>it's just Drive for Babies, hence the name It makes

>>85276784
I dug it because music syncing to action beats is my fetish (that Hocus Pocus scene is kinography).

Characters were a bit underdeveloped though, and it felt like it was missing the same spark I got from his previous movies.

Still one of the best of the summer though.

>>85276784
Isn't Drive already Drive for babies?

>>85276784
So this. It felt like drive made by Marvel studios. Bright and colorful. Almost endless quipping. Characters that never leave an impression on you except Jamie Foxx of course.

>>85276784
Buddy was easily the best part of the movie

Why did Kevin Spacey hire Jamie Foxx when it was extremely obvious he's very unprofessional and highly unstable?

It was a chill movie. Also, I suffer from tinnitus and it was funny to see a movie character with the same problem. All though he's probably making it worse by constantly blasting music in his earbuds

>>85276784
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA9lfxbaHvk

>>85276899
>>85276784
I think it just wasn't as "edgar wright" as his other movies. There weren't as many really creative edits. It was shot mostly like just a normal movie.

There's nothing particularly bad about, just not as much good as his others.

>>85277777
Nice digits

>>85277778
Stop posting your shitty videos here.

I enjoyed it but I expected some kind of crime thriller because all I knew going in was the main character was a get away driver. My main gripe was how cartoonish the characters seemed in ways.

>>85277760
The whole movie made no sense

>>85277894
edgar wright made the movie

It's a fun movie
that's it

File: 3gpihprg5hbfa0gcxeqymimsz376505720.2.jpg (19KB, 319x480px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 319x480px

>>85277778
>>85278027

i might have to tell your parents you've been posting some naughty things and saying the n-word online, Alex. you still live with them right?

>>85276784
Baby isn't as autistic as Driver.