Can you even name a more Tragically written character? Proba

File: ocelot.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>85934421
Revolver Ocelot

File: dead inside.jpg (189KB, 1378x778px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1378x778px

Have you heard the complete story of moot? It's one of the saddest things around
no author could come up with this mans terrible luck

File: 1497754313243.jpg (512KB, 1620x2884px) Image search: [Google]

512KB, 1620x2884px

he was a masochist cuckold that watched over his ex-childhood love's husband's son and he also starred in easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: Cry3.gif (1MB, 268x150px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 268x150px

>>85934421
Rocket's up there at 90-100% Suffering as well.

>>85934421

The Doctor. Wipes out his entire species/planet for the good of the universe/time and has to live with the guilt.

Then in the 50th anniversary ep he saves them but because of timelines and stuff he believed he still wiped them out and had to live with thinking he did it, either way it's tragic.

>>85934837
t. mouthpiece

That being said, I hate the series too.

>>85935224
The movies were bad but I loved the books.

>>85934421
He's a perfect written Cuckold Cowboy in a horrible written franchise.

>>85934421
the writing certainly was a tragedy

>>85934837
>"No!"

ERRY DAMN TIME