>google 2017 movie >there's a review on rogerebertcom

>>86885164
He was never alive to begin with. Siskel and Ebert was a ventriloquist act.

Ebert was such a massive pleb that neither heaven or hell wanted him

He never got a sticky.

>>86885164
he reviewed them ahead of time, idiot

they are all stored in an archive and his foundation uploads them when the movie comes out

They kept his rotting jaw in a jar where it gets screenings for new movies and it sends electromagnetic pulses and ahh fuck it

File: 630e1dc491d861de83a3baed6478ebf9a51d2e805301a910ac984e7268c100ce.gif (1MB, 300x167px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x167px

>>86885231

Can someone PLEASE post the webm of his jaw?

I can't find it.

He left a lot of reviews written before he died that now are being edited by his wife.

>>86885231
>Ebert was such a massive pleb
>didn't like The Thing
>didn't like Stanley Kubrick
>didn't like Paul Verhoeven
>liked the Star Wars Prequels

The only explanation I have for him being America's #1 critic is because he was on TV.

>>86885299
Neither could he

>>86885433
He was also the beginning of film critics giving good/bad reviews simply based on the film having subject matter that is disagreeable to them. He hated Lynch films because they glorify violence and led booing chants for Wild at Heart. So many SJWs have followed in his footsteps.

>>86886721
He liked Eraserhead, The Straight Story, and Mulholland Drive, the last two he gave a perfect score

File: 1426291678658.png (34KB, 675x694px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 675x694px

>>86885244