>The lackadaisical pulchritude of the opening scene belie

HE ACTUALLY DID IT! THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN!

File: smug fox.jpg (48KB, 560x577px)

48KB, 560x577px

>>85572144

I love how he writes

He's like a middle schooler with a fetish for thesauruses.

>>85572144
This is a man of unparalleled genius.

>>85572144
>traditionalist Christian themes
He does know that this movie was literally created by liberals, right? Hell, miller even said that the movie was targeted towards young kids so they can develop progressive values

File: 1394235186484.jpg (15KB, 262x228px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 262x228px

>An avuncular side character in the shape of the aging Patrick Stewart playing a gleefully nihilistic faecal blob hammers home the generational judgement

>>85572490
If you don't understand Armond's game by now, you never will. Hint: it's not pure contrarianism. There's a method to his madness.

>>85572144
>pulchritude
>raconteurish
>avuncular
>nihilist
>traditionalist
This shitskin sounds like an 8th grader trying sound really smart
No wonder /v/edditors jerk off to him so much

HE ACTUALLY DID IT THE MAD MAN

>>85572584
based nigger

he's the james joyce of film critics. it's too hard for your simple brain to comprehend

>>85572584
>he thinks any of these basic words are out of the ordinary
>lists fucking traditionalist in his "muh big words" list
How does it feel to be a slack jawed low prole mental midget

>>85572584
that's ironic. imagine being so dumb you can't tell OP wrote all that.

>>85572584
>This shitskin sounds like an 8th grader trying sound really smart
>No wonder /v/edditors jerk off to him so much
He didn't post an actual review. OP just made it up.

When he trashes that movie for being millennial garbage you are gonna feel pretty stupid OP.

>>85572550
this is wrong
he really despises nihilistic works and likes movies that deal with morals

File: 1500319562688.png (36KB, 498x500px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 498x500px

>>85572584

So far he is ignoring it. The movie is getting a fate worse than death.

>U reveal Ur idiocy by caring about Emoji movie rather than Valerian.
What did he mean by this?

>>85572442
>I didn't understand some of the words, therefore the author must be the stupid one