti-s3ists
doesn't compute

>>87298490
He's right about everything, it was an incoherent mess with shitty CGI but it was also one of the best things I've seen in years.

>dude magic lmao

How can anyone watch any show that does this ? What's the point of having a plot if half of the key events are explained by magical thinking ? Would the breaking bad finale be anything other than shit if Walt just used magic to go back in time and kill x character and do other magical stuff to solve his problems ?

>>87298490
LOL

>>87298519
how can he be right about everyhting-that's taste..

File: hgf.jpg (137KB, 867x529px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 867x529px

Open yourself up bro, there's a lot in life that doesn't have a 3 act structure or pay off or resolution or make sense. The real question is why are normal shows formulaic and bland, I can't even watch tv anymore cause its the same shit.

>>87298439

Your self-deception argument can be applied to everything in the world. You can argue that anything you like is a way of tricking yourself or reading "too much" into something. Liking Hans Christian Andersons fairy tales can be self deception and countered with "it is all bullshit for the sake of telling a story".

On a very generalized level, there is way to much numerology in TP reaching especially from FWWM into S3. The electricity posts, the coordinates, the machine that spits out good Cooper, the hints from the Giant ... way too much numerology. But then again, most of it is resolved by the finale.

You are simply left with a very very open ending that will haunt you for several days or weeks, subconsciously or consciously. Some people, maybe you included, don't like to be left with unanswered events, same as most people are scared of the silhouette of a figure in the dark and not knowing who it is before he/she disappears. That is human nature. At the same time, that's the thrill of it.

You can't claim all the questions raised by the mystery by saying, it's all bullshit, because it falls back on you. YOU are too lazy to make up your own mind.

There are truly pretentious films like "The science of sleep".

>>87298622
Taste is objective, bro. Get over it. Some better, some worse.

>>87298549
the bb finale is already shit

>>87294938
But most people appreciate it, right? Or is it just his fans? I don't follow tv shows

>>87298645
Look. That's very easy to counter. You could argue it fits your taste what most other humans perceive as unpleasant. You can argue for any kind of bad art by saying it doesn't conform to dogma.

I wouldn't go so far as to saying taste is objective. Some of my points are even exagerrated like the digital camera one. I don't like it but there is nothing objectively wrong with it. I just think it would look much better shot on specific kinds of film or even if more work went into the digital. I didn't even mention anything I didn't like very much. The logos and fonts could've been smoother for example. But there is definetely some substance lacking and I want to encourage people to not eat it up without looking again.

>>87298776
everything not anything. sorry

>>87298670
BB ending is good, and has a magical aspect to it

File: AEECC094-9301-4D9D-8D47-7F54B386974C-1664-0000018B4598D3E6.jpg (119KB, 945x800px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 945x800px

>>87298007
Laughing at something isnt an argument

>>87294219
Fact: if literally any other director pulled that shit /tv/ would be clowning that director nonstop. Everybody would. But because it's BASED LYNCH xD U GOT LYNCH'D LMAO XD he gets a pass. Yawn. Lynch and all his sycophant ball washers are pretentious faggots.

>>87298852
is calling someone a faggot?

>>87298977
no you idiot, he made his argument in the post

>>87298776
The entire approach to the series was changed.
What you are getting at is criticizing details of his working method.

In that, you sound very much like the old fans of NiN, attacking Reznor for having recovered, being in a relationship and therefore not feeling as miserable (as they still do and) as he was during Fragile tour and all that.

Artists change overtime and expecting them to keep a certain level of quality, keeping their style exactly the way they had several years ago, negates the fact that people and artists alike change and have their work evolve.

The entire red room in S3 feels very different from the scenes in S1, S2 and FWWM. There are subtle and obvious changes in how it was presented and of course that doesn't line up with how it was presented before. These are things you need to take into account.

