I want a television series where all the dialogue is sharp and

Rick & Morty

>>86218300
The West Wing

>>86219146
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBohPAycB0w&ab_channel=MichaelPalmer&user=EthicsByDesign
Not sharp enough, seems overly verbose, I don't care for the subject matter, and I'm not interested in liberal propaganda. I appreciate the effort, though.
>>86219127
No.

The Parkview Pedo

>>86220449
>The Parkview Pedo
huh?

Gilmore Girls

>>86220570
>Gilmore Girls
I don't believe you.

>>86220624
Your loss.

>>86220659
Can you post a scene which exemplifies this sharp dialogue?

>>86220742
https://youtu.be/MFi-phC_048

>>86220908
This really isn't what I had in mind, at all, but I like the stilted, melodramatic delivery. I'll check our the series.

I can't really give a good description of what I wanted, but what would also interest me is a sitcom with the same elevated style of dialogue of something like Pride and Prejudice, (the BBC series), with the tone of 30 Rock, while in a modern setting. I doubt such a series exists.

>>86219127
Literally unironically this.

>>86218300
https://youtu.be/ZPHSXUS0_1c

>>86221089
What a waste of time your life is.

>>86221124
Literally, no. How the fuck would anything coming out of the character's mouths be considered "elevated?"

>>86221146
lel, fuck no.

>>86221184
lel, care to elaborate?

>>86221214
Your loss.

does VEEP count?

>>86221340
No.

>>86221296
I watched the first season of Reddit and Memey and stopped watching the second season when it was clear there was an immense drop in quality.

>>86218300
Mad Men
Breaking Bad
Empire

>>86221347
Your loss.

>>86221347

Why not? The impossibly witty dialogue seems "elevated" enough, and it is modern.

Do you even know what sharp dialogue is?

>>86221492
The first series that comes to mind is Yes Minister. That's almost too sharp. It qualifies, but I want something with a more engaging story.

>>86218300
>artificially elevated manner

elaborate

>>86221587
As in, nobody could really speak like that in real life. I had something more in mind like period dramas of Georgian stories, but those are more eloquent, than smart. The best example I can think of is Yes Minister, but want a series with a continuous narrative.

>>86221587
I think he means cyborgs who use linguistic AIs to improve their diction. Which is why no series listed has qualified.

>>86221702

smoke some weed and watch frasier

>>86218300
Red Dwarf

>>86220908
After watching some of the series, the story seems too soapy and mundane, and the dialogue isn't sharp or elevated enough.

>>86221736

jeez, its almost like its demographic is 13 year old girls

>>86221702
You realize writers stopped doing that because it sounds corny as shit, right? People only talk like that in musicals nowadays.

>>86221720
>smoke some weed
Is this suppose to lower my standards for dialogue, or is just a general piece of advice so I would relax more? I seriously don't know. Thanks, but I don't smoke.
>watch frasier
I've watched a couple of episodes and I don't see the appeal. It seems like a generic, yet somewhat pretentious sitcom. All the cleverness that people here rave about it for having seemed totally lacking in what I saw.

>>86219261
>I'm not interested in liberal propaganda
Then you should watch The West Wing.

Oh, sorry, I forgot you're retarded and see everything as black and white.

>>86221783
>it sounds corny as shit, right?
I think that depends on the context. Never when watching series that pull it off well do I think it's "corny." It doesn't, however, really work for stories that rely on "slice-of-life" stories, or more relateable humor.

>not deadwood
Luck
Carnivale
John From Cincinatti
Justified, I suppose

You like Guy Ritchie, don't you

>>86221916
he'll probably think of some bullshit excuse why he won't like any of those

>>86221818
>I forgot you're retarded
No problem.
>see everything as black and white.
I've seen enough of the The Newsroom to realize what the creator's shtick is. Also, while I realize it isn't that overt, what little I've seen of the series indicated it's liberal pandering.

>MUH SHARP DIALOGUE
>doesn't accurately explain what he wants

>>86221967
kek. I've actually never heard of any of them, which makes it harder for me to evaluate them.

>>86221999
Something like Yes Minster, but fewer gags, a more serious story, and a continuous narrative.
I know I'm not doing a good job, but I'm trying.

>>86222032
It's okay. You'll just watch a minute of something and decide it's not what you're looking for.

>>86222112
Do you really think I would watch an entire episode of each of those series? I am relying on the dialogue mostly, so I think I can pretty quickly determine whether a series is to my liking.

>>86221489
I could spend time trying to formulate why I don't consider it "sharp," but having "fuck," or "shit," in every sentence definitely keeps it from being elevated.

>>86218300
pushing daisies

>>86222501
>pushing daisies
This really isn't what I had in mind either, but this series seems really interesting, so I'll keep watching it. Thanks.

>>86222501
I'm actually really liking this series, and the dialogue in some ways is exactly what I wanted. Thanks a lot.

You are autistic.