The Harry Potter films are getting remade and you're in

>>86605694
Harry didn't look like a Jewish manlet in the books, Ron didn't look like an ugly nigger and is described as having completely different facial features (pointy nose), Hermione gradually became attractive

I guess that's a good place to start then. Do better as a miniseries or short TV series

Anonymous 2017-08-19 11:51:00 Post No.86606916
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-19 11:51:00 Post No.86606916 [Report]

>>86605694
I don't because there aren't any good ones anymore. Let alone enough to fill these films. Stop being a reddit tier geek I mean they likely cast 40 characters at minimum perfectly

Anonymous 2017-08-20 12:00:22 Post No.86607257
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-20 12:00:22 Post No.86607257 [Report]

>its been 41 minutes and he hasnt posted it yet
im getting worried

Anonymous 2017-08-20 12:06:04 Post No.86607452
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-20 12:06:04 Post No.86607452 [Report]

>>86605694
Talk shit about these movies all you want but the casting was fucking excellent. I just finished watching them all last week and watching everyone grow up as the movies went by was my favorite part.

Anonymous 2017-08-20 12:28:07 Post No.86608117
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-20 12:28:07 Post No.86608117 [Report]

>>86605694
Why would you be interested in recasting someone in a childrens series bassd off of one the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Ann Frank.