Personal taste is a key element in evaluating if something rings with you. You react to symbolism that reminds you of something of your own past, so if you are left with hardly any connection with what happens in a series (pain, sorrow, deceit, love) the way it is presented in particular, you have very little emotional connection to it. Also, if something is presented in a pretentious way (like the movie "The science of sleep"), it kills the mood.

>>87298852
You can rightfully laugh at people from the flat earth movement for claiming complete, utter bullshit. Same goes for the things I love at from this guy
>>87295013

>>87299032
>Same goes for the things I love at from this guy
freudian or not, i meant "laugh at"

>>87298549
Depends how magic is used. One hundred years of solitude did it well

>>87296298
One of those sight and sound fags actually. Get reckdd noob

>>87298968
This. Lynch is and always will be a mentally hack who makes non-sense that people overanalyze. It's like modern '''art''' which is why so many sub-human leftists enjoy his films. You won't ever see a hard working conservative enjoying this garbage ever. They call it for this: non-sense leftist garbage full of confusion just like their retarded worldview and lives.

>inb4 lynched xD xD

>>87298519
I agree.
There were a ton of flaws (objective flaws; wtf was the point of "Red"? the Audrey stuff wasn't good or interesting or coherent)
but I still had a great time overall.
It's so interesting and original and unique at certain times, that I don't care about how flawed it was at times.

They mention Annie only once in passing. It's inexplicable and an inexcusable oversight (and I don't even like the character that much).
Then Coop spends the last two episodes romanticizing Diane, when it should have been Audrey or Annie or someone who mattered more.

It doesn't matter because Ep 17 was incredibly unique and interesting otherwise.

>>87299207
what it is*

>>87299032
>>87299032
I'm not comparing the original series to "The Return", I'm pointing out what's wrong with S3 by saying what S1 excelled in. I would have liked a completely new direction. I.e. not a coffe and pie-fag. Also, I don't want sound like I need a well developed plot or gimmicks or something. A good film can do without any of that. But Lynch used and still uses plot and plot gimmicks, always longed for and was about great ideas. Delivered for years. I just don't think there are a lot of good ideas in S3. Even if I liked the manlet stabbing people to bland old-school hip-hop beats, if the film or series doesn't deliver continuously or I cringe often throughout I won't say I like it. If there's something I really like followed multiple things I also like very much, that blows my mind. Some of Lynch's previous works actually delivered on that.

>>87299262
Sorry, this was not a very good post. I'll try to do better next time.

>>87299262

See, you admit it yourself. It boils down to mere preferences and "liking something". You seem to enjoy the violence with the odd HipHop jingle in conjunction. That was a gimmick just as anything else.

I for my part enjoyed the weird effects that obviously presented a clear statement against fancy, digital effects that cost millions of dollars, yet look like some smooth, blueish, unnatural CGI fest afterall (Avatar and all that shit that tries so freaking hard). I especially enjoyed the weird waves in the sea of the White Lodge and all the other effects (timeline jogging wheel of digital work stations) and I don't know if you are familiar with the work of Guy Maddin, but a lot of the scenes from the first episodes, in particular Dale talking to Naido, reminded me of "Cowards bend their knees" (Guy Maddin), who aims to recreate old film studio effects.

You basically confirm my point that some things ring with you and some things don't. It just so happens that you dislike S3, because very few things actually reached you on an emotional level. Other people have a different experience. That's the whole point of art.

I had my fair share of moments,l which seemed clichéd or weak. I don't particularly like the "We are like the dreamer" phrase, the Monica Belucci joke, the sick girl in the car accident, the weird scene with Rays old relative that he robs with the disabled adult ... but overall, there were a lot of moments that I enjoyed and that still can change overtime as you look back and remember.

>>87299563
What the fuck. Where do you draw the line between things you don't like and things that are bad? My aim was to present arguments not only for why I dislike S3 but also for why you should dislike it, too.

I personally like things that are good and dislike things that are bad and encourage you to do the same.

>>87299788

I haven't read a single argument that I agree with why I should dislike it.

