If I borrow a DVD off my friend and watch it, that's OK

>>86261985
There is no difference. Lars Ulrich is just mad he can't afford a bar next to the pool.

>>86262012
>next to

he already has five of those. His dream was a bar IN the pool.

How dare you take that from him?

>If I borrow a DVD off my friend and watch it, that's OK right?
It's not.

>>86261985
>that's OK right?
Why do you care OP? Are you a submissive cuck who depends on other people's opinions?

The DVD's I bought back then would have me believe in an unskippable sequence that it is illegal. Also pirates are evil and belong in a prison cell and sheit.

Good thing that bullshit film material is a thing of the past. :)
As is paying their greedy asses.

>>86262410

>legal rights
>opinions

keke

>>86262659

You could skip the warnings on DVDs but not BluRays.

>>86263142
Yes, legal rights are opinions.
Kind of like owning slaves was once a legal opinion, and now isn't.

>>86261985

>If I borrow a DVD off my friend and watch it, that's OK right?

No, that's against the license you agreed to when buying the DVD. Admittedly, you're not likely to end up in court over borrowing a DVD, but then again, how many people do you personally know that have ended up in court over copyright infringement due to file sharing?

>>86263258

Nothing in this post is based in reality. kys

>>86263297
Reality is that legal rights are not absolute;
as evidenced in them changing over time and differing from culture to culture and nation to nation.
Reality is that you are just butthurt.