>First Harry Potter >Troll gets into the dungeons >The

>>86064243
Feral Trolls are bad.

>>86064243
stop wasting your time with things like this
you faggots don't have any self respect

>>86064243
not all trolls

>>86064243

Third reply
OP is a fag
I trolled you

>>86064243
>police dog saved my dad on 9/11
>feral dog bites me on the ass
???

>>86064243

racist

It was social commentary on the notion that the same traits that make blacks violent and unpredictable also give them a place in society as security and guardians

>>86064243
They're neither good or bad, only DULL

>>86064243
This is the problem with you fucking cis white males, you assume just because one troll sneaks into the bathrooms that all trolls are bad
#trolllivesmatter

File: 1501710434999.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

You needn't worry about that pesky troll. OR that pesky dungeon, for that matter. After all, they're both part of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: 1446318641964.gif (4MB, 347x244px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 347x244px

>>86064576
everytime this picture changes

File: didntRead.gif (2MB, 317x178px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 317x178px

>>86064576