I don't get the hype, she's not attractive at all,

also m00t

>>86920365
What's the matter manlet, too tall for you?

she's generic and reminds people of their mommies

>>86920365
>not attractive
she is but physical attractiveness is not the point of a character in a story you fucking dumbass.

>not a good actress
how so? What does she do that upsets you? Ripley is a great role and there could have been maybe six or seven women who could have pulled that character off. Weaver did an excellent job but she had good writing and directing behind her. But the story itself is just a slasher in space. You might be expecting too much. To my knowledge she never really picked another ambitious role. Ghostbusters? Anyone could have done that role and no one would have noticed. She was only in Avatar due to nostalgia. She's a fine actress but she avoids challenging roles and probably prefers her level of celebrity.

File: bonus.png (15KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 420x420px

>>86920365
You can't understand the movie until you understand the bonus situation.

>>86921349
this

File: IMG_0073.png (21KB, 261x209px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 261x209px

>>86920365
I thought she was the same person as Susan surrandan until yesterday.

>>86921349
very underrated /important post

>>86920365
She appeared in panties in a sci fi movie. Good enough for neckbeards.

>>86920365

Do you make this thread every couple of hours just to get the same responses/images? How sad is your fucking life?

You're right on both counts but she lucked out and landed roles in some of the most entertaining pop movies of the 80s so there you go

>>86922238
yeah she showed that her legs connect to her hips with no ass in between

>pretending to agree just to fit in with a bunch of fucking losers
Stay classy you cunts

File: 1464843222022.jpg (232KB, 1800x2230px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 1800x2230px

If you guys could stop bullying my wife that would be very nice thanks

>>86921516

underage b&

Every damn day, a stupid post like this.

>>86921349
true true

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/tv/image/1502/70/1502705223970.jpg

>>86920365
Often, a woman being unattractive often makes her more attractive, paradoxically, because unattractive men believe they have a chance with her. This is called the Juggernaut Effect I think

>>86920365
>>86921349
Fuck, I could never get passed the expandable crew DLC on Alien Isolation. The vents part scared me more than the hive.

File: 13239001_10205143896355400_959171111899738922_n.jpg (17KB, 470x405px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 470x405px

Honestly I agree completely. I really never found her attractive. Like at all. Possibly because she evokes a more maternal feeling than sexual one, like the other anon said

>>86923880
>implying maternal feelings are bad

>>86920365
>she's not attractive at all

want to know how I know you're gay OP

>>86923384
Gross, dry, scaley feet. 0/10

She looks like she should be Carrie Fisher's older uglier sister.

File: 1503264664363.png (1MB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x1200px

>>86923469
>board overrun with GOT/capeshit/r*ck and memey
>complains about a small number of faithful waifufriends

>>86923880
nah, its because you are underage.

she has the 80sgirl look, which was attractive back then, and still is for those with taste.

Her woman assets are awful, but she does have a pretty face and hair. Which is more than enough.

>>86923948
I'm not "underage" but i see what you mean. She's from a different generation.

>>86923994
>I'm not "underage"
If you have no memories from the 80s you are underage, forever and always.

>>86924029
>nobody born 1990s can be above 18 years old
wat

I assume this is a shitpost, because I refuse to believe that /tv/ has gone this pleb yet

>>86920365
>Explain yourselves /tv/.
NO. I don't owe you shit.

File: 1475455570270.jpg (815KB, 873x1633px) Image search: [Google]

815KB, 873x1633px

>>86921349