It's up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Hr R5X72_LM

>no dunkino review
fucking hacks

Thanks, easier for me to click and dislike this way.

File: 1449760227689.jpg (54KB, 540x472px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 540x472px

>>86466397
Are their clickbait retarded thumbnails ironic or have they fallen down the rabbithole and it's (((ironic))) because they know what the friend simulator viewers want is silly pictures of their internet pals?

>>86466480
What are you talking about?

>>86466480
Stop using the word ironic, you clearly don't know how to.

*Pumped up Kicks - Bridge and Law remix starts playing*

Nerd Crew
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyDSqWyEMWw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vmzC40dxM8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAx3joUhIR8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ-76cEkUPw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH-F4_wMwCg

Best of the Worst
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vHZu-eFhx8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55EjTXdMkfg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bwXUopLfu4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQwLseLtgx4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEAnJATsCIk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ1pfdrhcPM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Qb2lt4ZzYI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRZTDEJUilE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztfb6XCzXE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gy8Abf38QMo

Half in the Bag
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTN6z5e7LFw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9GaG3UPjDo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqLnbRKdw6c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRLCtLe6XY8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kc27aY7UU9U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQrS04Qzv0E

Other
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2e5x64K3F44
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTM07-S8ICE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lvhvsc_TZA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdWRG5UB6fA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzJ-wM45O2c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmUtDm4-iwM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6P62b17uRc

>>86466611
It's not even up to date.

>>86466397
Out of all the newly released films since the last HITB they decide to do one about a studio horror jumspcare fest #5437?

...why?

File: 1500468402152.jpg (110KB, 1143x993px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1143x993px

>>86466603
You're right, I (don't) ((know)) (((how))) to().

>>86466702
>...why?
Because they wanted to talk about Rotten Tomatoes and the shady "contest" related to this movie.

At least it's not capeshit

>that zoom in on Chris Stuckmann's early embargo glowing review
MY SIDES

>>86466702
Dunkino - lots of people liked it so they are afraid of saying their contrarian salty opinions without getting called out

Apes - they can't talk about all the obvious racial and political allegories because it would create a shitstorm

transformers is a meme, they don't even watch them anymore

they never review animated films

what else there is? fucking baywatch?

>stuckmeme is included on rotten tomatoes

File: 1fnolXU.png (21KB, 200x194px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 200x194px

>>86466397

>it's a horror movie review

no thanks

who watches this pleb genre

$50 DOLLARS (bucks)

>>86466885
>Dunkino - lots of people liked it so they are afraid of saying their contrarian salty opinions without getting called out
When have they ever given a shit about having an opinion that's contrarian? Mike loved Jurassic World and hated Boyhood.

>Apes - they can't talk about all the obvious racial and political allegories because it would create a shitstorm
They talked about the other two Apes movies.

File: stylishandcreepy.jpg (171KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1366x768px

What did they mean by this?

no mention of valerian and the city of a thousand planets

Holy shit, that fucking contest

>Mike calling Hollywood
Great review.

>>86467077
I kekd

>>86467077
why is there a nun reviewer

>>86466397
Have they triggered the alt left babies again?

>>86466702
Because they're hack frauds that don't have any real opinions, it's easy to shit on things that are obviously bad and it sells.

>>86467077
Was this the guy who cried when they joked about him at one video?

>>86467244
Why not?

>>86467301
They give positive reviews pretty regularly.

File: Zod's snapped neck.png (111KB, 217x231px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 217x231px

>>86467302
Yes.

File: eHSIr6o.png (60KB, 282x200px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 282x200px

>that warner brother contest
OY FUCKING VEY

File: 1497430742645.jpg (113KB, 1252x1252px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1252x1252px

>HAHAHA! DUDE LIKE ALL MOVIES SUCK AND ARE DULL LIKE LMAO I JUST WANT TO KILL MYSELF! ARENT I JUST LOVABLE ON MY CONTROLLED JADED CYNICISM?
>Conciously avoids anything interesting and willingly indulge themselves exclusively on soules cashgrabs to mantian their apathetic facade

What in the fuck did they mean by this?

>>86466447
They did review it.

>>86467077
>catholic church has there own movie critics

>>86466397
tfw no Dunkirk hitb

>>86467464
>didn't watch lol
>better shitpost

Holy shit 50 US dollars!

File: 1502785363975.jpg (78KB, 606x606px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 606x606px

>>86467464
Mike and Jay the vcr repairmen are fictional characters, they are not real people

File: 1492105844953.jpg (217KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1000x563px

>>86466702
Did you not see their Bye Bye Man review? It was one of the funniest HitB's of all time.

Half in the Bag is at his best tearing apart these dumpster fire '''horror''' '''''films''''''

50 BUCKS X 2

>>86467642
A whole hundred if they turn your idea into a movie!

