>google "Harry Potter kino" >this film comes

not highest degree but tier 1.5 kino fo sho

>>86162319
>bland dimming filter on everything

>>86162373
>talking about the filter like a pleb
The lighting is natural and looks nice. Its a bleak somber film and the dp is portugese. The film does actually look beautiful at times

File: 1453656323224.jpg (1MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1588x2862px

>>86162319
"Kino" is not how I'd describe one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: hallows1.2.jpg (2MB, 5760x2400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5760x2400px

>>86162360
Alright my nigga. What are your other fav wandkinos. Alternate grid.

>>86162454
Yeah, sure, totally naturally lighting on that center image with bright blue sky.

@86162458
every thread, why doea his guy actually hate that harry potter has kinos

>>86162458
Why did he rate Great Gatsby so high? Was it because of muh American dream?

And why does he rate The Sound and the Fury so high yet put stuff like TKAM or david copperfield so low? It's like he knew he wanted to put atlas shrugged and the stranger at the top and then just randomly threw together a list. probably why he thinks fucking don quixote is of the same quality as the brothers karamazov.

>>86162319
Prisoner of Azkaban is the best Harry Potter movie and it's not close, but Deathly Hallows Part 1 is the second best

>>86162458
based dullest-franchiseposter

File: IMG_1243.gif (240KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 320x320px

>>86162458
Yikes you have bad taste. I'd spend less time on making internet cool guy charts and actually reading books bb.

>>86162545
>armchair dp
The film looks beautiful and paintesque even at times shitposter

File: 1493497441255.jpg (77KB, 988x858px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 988x858px

>google "pleb shit"
>picture related comes up
Huh

>>86162657
They are different kinds of films so its hard to directly compare and of course they have a happy and sad ending. But yea they are probably my favorite two. I also like some others a lot too tho.

>>86162719
I'd go back to red dit you fucking retard

He is the best fucking poster on this board

>>86162816
Kys he is one of the worst on this autistic dull board.

>>86162458
>>86162598
>>86162670
>>86162719
You've been gone long enough for more retards to fall for this.
Welcome back.

>>86163067
He hasn't been gone though..