Movies like "The science of sleep" obviously try to reach a level of surrealism, but fail because there is no substance in this game of pretence.

The symbolism in Lynchs work stems from associative thought processes and is based on other art as well as genuinely original ideas. Some guy here pointed out a lot of connections to paintings from René Magritte.

Let me compare that to the difference between a real plant and a plastic plant:
The real one has a smell, it changes the air around it, it is soft and moist to the touch, it lives and changes over time. The plastic plant may look exactly the same on the outside, but it does nothing of the above other than it collects dust. It is shallow.

"The science of sleep" (a film I love to hate for its complete pretentiousness in that respect) is that shallow plastic plant. And, funny enough, there are people who love that kind of plastic.

>>87299819
good summary, troll>>87300043

>>87300043
we have a literal brainlet here lads. the poster you're replying to is probably familiar with the concepts you tried to explain. if you don't understand the concept of bad acting or bad writing even though you know what pretentiousness is you can't be helped because being pretentious and being a caricature of ones old self is exactly what it boils down to you literal retard faggot

File: 1504464271343 Kopie.jpg (572KB, 1000x1879px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 1000x1879px

>>87300070
I messed up that post of mine. Should have been this:

>>87299819
good summary, troll

>>87300043
and here's the Magritte stuff to that post

https://virtualmemorylibrary.wordpress.com/2017/08/21/twin-peaks-symbolen-van-de-tv-wereld/

>>87300314
Don't think I addressed any of the Magritte inspired production design or symbolism. Make of that what you will.

>>87300203
Bit rude but yeah.

>>87300203

How is Lynch a caricature of his old self, while he actively reacted to new media at the fucking age of 70, you dipshit? I'd like to see you still being innovative at that age. In his position, he could have just gone downhill like Orson Welles.

>>87300418
This guy >>87300203 is just a bloody troll

>>87300488
Do you have a letterboxd or something? Or can you list some directors you are already familiar with? Would make this a bit easier, probably.

One of the dullest franchises in the history of TV franchises. Seriously, each episode following the boy FBI agent and his pals from Twin Peaks Sheriff Department as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Lynch vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing an episode; he made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for his meditation. The Twin Peaks series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least FWWM was good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the script was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a fire walk with me, the author wrote instead that the character "had the fury of his own momentum".

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Lynch's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that he has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Twin Peaks by the same Chris Carter. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are watching Twin Peaks at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to watch X-Files." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you watch "Twin Peaks" you are, in fact, trained to watch X-Files.

>>87300708

I don't have letterboxd

Lars von Trier, Gaspar Noe, Guy Maddin, Chris Cunningham, Dario Argento, Andrej Tarkovsky, John Waters, Jörg Buttgereit, ... to name some

>>87300841
awful copypasta

>>87294342
fpbp lynched

>>87300841
>no image
All your effort is for naught.

File: Because we HATED it.png (284KB, 1080x1471px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1080x1471px

So who wants to tell them

File: YExKnLt.jpg (490KB, 1100x500px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 1100x500px

LYNCHED

>>87294342
Rekt. How will anon ever recover?

>>87300919
I don't know. Try to get more familiar with the medium of film. Maybe the points I made will make more sense to you. On the other hand, you will be able to defend your own point better. Considering what you just posted I have to assume you massively misjudge the works of David Lynch in the broader context of film and surrealism in film.

>>87301367
>you massively misjudge the works of David Lynch in the broader context of film and surrealism in film

why don't you enlighten me on what you mean by that?

I don't insist on Lynch being a landmark surrealist filmmaker. He has a lot of flaws and, like many others, "steals from the greatest" without giving proper credit (which I hate).

I'm not particularly well informed on surrealist film traditions, but I know some of the works by Bunuél and I have yet to look into Ingmar Bergmans work.

And I'm certainly not a film expert either. Not trying to be either. I'm focusing more on the art, narrative and visual aspect in a film rather than the writing and "correct" dramaturgical basis.