>>86467573
There are actually a lot of these. Find like a Christian Community website and you'll find all sorts of things, namely because it's exactly that; a Community.

I envy it honestly. It's like that old town vibe where you know everyone, but it's updated to the 21st century. So instead of going to ESPN for the sports, you have a guy in your community who writes a column.

File: farmer-55347614a5a0b_exlst.jpg (29KB, 468x350px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 468x350px

>>86467642
THAT'S LIKE A BAJILLION OF MY RUPEES
THANK YOU BASED WARNER BROS

>>86467691
+ a plane ticket that will go to waste, since they'll tell you to fuck off.

File: 1501794187657.png (67KB, 168x239px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 168x239px

Sure dude can't wait to hear their idiotic breakdown of the industry, specially after their hiliarously wrong video about box office bombs.

Aren't these clowns rapidly nearing their 40s are they ever going to try to get into the industry or will they remain perpetual YT dancing monkeys?

>>86467753
wouldn't be surprised if the prize was only the meeting, and the contract states that the winner is responsible for his own travel arrangements

but they won't be available anyway, so the trip was for nothing, yeh

>>86467786
Hello David

File: 1498168654579.png (196KB, 335x455px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 335x455px

>>86467786
And you are still on /tv/, probably nearing a decade now. Think about that.

File: Annabel.jpg (1MB, 3664x2748px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3664x2748px

>>86467077
Chris Stuckmann grew up with Annabelle after all

File: maxresdefault.jpg (108KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1280x720px

>>86467077
Meltdown incoming or has he wised up after the last incident?

>>86467786
RLM clearly loves movies but hates "the industry." If you think they would want to be a part of that, you may be genuinely retarded.

>>86467841
>defending your internet friends
Think about that.

>>86467361
No, they have never given a valid review; they give positive opinions and pass such surface levels comments and observations off as valid critique.
>I liked it, it was fun *insert or mention scene that was "fun"*
>I hated it, it was too dark *insert or mention scene that was "too dark" and "unfun"*

>>86467786
>are they ever going to try to get into the industry
they have badmouthed every big hollywood studio

max landis was a window but they fucked up

neil blomkamp wanted to be on their show and nothing came out of it

they are retards, they'll never "make it"

File: 0031c9xt1.jpg (39KB, 377x325px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 377x325px

>>86466397
Watch it

>>86467865
There's no way he will be able to resist. His skin is too thin.

File: 1466080109534.jpg (33KB, 235x259px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 235x259px

Holy fuck, that contest

>>86467895
No, you think about that first.

>>86467898
So basically what you're saying is that you've barely watched any of their videos and have no idea what you're talking about.

>>86467840
>someone criticized my favorite youtube critics!
so you admit that it's all true since you can't debunk anything but say David?

File: 1482263486964.gif (2MB, 260x242px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 260x242px

>>86467911
Check'd

>>86467962
I've watched most of their videos, unfortunately for me.

>>86467906
Can't rape the willing.

>>86467909
>max landis was a window but they fucked up
How? Jay seems to be cold about the whole deal but Mike can't get enough of sucking Max's cock

>>86467909
Isn't the Blomkamp thing happening? I think I remember one anon posting something from Patreon about it.

File: tb2865QK_400x400.jpg (15KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x400px

wtf i hate david f sandberg now

>>86467301
Mike consistently has edgy opinions

>>86467909
>>86468078
Blomkamp is out of the big leagues now.After 2 bombs in a row hes now doing YT shorts or something like that, still way above of RLM so it could be a good thing for them anyway.

>>86468078
They said they'd have Bomkamp in the studio if he contacted them.

>>86467909
>max landis was a window but they fucked up

but they're still good friends according to max's own twitter posts

File: 1496519892303.png (51KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 657x527px

>>86467077
>tfw no nun gf to give you handy cummies during the kino

>reddit letter memeia

>>86468165
Jim Norton played some of the Plinkett review of The Phantom Menace on Opie and Anthony one time. I bet he'd make a great BotW guest.

>>86466453

Worked.

Cuckmann eternally BTFO

>>86468215
Based!

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-16 at 3.14.42 PM.png (152KB, 900x495px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 900x495px

Mike will never stop bullying Rich, won't he?

>>86467929
I dunno lad, thin skined or not, I don't think Chrisy is dumb enough to project his insecurities for the whole internet to laugh at a second time.

It's be fun if he is though.

>>86468344
Yeah, starting to get a bit uncomfortable now.

>>86467457
>>86467642
>>86467683
>>86467937
It's like a crime syndicate ethics, they're basically stealing people's shit and paying them peanuts, but instead of doing it with threats and violence, they're using legalese and small prints. It's really sickening.

