>there are "humans" on this board that think Citizen

File: 1498399781916.png (656KB, 779x540px) Image search: [Google]

656KB, 779x540px

>there are "humans" on this board that think Citizen Kane is Orson Welles' best movie
>there are "humans" on this board that don't realize that the television directors of today's focus on plot and dialogue over the communication of emotion and narrative through images is literally destroying cinema
>there are "humans" on this board that think that Damien Chazelle is anything more than a television-tier hack who steals ideas from much better sources and is only praised at all because he's slightly better than your run of the mill indie film school graduate
>there are "humans" on this board that still take the word of internet shill "critics" who profligate the latest and greatest big budget comic book schlock in a console wars mudslinging contest when their cinematic experience amounts to today's television movies and 80s action and horror
>there are "humans" on this board that reject the dramatic use of color, dramatic angling, lighting and varied levels of focus in preference to the slick 80s "everything is flat, everything is focused, everything's lit like a stage play" commercialism style
>there are "humans" on this board that think that James Cameron is anything other than the human quarter pounder of filmmaking
>there are "humans" on this board that haven't seen a Wong Kar Wai film
>there are "humans" on this board that haven't seen a Samuel Fuller film
>there are "humans" on this board that think "Style over substance" is a valid criticism in an aesthetic medium
>there are "humans" on this board that don't recognize Steven Spielberg as one of the great prolific American filmmakers
>there are "humans" on this board that think that Kubrick was the be-all and end-all of "great filmmakers"