Why did this get such bad reviews? It's not a masterpiece by any stretch, but it's not a turd either. Way better than T3 which has more than double it's rating on RT. The acting is average but not terrible. The action sequences are enjoyable, and the CGI is actually very well done.
>>87081337
I actually agree completely. The movie def sucks in many ways but it's the next best thing after T1 and T2. Everything else is poo.
>>87081337
T2>T1>Gen>Sal>rest
Genesis wasfunwhich is really all I want out of these movies.
I saw it in theatres and it was everything I expected.
Action, Cool Robots
I didn't need exposition or a conclusion to the story.
>>87081337
Bale trashed the critics' lights.
>>87081337
They played it too safe, and made it yet another "find and protect MacGuffin character" plot. They should have made it a proper post-apocalyptic war movie.
Not to mention recycling lines and themes from previous movies. This just reeked of cash-grab from a dying franchise with no new ideas.
>safe pg shit
>dumb people harvester story
>john connor was an uncharismatic doormat
>skynet was tim burton's wife
of the top of my head
>>87081337
>random jabroni is the main character
>christian bale on autopilot
>skynet is spoopy evil lady
>terminators can get taken out with machine guns all of a sudden
Anton Yelchin is the only reason to watch this thing. His Michael Biehn impression was spot-on.
>"Let's just walk into Skynet, guys."
Fuck this movie.
this movie licked balls
>>87082016
>implying
Literally the best part
>>87081510
Genesis was fun. The throw back to the old movies really made it.
I'm not sure what's left for the franchise. It kinda seems like it's been milked dry at this point.
T2 > T1 > Genisys > T3 > eating clue > Salvation