What did you think of the timeline narrative gimmick in Dunkirk?

>>87064682
>lives4were

Does this newspaper have an editor or spellchecker?

>>87064682
>Nolan wants to make a movie about the brit soldiers on the beach of Dunkirk and strips down the entire narrative so much that there is practically no dialogue, no boardroom talking and planning with the generals, no close ups of the enemy (just like the soldiers on that beach didn't see them up close) or characters to hang on to just so the situation itself becomes the focus and we as the audience get a glimpse of how it feels to be bombed/torpedoed/drowned/burned alive while you try to survive through visual storytelling exclusively
>BUT WHERE IS MY LE EVIL SCREAMING NAZI GENERAL SCENE, WHERE IS THE BILLION JEWS BEING GASSED SCENE, WHERE IS THE SCENE OF THE CRAZY GOOD GAY NIGHTLIFE IN BERLIN, SO IGNORANT

Also even Churchill himself called them "The enemy" in basically all of his speeches which can be easily found on youtube.
Also how can a movie based on a 1940 event be bashed for not depicting things that happened in 43, 44, 45?

What an ignorant faggot.

>>87064682
>Richard ((((Cohen))))

Hmmmm

>>87064682

Why do Jews even watch WW2 movies? Is it just to count how many bodies the heroes stack up in determining whether the price of the movie ticket was worth their change?

File: 1446841639168.png (141KB, 439x290px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 439x290px

>>87064682
will the kikes ever stop whining

File: 1472292957751.jpg (42KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1440x1080px

>In her Wall Street Journal essay on Dunkirk, Dorothy Rabinowitz...

File: IMG_1724.jpg (274KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 2048x1536px

>>87064682
Fucking gasp

>>87064682
Don't even bother, this is a jew-controlled board now.
They're everywhere.
The conspiracy has never been stronger sadly.

>>87066577
>now

you do know that the original owner m00t was a fucking jew right?