In your opinion Was it forced the relationship between ron

Yes. It literally was. J.K. "Hack" Rowling even admitted she only did it to subvert the expectation of Hermione and Harry getting together, even later claiming to regret the decision.

DULLEST

>>85610044
Ron had zero likable traits in the movies. It's not just perplexing that he ended up with Hermione, but that he was friends with Harry at all.

>>85610044
It reminded me of my tsundere animu romances so for me it felt obvious they were gonna end up together

>>85610441
that's bullshit

>>85610044
Ron and Hermione just screams abusive relationship to me. Like I can't imagine Ron being satisfied in their marriage.

File: 11124.jpg (2MB, 1616x2864px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1616x2864px

All the character interactions were forced and inane, just like you'd expect from one the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>85610044
in my opinion, harry potter is for children and emma watson has disgusting feet
nice english btw my pajeet friend

>>85610441
>tfw the movies removed all of Ron's good bits

>>85610044
>Gabber