so why was this movies pacing so bad? the beginning was amazing,

the ending was the best part you american prole

>>85616504

Yeah great ending, one stuka tries to kill some people and gets shot, BRAVO NOLAN. Bullshit

>>85616437
Movie is overhyped shit, 5/10 at best.

Only nolan drones like this garbage

I liked Air Bane though

It was the same schtick over and over again.

>confused people running around
>music builds up
>shit goes down
>tragic aftermath
>repeat

Maybe he film would've been stronger if it focused on the airmen
Lord fucking knows the best aspects were the air scenes
They dress nice
And the tension of getting on target was nice if at least bizarre because there was 0 leading
Also those schellbomber turret cannons sounded great

>>85616909

i would almost say that they should have shown more people being attacked constantly, being under constant fear wasn't really something i felt during the movie. this fucking movie is just about people being rescued and even nolan should have known that this doesnt sound interesting if you do so little with it. The scale he worked with was just way too small.

This is probably the first war movie I've seen that doesn't clearly depict any enemy casualties. Only planes being gunned down, we never see on-foot gunfire exchanges or hand-to-hand combat, with enemies.

Dunkirk is about the internal struggle of war, and probably something about the Englishe Spirit and beans on toast and whatever. OI IT'S SEVEN BONG