>>87301700
You seem to have gotten that very right. By being familiar with some directors that are comparable in a sense and the medium in general you get less impressionable and it's less likely to mistake things for what they're not, especially when they're trying to be. Like bad acting. Or bad narrative. Or bad ideas. That's a tough one. Aesthetics in general. Do you have a photo showing how you dress? Haircut? You can photoshop your face out.

>>87301860
>Do you have a photo showing how you dress? Haircut? You can photoshop your face out.
lol you bloody troll, no i won't upload a photo! what kind of a shallow idiot are you? do you want to judge someone by their looks? I'm not the NY Hipster fag if you expect that!

I agree in general with your point that the more films you've seen, the less you are impressed by empty symbolism, shock moments, poorly written twists in the plot and deus ex machina.
I'm an avid cinema fan, but I don't get as deep as watching each and every film by Polanski or something like that. I don't want to excell as a film expert, I watch them for inspiration, to sink into a particular world and maybe get something out of it. Not because I want to write some twenty reviews for a student magazine or anything like that.

I watch all kinds of films, except for Blockbuster shit and I would say without hesitation that I can tell bad acting apart from intentionally awkward acting, as it is employed by Lynch in some cases.

What is your approach to film anyhow?
What is a "bad idea" to you and why?

I enjoyed the trashy effects (Diane Tulpa disintegrating etc.) for what they are, because I have made digital video with effects myself in the past and I am well familiar with video editing.

>>87301860
what would you call a particularly bad idea in this season ( except the wigs) ?

>>87302148
hey easy on the wigs!

>>87302119
No need to get offensive. That's okay.

There are also a lot of films beyond Polanski if you meant to say his are especially obscure for you. Please watch more films before discussing this kind of stuff, seriously. Your views will change a lot. You will also be surprised what else the medium has to offer and will surely fall in love with quite a few filmmakers you'll discover. What you consider a good film both in the sense of what you enjoy as well as what you would like to have made changes a lot the more you get familiar with different stuff.

>>87302498
now you're just sounding snotty and precocious.
Just drop some names of films that you'd find mandatory to make "a better judgement" like the expert that you are so I can see if I already know them.

And what acting by whome in particular is so bad in Twin Peaks?

>>87302498
indepth on any subject expands your horizon a hundredfold, I give you that. But you need to be a little more specific. What films in particular enlightened? You didn't answer me on what your approach to film is, professionally or hobby.

>>87296298
Breaking Bad is good you faggot, even Lynch loves it.

>>87302825
keep telling yourself that

>even lynch
k e k

>Surely no one will notice me replying to myself

>>87294342
delet

>>87302601
>>87302708
>>87303027

>>87303177
I'm not gonna get letterboxd just to argue with you, mate.

>>87303237
What are we still arguing about?

>>87303325
I forgot and I don't care
this is going way too slow
I'm out

>>87303353
Wish you all the best.

File: pathetic.jpg (151KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 500x280px

>>87300841
Please check img.

>>87302863
>Lynch: I liked “Mad Men” and “Breaking Bad” a lot, and I … Let’s see. Those were two of my favorites.
http://www.indiewire.com/2017/05/twin-peaks-david-lynch-interview-showtime-1201818889/2/

>>87294219
For me the biggest problem is how slow it is. Sure, I can watch a slow-paced 3-hour arthouse film but 18 hours of nothing happening is just torture.

>>87294219
people said the same about FWWM at the time and it's easily one of the best films ever made

>>87303618
can you get any more delusional? do you realize what you're saying?

>>87303618
Jesus Christ, Quentin was right.

looking back over the whole season is disturbing as shit
>audrey raped and crazy
>diane raped
>sarah palmer possessed
>log lady dead
>coop and laura trapped in nightmare reality
hell even Coop's brief reunion with his friends in Twin Peaks was overlayed with a shot of his face looking worried and frightened
nostalgiafags btfo forever

File: 555-come-on-now.jpg (15KB, 236x213px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 236x213px

>>87303618
>easily one of the best films ever made

>>87294342
David Lynch: The Ar Life synopsis.

