/tv/ has absolutely dreadful taste. Far worse than the other

>/lit/
>art form
KEK go get me a coffee barista

it's all the same all the time
GoT, capeshit, sw or aliens/terminator debates going on. of course cia/bane lurkking from time to time and pretty much thats all /tv/

>>87158157
you just don't get us.

You forgot /v/ ;^)

>>87158275
It was different when Chuck was in charge.

>endless Pet Sounds, Loveless, Sunbather, and Coltrane shitposts equal good taste

>worse than /mu/
>

>>87158157
I actually think the essential /tv/core movies are pretty good with the exception of TDKR.

File: flat,800x800,075,f.jpg (18KB, 248x189px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 248x189px

>>87158287
>you just don't get us, do you?

>>87158157
>/mu/
You self-deluded faggots don't even know who Prince is.

File: cuck.jpg (1MB, 1820x4348px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1820x4348px

>harry potter series is most talked about
>implying you can have worse taste than this

File: _1090-.png (13KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 256x256px

>/lit/

>>87158658
>American Psycho
>Fight Club

Nice to see they condescended Shakespeare a spot

File: IMG_1548.gif (41KB, 293x200px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 293x200px

>>87158614
???

>>87158157
>implying /mu/ isn't the worst

They literally judge a band/artists worth on how obscure they are. Top Pleb

>>87158157
/lit/ is full of retarded frog threads and /mu/ listens to non-orchestral pop music garbage. Both are hardly better than /tv/.

>>87158157
Agreed.
>BvS is the most expensive arthouse film!
>GoT thread spam
>HAHAHAHAHA posting
>Endless /pol/ shit
>Capeshit forever
>Star Wars forever
>RLM threads forever

>>87158658
where is all the marx books?

>>87158157
Honestly, the best discussions about art forms on this site happen on boards that aren't dedicated to the interest. For example, a lot of good music discussion happens on boards that aren't /mu/, a lot of good television and movie discussion happens on boards that aren't /tv/, etc. People who are REALLY into their hobby take shit too seriously.

>>87158472
Those are infinitely better than capeshit. By comparison, /tv/ spends all day talking about the top 40 country and rap songs.

>>87158937
>no Star Trek/Riker a fat threads
Hello newfriend

>>87158157
No, /mu/ is definitely worse

>>87158937
you forgot the JUST threads

>>87158157
It doesn't get worse than /mu/.

File: 1.jpg (121KB, 1600x990px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1600x990px

>>87158275
That's cool and all baby, but thats nothing..

>>87159051
in the last few years I'd agree to an extent. Poptimism sure ruined that place but let's not pretend /tv/ isn't shit with all the capeshit discussion

>>87158157
I think its because movies and tv take much more money to produce than a book or an album so theres a limited supply of good stuff which is why we mostly shit on everything

File: Band.of.Outsiders.1964.Criterion.720p_00:15:12.620.jpg (112KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 960x720px

>>87158157
Not me, I have taste. Now post your top 10 directors, frogpostering retard.

>>87159034
>Implying there's a problem with Star Trek/fat Riker threads
Maybe you need to leave before I get violent

File: IMG_1491.jpg (93KB, 705x530px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 705x530px

>>87159191
Why don't you make me fat boy?

>>87158419
Things were better when this was a Televuck & Fuck board.

>>87159149
>i have taste
>posts Goddard

anon I...

File: 1502827007914.png (43KB, 706x669px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 706x669px

>>87158157
>/mu/ has good taste

HAHAHAHAGAGAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

File: Riker[1].jpg (39KB, 550x366px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 550x366px

>>87159277
It's go time Mr. Potatohead

>>87158157
Just like this place you sometimes find a good threads on /mu/ but mostly its K-pop, Grimes and pop/rap album of the month discussions.

it really did went to shit

>>87159019
>By comparison, /tv/ spends all day talking about the top 40 country and rap songs.

Yeah, at least other boards discuss classics, /tv/ can't even do that

File: Pierrot.Le.Fou.1965.720p.BluRay.x264-CiNEFiLE_00:18:24.686.jpg (99KB, 1280x544px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1280x544px

>>87159320
Problem, pleb? I would strike you down on the spot were we face to face!

>>87158472
>meme metal in between all of these oft-discussed but still quite good things
kind of depressing t b h

>>87159420
we larping now?

you can't mentioned Goddard and god taste in the same sentence but I suppose it's easier to go along with your delusion.

Don't worry anon you'll acquire taste one day at least, the same can't be said for most of these people.

