30 minutes in now. Jesus christ, what a shit show... Why does

>>85748759

YAAAAAAAAAS SLAY KING

>>85748759
People pretend to like this for some reason

This movie was fucking badass. Piss off numale cuck

>stopping half an hour into somethign to shitpost online

do people really have this short an attention span that they can't watch something and not be online at the same time.

it must be awful.

>>85749080
There's literally nothing wrong in having short attention span

>ok arthur, I want you to tell me a meandering story that has practically nothing to do with the plot, but make sure to say it super fast
>aright well we wus on our way to see our mate george
>Which George? Fat George, King George, George Costanza, Paul George, George Bush, George Lucas, GRRM, I'm rattling off lots of names that clearly have nothing to do with what you're saying, that makes it witty

I wanted to strangle whoever was writing that godawful fucking dialogue, hell, whoever wrote that whole sequence, I've never been so annoyed at a movie before.

>>85749145
fuck off, it was kino

>>85749080
I can tell you that the characters are bland and underdeveloped, there's an overreliance on cinematography that isn't well executed and fantasy tropes without anything new or original brought to the table.

Infact i couldve told you that 5 minutes into the movie, but chose to wait and see if it could redeem itself.

>hurr durr you can only tell if a movie is good if you see all of it

>>85749145
This. I'm not sure if Ritchie not self aware at all or producers force him to do it

>>85749145
if only they cast jason statham as that knight guy

>>85748759
Also, does this movie have a single scene that isn't "inspired" from a GoT scene?

>>85749346
Does this movie have a single scene that is "inspired" by Game of Thrones? I thought it was a bad movie, but ripping off Game of Thrones isn't one of its flaws at all.

>>85748759
Is this the film by Guy Ritchie? his films are fucking awful and all the same.

>>85749019
are there blacks in it or something? Reviewers love films with diversity.

>>85749729
There's blacks, but critics tore it apart anyway

>>85749729
Reviewers hated this movie.

>>85749729
>>85749777
>are there blacks in it or something? Reviewers love films with diversity.


blacks and even a VELLY VELLY GUD chink

>>85749145
That was indeed the worst part of the movie. And the sped up growing up montage.

After that it was passable desu.

>>85749833
Badlands triple montage was atrocious. And last 20 minutes is cutscenes from generic fantasy videogame-tier

watched again today. didn't even notice beckham the first time.

File: images (13).jpg (31KB, 313x470px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 313x470px

You watched the wrong movie

>>85749893
>Badlands triple montage was atrocious.
Right? It came out of completely nowhere.

>by the way I can teleport people
>and I'm going to teleport you to this magical land where there are giant bats, snakes, and spiders
>and you have to go get the crap kicked out of you by them for a while, it's not like we're pressed for time with the whole evil king building a tower thing

The worst part is that the wizard girl who can't act or speak English clearly knew fucking everything and didn't say a word. She basically gave the entire audience an exposition dump halfway through the movie, most of which probably wasn't necessary because it was implied to begin with. How many dicks did she suck to get those extra lines?

>>85749976
I watched that one before actually, and liked it.