>>86467786
They've stared they have no interest in getting into "the industry". They like what they do, to the extent that Mike apparently doesn't really have hobbies or do much else (according to Jay) because he does his hobby for a living.

>>86468351
>a second time
He's already done it more than once. Did you miss his reaction to everyone making fun of his BvS re-write?

Holy shit how will Samberg ever recover?

>>86468473
>make shitty movies
>look for distribuitors
>go to contests and festivals
>never find their way into the industry
>"haha it was all ironically, who needs fame and fortune lol my patreon is enough"

>>86468649
He's directing a huge budget capeshit next. I think he'll be fine.

>>86468792
Yeah but he's clearly a RLM fan, and now they've really rubbed his name in the mud.

File: 5614587848148.jpg (23KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x281px

>>86468611
I meant specifically a second RLM cry-by.

>>86468914
Really all they did was imply he didn't read the rules before he endorsed the contest, which is giving him the benefit of the doubt that he might not have agreed to it if he had.

>>86468914
Not really. They call out Warner Brothers for their sleazy contest but don't lay any of the blame on him. They didn't like his movie but it's not like they call him incompetent or anything.

>>86468979
Whatever you say, David.

File: g1.png (476KB, 810x430px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 810x430px

>>86466397
Hey, Guys! I cannot click to a Emoji Movie review. How can I do this? The review gonna be later or how is this work?

File: 1477771621750.jpg (56KB, 697x620px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 697x620px

>>86468914
>tfw you will never be famous enough to be singled out and humiliated by RLM

>>86466447
eh it was alright

>>86469057
No retard I'm saying they went easy on him when they didn't have to.

File: AAAAAA1385779913511[1].gif (3MB, 359x346px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 359x346px

>Each entrant agrees that ,in addition to the license granted above.Sponsor or any of the sponsor's parents,affiliates or subsidiaries may,upon written notice to entrant at any time within approximately three(3) months of the verification of the winner in this contest acquire from entrant an exclusive and irrevocable option to purchase all right,title and interest in and to hi or her entrant content in exchange for fifty U.S. dollars($50 US).Provided that aid,the option will remain exercisable for a period of not fewer than three years.During the option period sponsor will have the right to develop works or otherwise explore possible exploitation of the rights that will be granted to it pursuit to the option.That sponsor executes its option,the sole and exclusive consideration provided to entrant in exchange for the purchase of all rights in his/her entrant content will be an additional fifty U.S Dollars($50 US).Purpose of clarity and without limiting the foregoing,entrant understands that,should sponsor take and execute the option described here,sponsor will own all rights in the entrant's video and may adapt it into a feature film without any obligation to futher compensate entrant.If neither Mr.Sandberg nor a Aponsor-selected executive from new line cinema is available to participate in the meeting on the Sponsor-appointed date,that portion of the prize will not be awarded and no substitute or replacement will be provided.Nothing in these official rules or any optional agreement executed by the parties will obligate Sponsor to exercise or exploit any of the rights granted to it.

I want that Rich Evans shirt

>>86468979
>be semi-famous director
>not having a lawyer look at a contract you're signing with a multimillion dollar film studio about hosting a film contest

Yeah, I'm sure he's that dumb.

File: 1474976761063.gif (366KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 600x600px

>>86469397
ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS!

>>86467573
>no naked little boys 1/10

>>86469472
>ask your (((lawyer))) if this contract looks okay
>since it doesn't screw you or him, he says it's fine
>doesn't mention that it screws someone else

>>86466397
How do they know how little girls talk?

>>86466397
Annabelle is better than many movies these retards have given positive reviews to.

>>86466885
Please, they shat on the revenant and it was pretty much received like dunquerque

>>86467077
that nun's based double edged review

File: prick.jpg (134KB, 1278x692px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1278x692px

fucking EXPOSED

>>86467077
WHY DO THEY BULLY HIM SO MUCH?

>>86469888
Who, that prick?

>>86469699
Were you never a child?

>>86469640
It does screw you, it makes you look like an ignorant fool at best and a corporate serving douchebag with no morals or integrity at worst.

Any "(((lawyer)))" worth a dime would tell him that.

>>86467475
when

>>86469888
there mad he's more successful then them in a shorter amount of time

>>86469699
They have Rich Evans living in their studio.

>>86469888
>mentioned him once two years ago
>mention him in relation to early critic reviews on RT.
Wow, yeah they just can't stop talking about him.

>>86469888
he grew up with bullying

File: 1501111018563.png (13KB, 165x115px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 165x115px

>>86470035

I have nothing against rottentomatoes burying bad movies but damn filmaffinity is way superior and it's a shame it hasn't caught on to the american public

>>86470398
I'm not visiting your site, but rottentomatoes is just an aggregator. It's as good or bad as the reviews they take into account.
This makes me think if they did the same shit with Ghostbusters last year. It's still at 73% and it's unbelievably bad.

