Just got back from seeing this, I thought it was good.
What are your thoughts /tv/?
I want to fuck Sofia Boutella.
What will I think of it?
>>86190918
confirmed pleb
I heard the soundtrack was good can you confirm?
>>86190918
Any webms of the lesbian sex scene yet?
>>86191428
if like early 90s and 80s yes. I loved the soundtrack.
>>86191470
not sure, lucky it was dark in the cinema because I was chubbing.
Imagine John Wick but worse in literally every department.
Some nicely made brutal fights in this.
Also... dat 80s Berlin setting.
>>86190962
That should go without saying.
>>86190918
The action was good, but there wasn't enough of it. The story was bad, but the sex scene and the action made it an ok movie.
>>86191546
I know. Vaginas are icky.
>>86190918
The action scenes in the trailer looked fairly generic and the music was really off putting for the tone it looked like it was trying to go for. The only part that looked good was McAvoy, was he decent in his role? Did the film redeem itself from its trailer?
>>86191726
I get what you mean about the trailer but if they put the best bits in it, it wouldve spoiled the film.
But yeah the film definitely redeemed it self.
>>86190918
I really like the format where they interrogate the protagonist and the movie is basically flashbacks.
And most of the time they kept the action believable. As in, you don't just see Charlize pushing dudes twice her weight around with her bare hands
>>86192079
OP here
I agree with you on the action, however I thought the format with the interrogation sort of removed some of the tension of the action scenes with the pay-off for that format at the end being minimal.
>>86190962
Anon told me Charlize sucks on her nipple... I DIDNT SEE SHIT! Did no fap for a week to be ready for their scene together and it was PG not even 13 tier. I see better lesbian make outs on fucking Wynonna Earp!
>>86192246
Don't act like you didn't rub one out anyways.
>>86192246
Scene was super hot, I don't know what you're talking about
>>86192079
Lol are you serious? You did see that. I just assumed she had mild super powers
Anyway the plot was a bit of a mess
>>86193914
She constantly used whatever she could reach to her advantage, and disarming her opponent was the first thing she did
The only thing I didn't like is the bit that's also in the trailer, when she puts that scarf thing over her face to fight the 2 guards
>>86193670
Thats not the point!
>>86193740
Too much hardcore lesbian porn has ruined me.
>>86193914
>Anyway the plot was a bit of a mess
What i get wasshe was a double agent (russian spy working as a brit spy), but was in fact a tripple agent (defected to America)
>>86190918
>WOMAN LEAD
>NOT A MOVIE ABOUT COOKING AND SUCKING DICK
UM NO SWEETIE
>>86190918
>paying to watch a movie
I cannot believe anyone on /tv/ actually does this
>>86190918
I had a good time, thats all i was expecting from it. Worth my money and that like ten minute long one take scene was great. Anyone actually know it if was one take? Or did they use those birdman type cuts. Either way very entertaining. May be an autist but I didn't really follow with the story too well.
>>86190918
honestly i saw the trailer and i couldnt give a fuck just like i didnt with Baby Driver
>>86190918
>muh stronk sexeh woman beats up the men
Dropped.
dude triple agents america go usa lmao
first 30-40 minutes were dull, slow burn gets more interesting as the flick progresses, down to earth and well done action scenes (despite the "all one take" meme), unnecessary extra endings (should have placed one or two more subtles hints to alliances elsewhere in the film then end it with the queen line).
overall solid but people might get mad that it pulled a marketing switcheroo (slow spy shit instead of straight action).