Can you have a scene with vibrant color but still have serio

of courshe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFzLHxvbYD0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scmHVYYZZ3w

>>85322112
Stargate Harry Potter crossover when?

>>85322112
The first two films are entirely tan/orange and blue. They hired professional dps for every single one and besides 2 and 4 and 78 they were all different dps. They all look really nice and match the tone. Making them brighter doesn't make it better. They looked great in theaters and the new 4K with HDR make them look just like they did in theaters.

>>85322112
>clearly you haven't watched the devils
>clearly you wouldn't have started this thread if you know which scenes i am suggesting at

File: 1475130597970.jpg (2MB, 1620x2884px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1620x2884px

Vibrant colors could spice it up and this goes directly against the whole concept of the Harry potter saga. The whole saga being constructed as the foundation for a 4chan pasta that suscitate lots of laughters remarking that this is one the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

@85324146
Christ /tv/ is in shambles, nuke it.

>>85324202
thanks anon

@85324202
Autism

>>85324202
A rough start but you managed to work with it, good job, 7/10

>>85324260
>>85324232
Why are you doing this anon

>>85324202
based

>>85322112
>J.K approved this cover illustration
>"I never stated hermione was white in the canon xD"

>>85324202
>"No!"

You owe me a pair of sides, my dear tripfag

File: 1370239837753.gif (488KB, 499x367px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 499x367px

>>85324202
>Rand

>>85326599
Quit breathing, retard.