>>86467909
proof these manchildren have ever talked shit about Disney?

>>86468097
>(((Sandberg)))
>(((David)))
>(((F)))

>>86470566
I wasn't advertising the site. My point and the one people who use that site as a guide is that it's so far the most accurate site according to my taste, if there's a movie I haven't seen and it has a 6 in FA it means there's some good to it. and When I say 6 I mean, this site is extremely severe when rating movies, I think only film critics that have proven themselves can rate or some shit like that.

I think the highest rated movie is the godfather with a 9.0. A 9.0 can be achieved in imdb with the shittiest NETFLIX tv show

>>86468039
Then why would you make shit up?

>>86469628
No anon, that's the San Fransisco Gay News review.

File: realnigga.jpg (83KB, 1275x718px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1275x718px

Why are they catering to black people now?

>>86467650
It's the only reason I watch them desu

saying they kinda liked a blockbuster is boring

>>86470809
It's all true. Prove otherwise. The only reviews that weren't like that was when they discussed Lynch on Re:view. Coincidentally, Josh had more to say than Jay.

>>86470809
I need attention, my mom isn't back from work for at least 4 more hours.
>>86470903
It sounds like they gave something you liked a bad review and you took it personal. I think the last positive review was the last one for spider-man.

>>86470903
>Prove otherwise
Easy, Room, think it was in an oscar video.

When have they said "too dark or unfun"? BvS?

>>86467475
no they didnt you stupid fuckin retard

>>86467573
Vatican is patrician.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican%27s_list_of_films

>>86470699
watch the force awakens plinket review you fuckin dum dum

>>86471081
>values
>on the waterfront
why is the vatican anti-union?

>>86471120
You mean after they went and gave it a positive half in the bag?

>>86471149
probably more anti corruption and intimidation, and pro-self sacrifice.

>>86471033
It was just this episode, try to keep up.

>>86471217
yes?
just because they liked the final product doesnt mean they are 100% okay with disney's practices. Literally the opening 20 minutes of that plinkett review is alternating talking shit between george lucas and disney

wtf I hate anything not disney now!

>Too bad sucking Max Landis's cock didn't get us our break in Hollywood
>Let's try ironically poking at this David Sandberg guy who tweeted at us, but lets keep the dick sucking on the down low so we don't lose our core fans.
>Fuck reviewing movies like Dunkirk.
>?
>Space Cop II in theaters nationwide: hopefully before Rich dies of a heart attack

>>86467909
>>86468067
Max Landis is still in contact with RLM, he's busy doing his show or whatever to appear on BoTW but most likely will appear any time soon

>>86466662
Well update it then nerd.

>>86471329
>>86471329
right then they go on another 20 minutes or more about some (fan theory) and don't even talk about the film but the series as a whole it was not a TFA review but a star wars the series review ans as we know they like majority of the star wars films the prequels being the exception

>>86471329
>they liked the final product
and that's why their opinion on said product is irrelevant

>dunkirk
>it's alright
absolutely shit

>>86471369
>Too bad sucking Max Landis's cock didn't get us our break in Hollywood
They've never given any of his movies a good review. Man, that Batman v Superman review really tore your anus a new one.

What did he mean by this? https://twitter.com/ponysmasher/status/897916043150057473

File: 1.png (65KB, 609x631px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 609x631px

:^)

>>86471477
>>86471480
okay? the point is that someone said
"when did they talk shit about disney"
and i said
"right here"

>>86471549
>>86471598
Is he a fucking brony as well? Christ...

>>86471667
Have you seen the horses on that show? Who wouldn't be?

>>86471480
>>86471477
Please, they were at best neutral with that shit and started shitting on them even more after Rougue one and on the "ironic" nerdcrew shit

It's actually a pretty good video, I usually don't bother watching the ones about low budget horror movies

>>86471802
they're the most entertaining ones

>>86471530
They gave him free press, and pay attention to the look of lust on Mike's face when they have Landis on their videos or how Mike's practically jizzes himself when talking about him.

Jay clearly doesn't give a fuck and would be happy doing RLM forever but Mike is probably gonna kill himself (with booze or otherwise) if he never gets his big break.

>>86467302
>>86467397
which video and where is the crying?

Amazing quality as always based RLM
Upvoted

>>86469744
These can'tbe real. These are the most painfully uninspired, lazy and generic "reviews" I've ever read.

>>86471864
>They gave him free press
That counts for all the other movies they review. Jesus, you sure are butthurt. Maybe stop being a cheerleader for garbage Zack Snyder movies.