>You now realize the best part of the reboot occurred in the first 30 mins when Madeline zima got fucked

https://youtu.be/pk7Aatafk3Q?t=1m12s

I'm almost done with season 2. is Fire Walk With Me actual required viewing before season 3?

>>87304160
Somehow I always knew Madeline Zima's ass would be the highlight.

File: InTheCourtOfTheDumbFrogposter.png (1MB, 710x704px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 710x704px

>>87304160
>tfw episodes 1-4 were actually the high point of the reboot

File: 1504192423160.webm (1MB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1080px

>>87296428

>>87301860
>Do you have a photo showing how you dress? Haircut? You can photoshop your face out.
Congratulations for making one of the stupidest posts on one of the stupidest boards.

>>87304248
This, but unironically

>>87304195
Don't even bother with season 3. Just pretend the end of season 2 is the series finale.

EVERYBODY LOOK HERE:

How can i achieve that godly haircut? What sort of hair do i need to have to sport it good?

I have lots of fucking hair in my head and need a new haircut.

>>87304043
>>audrey raped and crazy
When did they say she was raped?

>>87304726
why do you think Richard existed?

>>87304782
She could have married/fucked anyone.
Is there any good reason to think she was raped?
Not to mention I've read Frost claims Audrey is in a critical condition - so how did she even have a kid to begin with?

>>87304904
Mr. C says Richard is his son.

>>87304904
>She could have married/fucked anyone.
Mr. C literally acknowledged explicitly that Richard was his son.
>Is there any good reason to think she was raped?
Because Mr. C is a rapist maybe?
>Not to mention I've read Frost claims Audrey is in a critical condition
When did he say that? It seems pretty unlikely that he would give away something like that.

File: URAM004.png (1MB, 1048x681px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1048x681px

>re-enacting your JAV's on primetime television

MADMAN
A
D
M
A
N

>>87305036
I forgot that, fair enough.
>>87305061
>When did he say that? It seems pretty unlikely that he would give away something like that.
He said it in the book, with regards to the bomb in the bank.

>>87305146
that explosion happened 25 years ago
why would she still be in critical condition

>>87305269
It sounded like it was implied to be a coma.
A lot of theories about Audrey this season seem to revolve around her being in a coma.

>>87294219
Weekly reminder that Lynch is mentally ill.
https://vimeo.com/4201441

My take: Cooper Go to hell - or a place where Black Lodge keeps people and their evil spirits are free - and tries to save Laura, but he got tricked.

Evidence: dinner scene, waitress is being harassed by evil spirits that got surprise when someone could overtake them, since it would be impossible.
Also, the guy the killed herself and Carrie just not caring about that.

>>87305404
well if that's true then it definitely was raped
apparently there have been some rare cases of pregnant women giving birth in comas

>>87295231
Oh boy, it's like when retards thought the Lost ending was "they were dead the whole time" all over again.

File: 0cd25a3dafa6955873dd10323c563e98e2c60e5f8874bfc29c34045af1aac64c.png (183KB, 449x387px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 449x387px

>>87295013
>think Lynch is a Renaissance man of twists and turns
>listen to Alex Jones interview
>oh goddamnit
>he's a fucking pleb

>>87305771
>watches Alex Jones
found the real pleb

>>87305484
My take: You believed in Vadder.

>>87305990
No, Cooper went to hell because he wanted; not as a zumbi

>>87303618
You're correct though

File: 0f2c74313f9381c419749119c0d3fc06c111ef030336e7c8ef755852cab3929d.jpg (105KB, 797x957px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 797x957px

>>87305891
>Lynch/AJ interview on YT
>see link on /tv/
>okay let's hear this shitshow
>dare mention you didn't like it
>"hurr pleb hah!"
no u

>>87303964
That's the thing that made Quentin a legend. He may have been a queer pompous namefag with no PS skillz, but he was usually correct.