>>87159119
>not preferring eggshell with romalian type

That's because /tv/ is actually /celebrity/ or /co/ or basically fucking anything tangential to tv and film but not actually tv and film

>>87159019
Those are literally the capeshit of the music genre

>>87159402
But I have been in many a "classic film" threads over the years on /tv/. There even used to be Tarkovsky threads that hit bump limit. When Edward Yang's A Brighter Summer Day was released by Criterion, there were a couple threads about it, and I'd consider Yang less than mainstream.

/mu/ is a piece of shit
they only talk about shit on the radio or something like hipster pusy rock, yuck

File: 33405-004-0D475D88.jpg (22KB, 360x450px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 360x450px

The paradoxical fact of 4chan is that activity has always inversely related with quality. The more users a board has the less able it is to intelligently discuss its subject matter. An unending deluge of worthless shitposts creates a constant downward pressure on everything that doesn't receive sustain attention and thus the board fractures and users end up congregating into a few reoccurring threads that they relate to which inevitably devolve into repetitive circlejerks and stale rehashed discussions. The rest of the board is occupied by blogs, baits, recycled content, and flavor of the month memes that fade into obscurity as soon as the next bit of novel flair comes along.

File: 1489629582255.jpg (88KB, 855x885px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 855x885px

>>87158472
>>87158525
>>87158614
>>87158857
>>87159051
>>87159327
what they said
/mu/ is a hivemind of contrarian one uppers

File: Pierrot.Le.Fou.1965.720p.BluRay.x264-CiNEFiLE_00:57:54.011.jpg (111KB, 1280x544px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1280x544px

>>87159471
You've still yet to explain the problem with Godard, who is easily one of the most influential and significant French filmakers, an auteur who's career spans decades, who's still making film to this day. Elaborate on your claim, or shut up and stop shitposting - everything you've said is baseless.

>>87159019
No, they absolutely are not. Coltrane is the only somewhat decent one in that list.

File: The greatest achievements.jpg (910KB, 2600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

910KB, 2600x1000px

>>87159641
The problem with /mu/ is that music is amongst the lowest form of art, right alongside the likes of video games. Anyone who engages music as an art form over, say, film or literature, must therefore be a spewing pleb. Music is strictly complimentary, at best.

>don't watch tv or listen to music anymore and still browse those boards daily
music video for this feel?

>>87159747
low effort bait

File: 1479136209160.jpg (31KB, 316x340px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 316x340px

>>87159648
geez anon I see you really are taken with him.

anyway when you decide to actually check out and get familiar with actual french filmmakers and not a pseudo manlet hipster who made his films for the critics and filmed the same "cool" film twenty times I'd suggest watching Malle, Bresson, Renoir, Resnais and hell maybe even some Becker for something a little more light handed.

But I can see you're only starting your journey into film so I can't really blame you for being so mesmerized by him. I do like alphaville and week end.

>>87159747
Mr Popper's Penguins > The entire history of classical music

>>87159747
That picture makes me want to die even though I know it's bait.

File: 1466276814314.jpg (129KB, 668x712px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 668x712px

>>87158157
>(/lit/, /mu/,


Pynchon and Kanye, truly the epitome of taste/

File: 1387091428836.gif (825KB, 350x246px) Image search: [Google]

825KB, 350x246px

>>87159747
>in video games
>art

>>87159819
My post isn't bait, albeit the image may be (I agree with it though, just not strictly).

>>87158658
this confirms that /lit/ doesn't even read

what the fuck

>>87159861
>and filmed the same "cool" film twenty times
Literally disregarded your entire post upon reading this. This is the low-effort spew you read in Malick threads. Thanks for wasting my time with this banal discourse.

>>87158339
>art

>>87159922
>100 books
>don't read
That's more than the average millennial will read in their lifetime.

>>87158157
Are you kidding me? /mu/ has the most split up opinions of any of these boards. I've seen the most shit opinions posted on there also.

>>87160045
I guarantee you less than 5 people on /lit/ have made a serious attempt to read Ulysses, much less finished it.

>>87160007
Thanks for proving my point. Your affection is clearly making you blind to the obvious.

also a Malick thread on /tv/? Not likely.

You're already wasting your time with Goddard so it's nothing new for you I imagine but best of luck on your journey to discovering cinema though.

File: Peru Gem.png (147KB, 1028x408px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1028x408px

>>87160030
>people take the word "art" too seriously like it means anything
Anything can be art to anyone

>>87160045
I actually read somewhere millennials are reading more than previous generations. Also believe it or not anon more people are reading books today than they were in 1955.