>>86466397
Here's the hooktube link for anybody who doesn't want to give these morons clicks.
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=_HrR5X72_LM

>>86471802
the one about the bye bye man might be the best half in the bag

>>86471864
Unless Max becomes big enough to pick a director for his own script, Mike is fucked.

>>86471877
one of the reviews where rich calls like 3 reviewers supid assholes.

He was one of them and unsubscribed and started talking shit on twitter

>>86471929
More like for idiots who don't have adblock.

>>86471549
there's a better post on reddit, he replied there
https://www.reddit.com/r/RedLetterMedia/comments/6u3zse/half_in_the_bag_130_annabelle_creation/

scroll down a little

>>86472004
adblock still gives them views

File: jay is a bit of a dick lol.png (81KB, 691x675px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 691x675px

holy shit that's awkward lol

File: He.gif (518KB, 237x157px) Image search: [Google]

518KB, 237x157px

>>86471598
>didn't see the rules of a thing he put his face on
>"once I saw the I didn't read them as bad"
>btw, big winner winner will be announced this week guiz

Can't make this shit up

>>86472054
So does hooktube.

>don't have the balls to review dunkirk
>pick on another shitty cashgrab movie

Hacks

So the guy that was supposed to direct the ultimate Alien nostalgic boner film is now doing personal films in his garage

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjQ2t_yNHQs

Will they ever get Neill Blomkamp on RLM?

>>86472110
Nope. That's the whole point of hooktube

wait, mike knows how to read?

File: 2.png (27KB, 598x270px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 598x270px

kek

Will they ever dislike a disney movie?

>>86472185
You mean Rogue One?

>>86466397
To be fair on the contest, WB own the rights to Conjuring and all relate materials. So a Conjuring inspired short is smart on their part because they are the official rights owners.

Other than that, $50 to make a descion in three months is jewey af. Studios waste quarter million on writers to come in and rewrite a script, only for that script to be rewritten again.

>>86472185
If Disney ever makes a bad movie which will never happen.

>>86472218
They loved TFA SO MUCH that all other star wars seems to fail in comparison

>>86472249
LOL

>>86472136
I imagine this guy is doing his own shit now because studios don't think his visions are adaptable in the "marvel" type of way.

>>86472249
>TFA
>Iron Man 2
>Iron Man 3
>Avengers 2
>Dr. Strange
>Civil War
>Ant-Man
>Spider-man homecoming
>All these live action remake garbage

>>86472259
Hyperbole is fun.

I hate when they get into financial/legal stuff because they have no fucking idea what they're talking about

WB BTFO

>>86472249
Please kill yourself if you actually believe this

>>86472278
I think you're a schizo, but Chappie was terrible. Maybe it had to do with that.

>>86472185
>disney
>being involved with anyone even slightly controversial

sure bud

>>86472136
They got Neill Blomkamp on Funhaus, they can probably get him on RLM

>>86472366
Didn't they own Miramax for the longest time?

>>86467464
>>Conciously avoids anything interesting
Except they've given positive reviews before.

>>86472185
mike is biased

song of the south is his favorite film.

>>86469995
You have no idea how the real world works, do you?

>>86472445
I thought it was Birth of a Nation.

>>86470699
Seriously? Rogue One.

>>86472066
>>86471598
>>86471549
>>86472021
Dude seems to take it all very positively, good sport honestly, if it was Max Landis or the Kong guy they would be posting 30+ tweets bitching about it

I don't hate Max Landis but it would be nice to see this guy on BoTW, he seems like a chill guy and not as loud or annoying as Max

>>86472387
>on funhaus
on a skype call with a shitty connection

>>86472321
Please explain in detail how they're wrong about those contest regulations.

>>86472303
Wow you sure are obssessed with Marvel, DCuck. Those movies are made by Marvel Studios, not Dinsey so they don't count as Dinsey movies even if Dinsey owns them. And even if you think they do, there are tons of shitty Dinsey movies that are way worse than any Marvel flick.

>>86472136
blomkamp wanted to play games with rich and jack and had apparently asked them about showing up

>>86472473
No, they don't watch, let alone like, real kino. For that reason your joke is shit.

>>86472066
again, Jay has praised loads of movies that are objectively worse than Lights Out. If you get your opinions from these guys (and I know a lot of you faggots ITT do), you should do us a favor and kill yourself.

>>86472066
>lol

Jay is such a beta.

>>86471802
They're my favourite actually.

>>86472627
Calm done m80

>>86472555
>so they don't count as Dinsey movies even if Dinsey owns them
lmfao

>only a DCuck can hate Marvel's shitty formulaic flicks

>>86472573
Let me guess: Jack and Rich explained this in a Pre Rec stream that you conveniently can't find a correct link and time stamp for.

>>86472677
Stop replying to your own posts, it's embarrassing.

