Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 0657a00c56248c82e2.jpg (69KB, 500x750px) Image search:
[Google]
69KB, 500x750px
How does /tv/ feel about partaking the consumption of the superior art form?
books:
>written in solitude by anguished lonely nerds
>only needs a piece of paper and le imagination, any child with downs syndrome and a pencil can do it
>not a shared experience
>cold and long, goes on for hours of reading, for people who want to escape or pass the time
>too focused on information, for pseudo intellectuals who think thousands of words will make them smart
Kìnemae:
>made by dozens to thousands of people, the director sitting in his throne with total control over the whole team, the last acceptable dictatorship
>director needs to be a natural leader with a strong will
>requires budget and technical apparatus and knowledge, filtering the incompetent
>phisically brings people together
>requires only the main sense of humans, vision, anyone from a megalopolis to a tiny village in asia can share the experience
>undermines excessive information in favor of emotion, reaching into people's very spirits
How will books ever recover
>>
>the director sitting in his throne with total control over the whole team, the last acceptable dictatorship
That's only true if the film is completely self-financed. Otherwise, it's the studio executives making the calls, and even they have obligations to the shareholders.
>>
>>87254191
I know this is bait, but this
>for pseudo intellectuals who think thousands of words will make them smart
is so fucking true. I hate people who think that reading books magically increases their IQ.
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1