This is the lowest rated marvel flick and it's still higher

Nothing is lower than a fat shut-in.

File: 1hlgkw.jpg (23KB, 590x312px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 590x312px

>>85389168
>problematic message

Why was it so problematic?

>>85389248
Why are you talking to yourself?

>>85389168
It is well known Disneyy bribes lesser known bloggers and youtubers. RT does not factor individual prestige.

>>85389248
>>85389318
Disgusting samefag.

>>85389248
it doesn't even elaborate so no idea

>>85389248
probably because it portrays retards as capable

File: IMG_9429.png (372KB, 370x520px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 370x520px

>>85389168
>lowest
Thor 2 was 66% lil nigga

>>85389248
Because it portrays women as the whores they are.

When did Rotten Tomatoes go to shit? I dont remember it being so crucial to have a high RT score but now they even advertise it in the trailers so people know for sure its certified. RT ruined movies

>>85392201
just check the new ghostbusters rating and all will be revealed

>>85392201
What are your top 10 films of this decade so far?

>>85389168
>gladiator only 76%
i'm fucking triggered

File: marvel.jpg (806KB, 2346x1692px) Image search: [Google]

806KB, 2346x1692px

>>85391944
dont worry caption tits just signed up to save the ?MCU