>>86472185
Why do I see this meme in every RLM thread? Is it cause they trashed BVS?

>>86472555
This falseflagging is so bad it's embarassing.

>>86472718
I'm not m8, I'm replying to a genuine MCUck lel

>>86472811
Yeah, you sound 12.

This is why I like RLM, they troll Stuckmann and then troll the Annabelle dude cause they know he watches it. They're never afraid of rocking the boat and don't give people a free pass cause they're friends.

>>86472885
If that was true they'd have trashed the rest of Len Kapasinski's movies by now

>>86472066
social media was a mistake

>>86472705
Not even
https://twitter.com/neillblomkamp/status/873706208808415232?lang=en

>>86472885
Chris Stuckmann's reaction to being called a prick is probably the most pathetic thing I've ever seen. He made a sad vlog from his bed where he talked about his feelings being hurt

>>86472885
except Landis to an extent (at least Mike)
and they didn't trash the new Samurai Cop, instead they didn't talk about it at all.

but, oh well, they are humans, too.
(are people from Wisconsin humans?

>>86472877
try giving me a (You) from that other post you claim is mine and find out, faggot

>>86472943
uh, that's sort of low hanging fruit compared to sony and new line cinema don't you think

>>86472970
He probably wants to kick their asses.

>>86472943
Mike shat on the movie he was promoting the last time they brought him in for a BOTW.

>>86472995
They quickly mentioned that Samurai Cop sucked and wasn't entertaining in a video, but I don't remember which one.

>>86473039
they could have put it on Best of the Worst like the rest of his movies

>>86472224
"inspired" doesn't mean you own the rights though.
not every doll movie/short automatically belongs to WB.

>>86473021
Not that guy, but you do sound 12. Don't you have homework, lad?

>>86472633
jay is a giggly little chipmunk I bet he actually was laughing out loud

>>86472970
I see no mention of playing games with Jack and Rich in there.

I hope Sandburg doesn't get ass hurt about this.

File: 1379122700982.jpg (7KB, 228x221px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 228x221px

>>86473103
>you will never fill Jay's cheeks with nuts

>>86473164

>>86471598
>>86472066

>>86473200
He's not mad at the review.

>>86472947
4chan is social media.

>>86471598

>it was never about stealing ideas

BUT THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS. It even says so right in the contract.

>>86473229
that's what the anon wanted to show.

>>86466883
so is stuckmann a confirmed shill?i thought shilling was a meme that didn't actually happen until mike and jay opened my eyes

>>86473242
Point still stands

>>86471974
link?

>>86473353
I knew you'd say that.

>>86473100
angry marvlet still at it I see

>>86473399
You enjoy Zack Snyder's "movies." I rest my case.

>>86473334
Ironic considering Mike and Jay are shills

>>86473334
Here's the way I think about it:
Movie studios are expected to invite the critics from The Guardian or whatever, even if they're gonna trash their movie. However, no one has any expectations for them inviting youtube reviewers. So they can invite the ones that will be positive, and encourage them to keep staying positive if they wanna get early reviews. Basically, I would never even bother listening to some rando from the internet who gets invited by a studio because you can't trust them.

>>86471929
based hooktube poster

>>86473430
No, I don't. 300 is his only good movie.But I get a kick out of people that like the MCU getting triggered when people point out their shit stinks too.

>>86473449
Shills for what?

>>86472066
>oh shit I burned another bridge lol

>>86473488
Oh but I don't like capeshit, that was the other idiot you were arguing with.

File: 1468968982384.png (330KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 600x450px

>>86473515
Chunky's Chicken
Shaq Meat
Dan Aykroyd's Wodka

I could go on.

>>86473535
Except he clearly didn't.

>>86473574
Oh yeah.

>>86473515
Dan Aykroyd's vodka

File: 1502867771882.jpg (35KB, 446x396px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 446x396px

>>86472505
I still want that Kong: Skull Island HitB

>>86473089
Sure.
But they state "in the conjuring universe"

>>86473624
I gotta say I enjoy Kong Skull Island but I bet Mike loved it while Jay hated it, or maybe they both hated it

Gotta wait for the end of the year catch up

>>86473673
yeah, but that whole contest is still fishy as fuck

>>86472125
this to be unironically desu

>>86473712
Jay liked it, apparently. I have no idea what Mike's getting at here.
https://twitter.com/redlettermedia/status/897842148699230209

>slowing zooming in on stuckman

Who the fuck is Stickman.

>>86473896
me.

>>86473922
Did you like Baby Driver? I thought it was grate

hmm.. how could this guy go from making youtube videos to making a feature film? i wonder how sandberg pulled it off...

