What was his final name? Was each movie separate from each other,

They were separate, it was the American distributor that promoted it as a trilogy, this was not Leone's intention at first but he went along with it.

>>85418150
Wrong.

>>85417871
They're connected as in they're happening to the same character. but he's such a loner that his history doesn't really cohere into anything, so don't look for patterns, it's just three adventures of a bad motherfucker. More like how John Wayne's character in Hawks' last three Westerns is the same character but with different names - they don't cohere as a story but they're obviously three of a kind.

>>85418359
>Although it was not Leone's intention, the three movies came to be considered a trilogy following the exploits of the same so-called "Man with No Name". The "Man with No Name" concept was invented by the American distributor United Artists, looking for a strong angle to sell the movies as a trilogy. Eastwood's character does indeed have a name (albeit a nickname) and a different one in each film: "Joe", "Manco" and "Blondie", respectively.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollars_Trilogy

>>85418529
Well that clears it up.

>>85417871
Blondie Usonava Ayieyaiyieyaiii. I think its Comanche.

OFFICIAL LEONE RANKING:
1. Once Upon A Time In America - 11/10
2. Once Upon A Time In The West - 10/10
3. The Good, The Bad & The Ugly - 10/10
4. For A Few Dollars More - 9/10
5. Duck, You Sucker - 9/10
6. A Fistful Of Dollars - 8/10
7. The Colossus Of Rhodes - 6/10

>>85417871

A staggered past of one character who is not necessarily the same person - just a legend. Doesn't really matter anyway since the stories are completely disconnected.

File: 1492654484106.png (526KB, 800x587px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 800x587px

>>85418760
>Duck You Sucker not 10/10

>>85418760
>11/10
cringe dude

Think of it like Mad Max continuity

He works with the Man in Black ("Angel Eyes") in For a Few Dollars More and the Man in Black appears to recognize him in The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, suggesting that they are connected.

>>85419649
kys then

>>85418760
Once Upon in the West fucking blows

>>85417871
>"Monco" is officially not the same character as "Joe" in A Fistful of Dollars (1964). This was the finding of an Italian court that adjudicated the lawsuit brought by Jolly Films, producer of "A Fistful of Dollars". After the release of the first film, director Sergio Leone had a falling out with the producers and made this sequel with a different producer, Alberto Grimaldi. Jolly Films sued, claiming ownership of the "Joe" character, but lost when the court decided that the western gunfighter's persona, characterized by the costume and mannerisms, belonged to the public domain's folklore.

I've got to get around to watching the Dollars Trilogy one of these days