> ITT: Films you think get shit on way too hard Now it did

> I liked the dubstep theme for Electro, it suited him

this was, without exaggeration, the worst thing i have seen in the history of movies

>>86813810
Is that poster real?

Yes films get shit on way too much for pretty tiny reasons but the films are still bad.

>>86813904
Did this poster not read the first sentence?

>>86813810
>falsely advertising three villains
There were three villains. Are you daft?
>The grotesque design of the Green Goblin was great and better than actual plastic goblin mask of old Spider-Man
And yet it was ruined by the actor's performance.
>Exploring Peter's parents in more depth
You're thinking of the first one. There was barely any of that in the sequel.
> The web making the shape of a hand was corny but I dug it. Plus the sudden smack that killed Gwen was an "Oh shit!" moment
Gwen Stacey's death is quite infamous. Have you never read a spidey book in your life or are you just really, really young?

>>86813810

> Awesome chemistry between Garfield and Stone
Yeah. They were fucking. It was great chemistry between the two actors but Peter and Gwen sucked. Cartoon was way better.
> The grotesque design of the Green Goblin was great and better than actual plastic goblin mask of old Spider-Man
Really? I thought it was awful.
> Exploring Peter's parents in more depth
It was done in a shit way and completely unnecessary.
> The web making the shape of a hand was corny but I dug it. Plus the sudden smack that killed Gwen was an "Oh shit!" moment
Was it really? Everyone knew she was going to die