>>86473986
As you know I grew up with baby driver

>>86474235
>le jews le control le world

>>86474266
That's pretty common knowledge, even leftist sites casually mention how most big company CEOs are jewish. Because being jewish isn't considered a bad thing like 4chan has made you think.

>>86471149
Unions are notorious fronts for communists who are typically Anti-religion

>>86474327
oh LEFTIST SITES mention these things????
ok, I shouldn't have said anything.
sorry

>>86474266
>being this far in denial

>>86474383
I'm pointing out how it has nothing to do with /pol/, whose attitude is the one you're mocking with this post >>86474266.

>>86471929
Are you norwegian, perhaps?
If so, you do great work.

>>86474261
Was the acting good? Tell me more about the acting and how you grew up with the acting

>>86474266
They do tend to help out fellow jews. Nepotism.

>>86469706
Its really not though, you just dont know shit about what a good movie is.

>>86474553
I grew up with baby acting

great special effects, and oh my gosh I LOVED the score

I give it an A-

>>86473389
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PS7CgXHxps

So are they actually going to review the other fucking films? I like hearing their shit, but ignoring blatant interesting films/good films is baffling.

>>86474662
I hope they don't just to piss you off.

>>86466963
>liking Jurassic world is contrarian

Do you just not understand what contrarian means?

friend simulator faggots

>>86474235
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ltMh4-ipOE

Just made a horror short, got really popular online and some producers got in contact with him about making it into a feature film.

File: 1502726612526.jpg (39KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x600px

>>86474801
>>86474235
remember when they got mad finding out Josh Trank made Chronicle because of a star wars youtube parody?

>>86471864
>if he never gets his big break
he's 40. stick a fork in him

>>86474954
>things that never happened

>>86474769
You're right. Liking Jurassic World should be considered retarded, not contrarian.

>>86475026
>stick a fork in him
is that a new Beyonce song?

Daisy Ridley was CHARASMATIC AS HELL

Also, reddit jizzes themselves when RLM makes a video and makes sure to agree with them 100% of the time

RLM is a reddit channel

>>86466453
You certainly showed 'em anon, good job. I bet this is the last video they'll ever upload.

>>86475155
RLM - REDDIT LE MEMES

File: file.png (3MB, 960x1440px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 960x1440px

>>86466397
GI Joe did the same thing they implied. They invited a bunch of shit-tier reviewers to an exclusive screening. Shame no one remembers that.

>>86466397
was looking for geniune comments on the rotten tomatoes and contest aspect, as it really is interesting and screwed up
but sadly not surprised to see the same shitposting instead..

>>86475241
remember Channing Tatum?

>there are people who get their opinions from a youtube channel
>especially a youtube channel by mostly fat, middle aged men
>instead of making their own opinions

is there an act more pathetic

>the force awakens was brilliant but dunkirk is just "okay"
contrarians

>>86475280
>screwed up

ok, let's not get ahead of ourselves
Hollywood has always been a shady business

>>86475294
>you caring about what people get their opinion from..
geez people may outsource their opinion on crap they dont care about to entertainers they enjoy..

why not get an opinion on a movie that you may/may not watch while being slighlty entertained?

>>86475294
>there are low IQ subhumans who don't understand the difference between watching something for entertainment and watching something for validation

>>86475337
they value films based on racial and gender representation

>>86475446
There were TWO niggers in dunkirk, TWO french niggers

>>86475355
you right, its more underhanded than screwed up
but thats expected

Chris Stuckmann absolutely BTFO

>>86475337
watching them hate rogue one for the same reasons they loved TFA pretty much invalidated them

>>86475532
im fine with there opinions being different, it may have been more about the intangibles between the movies that may have been the reaosn they like TFA more than RO..

surface level the movies may have the same weaknesses, but TFA may get more of advantage since it was the first SW movie after 10 years and just wanting not mess up like the prequels..

RO may have just been more of the same thing and just another safe movie instead trying for something new

>>86475532
>what is context

>>86474718
and I wouldn't care if they did or didn't.

holy crap the director showed up in the redlettermedia subreddit post about this and talks about the contest

>>86475837
>redlettermedia subreddit
go back there and stay there

>>86467650
And their Shut In review.
Scratch scratch, who's that ratch?

>>86475837
>>86475878
https://www.reddit.com/r/RedLetterMedia/comments/6u3zse/half_in_the_bag_130_annabelle_creation/dlpuw3a/?context=3

"David F. Sandberg here. To be honest I didn't see the rules before the website went online. I was just excited that this was something that Warner wanted to do. Once I saw the rules on the website I read it as the $50 was for the option, not the rights to it (they never spend a lot of money on just an option). If a movie would be made out of your short then I'd assume a negotiation would have to take place to buy the rights for some real money.
As I read the rules I assumed that it was just the lawyers being overly careful. They do that a lot. There's certainly no big plan to steal ideas and kick filmmakers out.
Same with the thing in the rules that they can't guarantee you'll meet with me. I assume that's just the lawyers being careful in case I drop dead or I'm in a coma or something.
The ultimate hope with a contest like this is finding new filmmakers rather than new ideas. It's not something you would want to guarantee but that's what you hope for."

