Zack Snyders only good movie is 300. His visual style is overreliant on CGI, a technology that only looks good in motion with a lot of blur.
Good action scenes need both fast action and slower moments to build tension, which Snyder achieves by the use of slow motion. In 300 this works because there aren't very many moving parts, it looks artful with the silhouettes and the shining red capes. Compare this to the slow motion in sucker punch, while it does slow down the action it turns it into a nauseating experience with clutter abound and seemingly nonsensical slow motion sequences.
I believe he should move away from superhero movies and more into action scenes where the terrain is more monotone, like in medieval movies or historic epics.
>>86107227
300 wasn't even good
>>86107227
I liked Dawn of the Dead better.
>>86107330
no. that's a shite film
Snyder filmography ranking:
>Good
Watchmen
Dawn of The Dead
>Medicore
300
Man of Steel
Guardians
>Dogshit
BvS
Suckerpunch
>>86107417
You're thinking of the original, mate.
>>86107227
>CGI, a technology that only looks good in motion with a lot of blur.
Scorcese's Casino (as one example) was dependent on recreating 70s era Las Vegas as a static vista of CGI, so you already fucked up in the first sentence.
But you kept typing.
the only bad zack snyder film is sucker punch, kys OP
Stop saying kino.
>>86107542
I would swap BvS with Guardians, but other than that, spot on.
What did the mentally ill tripfag mean by this?
http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/cgi%20300/username/killkid/
>>86109336
based KILLKID