>>87160068
It's required reading in college. Everyone getting a English or Philosophy degree has read it

>>87158658
>the great gatsby and catcher in the rye next to each other
>the two books that were mandatory to read in high school
Really makes me think about how old the userbase is

File: 1485583464459.png (124KB, 528x128px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 528x128px

>>87160104

>>87158157
/v/ has pretty terrible taste

>>87160146
>this isn't fact, it's bastardization of it

>>87160147
>videogames
>bad taste
I mean it's a given is it not?

>>87160123
Doubtful, DQ being that high is another tell that the kids over there don't actually read the books they're claiming they have.

>all that top 30 pynchon

kek its a meme kid, don't take it so seriously.

>>87160120
Fuck, I'm gonna stop reading now.

File: 1495003118632.jpg (75KB, 600x583px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 600x583px

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU FUCKING FAGGOTS /MU/ IS GOOD

>>87159681
Pet Sounds is good. The other two aren't really

>>87160319
If you really think that, you probably haven't spent much time there yet

>>87158181
Lmao

>>87159747
Fuck off, cinema can never match the grandeur of music. This is because music stimulates the creative parts of the mind, aiding the listener in creating worlds vaster than any camera could ever encapsulate. Cinema will always be a limited medium, since the worlds it presents are by necessity streamlined, as opposed to the free-flowing worlds of music, and as such, no movie will ever be as evocative and apocalyptic as ITCOTCK.

This is also why cinema is a lesser art form than music.

File: 1450508873163.jpg (1MB, 3636x1640px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3636x1640px

Thats what happens when you let /sp/ and /v/ parasites feel welcome

>>87158658
>54
>Harry Potter series

"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

The REAL thing about /tv/ that discredits the whole board's taste is the fact that we have a big brother general.

Lmao how you faggots pretend like your not all from the same board, fuckin autism fudgin chips man

>>87159747
>Putting Minecraft and The Last of Us in the same league as Dwarf Fortress
What the fuck is wrong with you?

File: IMG_1462.jpg (44KB, 797x609px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 797x609px

>>87160428
>threads about a shitty show on /tv/ that's currently on tv
>this board sucks

File: Song.To.Song.2017.jpg (136KB, 1280x536px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1280x536px

>>87160417
>as opposed to the free-flowing worlds of music
Imagine being so wrong, pic related.
Anything music offers cinema can offer better, because cinema integrates music in its very core and is everything music is plus more. And even without music, film can invoke the melody of music in the subconscious mind, while music without sound is nothing at all. Film is whole, with or without music as a complementary, while music itself is an insignificant smear stuck to the bottom of the boot of art and its mediums.

>>87160602
Deny it all you want, but you know in your bones that I'm correct. This is why your mom would chase you outside when you watched too much TV, but she would never throw you out for listening to too much Bach. Humans have an instinctive understanding of the healthiness of music. This is also why all cultures in history have music, while only decadent and decaying cultures have cinema.

File: 1503703130667[1].jpg (158KB, 1028x1185px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1028x1185px

>>87160602
>A medium that is dominated by capeshit and worn-out franchises as an excuse to make a quick buck with minimal effort is better than an established art form that requires actual work and effort.

Really gets my noggin' joggin'.

>>87159747
What it that anime above Ghost in the Shell? Don't seem to recognize it.

>>87158157

For you

>>87160068
Kit is actually pretty good and knows there shit. Honestly far better than tv. Sad to say.

>>87158157
>/tv/
>taste


this is just the best place on the site to casually shoot the shit, the pretense of devotion to tv and film is just an icebreaker

File: 4L_xjMsAgK2.jpg (16KB, 220x302px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 220x302px

>>87158472
>>87158525
>>87158614
>>87158857
>>87159036
>>87159051
>>87159381
>>87159327
>>87159569
>>87159747
>>87159890
>>87160053
Scaruffi alone has better taste than this shitty board
http://www.scaruffi.com/cinema/best100.html
rateyourmusic users also have decent taste as well
https://rateyourmusic.com/films/chart
both aren't great but there's at least appreciation of non-entry level shit
/mu/ is bad with the poptimism already, but I very rarely see discussion of actual good films on /tv/. I hate to say it, but /tv/ really needs some avant-teens to balance out the cape shit and shitty netflix shows.

>>87162297
Are you retarded? Scaruffi drones practically dominate /mu/, wake up

>>87158275

What is the capeshit of /co/?

>everyone pretends to be a patrician
>board is full with capeshit, got, walking dead and other garbage

>>87162430
Capeshit.

>>87162402
it may not be great, but if /mu/ were anything like /tv/, the AOTY discussion would be whether we thought the new Drake or Coldplay albums were better. /tv/ is so bad it could use some Scaruffi drones itself

>>87162462
>implying anyone pretends this is good taste