>>86475654
>RO may have just been more of the same thing and just another safe movie instead trying for something new

Yet they praised TFA FOR being safe

They said something along the lines of "recycling a story for new audience is better than telling a new story" Which to anyone with a mind that is not diseased would say that it wrong

But RLM got backlash for it and then made like 5 more videos about it while RLMfags cheered them on because their friend simulator can never be wrong.

I don't even like either movie, but the blatant double standards should have made it clear that they are mostly fanboys, not actual critics

>>86475934
Fanboys of what?

>>86475910
Stuckmann sounds so desperate..this is what the director says to stuckman's positive review:

"What happened with Stuckmann was that he tweeted me (the director) when we had a screening at ComicCon asking if he could come see it since he was in town. I said sure and asked Warner Bros. to reserve him a ticket.
So it wasn't like Warner reached out to him or made some deal. He asked if he could come and I said yes."

>>86475910
they won't negotiate though.
it clearly states they will pay you another 50 Dollars.

>>86475837
>the comments on there and r/movies from RLMFags are the exact same kind of criclejerk we see from RLMfags here

really makes you think

Sanderberg more on the contest:

"They are always looking for up and coming horror filmmaker because the truth is that if you make a couple of successful low budget horror movies you get offered bigger things and not everyone will want to go back to making $5m films when you have the option to play around with bigger budgets. Someone still has to make those $5m films though."

>>86467865
I'm expecting a 15 minute short where he dramatically decides whether or not to take them off of his suggested channels list

>>86475934
>Yet they praised TFA FOR being safe
Yeah, that 42 minute video was nothing but them saying it's safe, yup, nothing else!

And Rogue One was nothing but them saying it's bad because it's safe! Yup!

https://www.reddit.com/r/RedLetterMedia/comments/6u3zse/half_in_the_bag_130_annabelle_creation/dlq31t3/?context=3

Sanderberg on the review embargo:

"I'm not involved in marketing or publicity (I wish! No more spoilery trailers) so I can't say what goes on there and I never heard anything about embargos. I would think there wasn't any because those first 18 reviews or so trickled in over the course of a couple of months. There wasn't like one chunk of positive and then a later chunk of negative.
The way I figure it goes down is that those first reviewers showing up are the ones who are into the genre and likely to come to screenings. Then as we're closer to release all reviewers go and see it, even the ones who hate horror and would have no interest in seeing it.
But again, I'm not involved in that stuff so it could nothing but shenanigans for all I know."

>>86476012
Anything you like, people on reddit like it too and praise it just like you do.

You really think there's this massive difference between 4chan and the rest of the internet? You're deluded.

>>86475241
what happen?
the first one was so fun, and the secuel was a giant piece of shit.

>>86471530
They loved Chronicle

File: duke_and_roadblock)gi-joe2_4.jpg (242KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 900x600px

>>86476143
tatum being killed off and replaced with
Dwight "The Boulder" Jackson

>>86476356
you mean Dwayne "boring movie" Johnson?

>>86476119
Useful idiot, studios love that.

But he needs to decide if he wants to be Warner's toyboy or if he wants cred with the indie reviewer crowd.

>>86472303
All of those movies are watchable, though. Might not be true quality cinema but they're crowdpleasers. A true Disney failure would have to be something that makes even children and normies hate it.

>>86475052
They said that in the Fantastic Four review though

>>86475910
>>86475972
RLM BTFO and sour hack grapes confirmed

>>86475288
>Logan Lucky out next week
Yes

>>86476043
this but unironically.

>>86476119
Haven't seen the rlm vid yet, but Anabelle Creation clearly premiered at LA Film Festival back in June, and had a 100% rating from critics attending months before the movie came out. Embargoes obviously exist, as evidenced by things like Emoji Movie and The Dark Tower, but Annabelle didn't have one.

>>86476253
>loved
No.

>>86476586
That page is stil up. You're like a little kid holding a grudge.

File: olum-alfabesi-kotulugun-baslangici-izle-725.jpg (54KB, 1777x891px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1777x891px

They have spoken positively about The Conjuring movies so I am supersized they didn't like Lights Out and the Oujia prequel as they were solid and slightly above average.

also Oujia Origins was LITERALLY about evil jew ghosts

>>86473334

No, but he rates stuff too lightly. Even stuff he rates C+ and below is loaded with pull-quotes for studios like "A lot of fun" and "A good time" which pretty much renders him irrelevant.