>Season 1 is always the best
>exposition is always the greatest thrill you will ever get from a movie or show
>building up to climax always sucks
>the ending is always bitterly disappointing
depends on a lot of things.
comedies for example, are usually best in the middle, OK in the beginning, and often terrible towards the end.
A lot of more recent TV is boring at the beginning but gets interesting later on.
Although, you just described Game of Thrones and the walking dead. is that what you like?
Season 1 being the best season only applies to a handful of shows. Season 2 is generally the best.
>>86711647
wrong
>>86711647
This. Second is usually when the writers, cast, and show runners hit their stride, and they have just enough established with the first season that they can build on it, but not be trapped by it.
>>86710707
>exposition is always the greatest thrill you will ever get from a movie or show
what the fuck? thats always the most boring part, I dont give a shit about some scientist telling us made up shit about how a super fast car works or whatever
Season 1 is when the writers and directors are experimental and pull out all the artistic stops to try to impress the studio and win a viewership.
After that is when the Jew takes over and everything becomes overproduced and bland.
>>86711768
First is when they pull the punches to bait for a second season.
The second is when they actually deliver. They might create new plots and themes and characters to bait for a third season but it doesn't matter because the main themes that make a series good have been introduced in the first and developed fully in the second
>They were better in the books
>>86711647
>>86711768
No, S2 is when the writers, etc write what the fans want and the actors start becoming self conscious because they've seen themselves on screen and so they change how they act
>>86712289
??? only weirdos watch themselves at the time.