So I read that Tamzin Merchant (such a silly name) was originally

Never seen her act in anything, but I'd guess the median acting talent of all actors is greater than Clarke's, so I'll just say yes.

>>85245554

she's certainly cuter than Clarke. Also, she's usually typecast as naive so it would have been a bit more in tune with book-Daenerys

>>85245574
>certainly cuter than Clarke

She looks like the alien from Splice. Fuck outta here

>>85245574
God forbid they're in tune with the books

File: sg7PAPNe.jpg (32KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x500px

>>85245574
>she's certainly cuter than Clarke
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

>>85245498
>(such a silly name)
Why?

>there's an alternate world where we got to see tamzin's tight ass every season

>we get emilia clarke's

>>85245683

it sounds like an NPC in some rolepalying game that sells you arrows and shit

>>85245498
ayy lmao

>>85245498
Would she have been willing to get her tits and vagoo out for all to see?

>>85245744
One of those games made by Americans that use British names for anything medieval?

>>85245769
I think she was already full nude in Tudors.

>>85245498
Daenerys would have been less of a meme and more of a character. I wouldn't had worked with the GoT fanbase.

>>85245498
she looks like a retard. the only person who should've been cast for daenerys is holly earl

She has the otherworldly beauty of a Targaryen, of course. Clarke got the gig because she can out-schmooze literary anyone.

Probably. Clarke is annoying and chubby.

>>85245498
yeah she's got that otherworldly look to her that targs are meant to have but emilia clarke is undoubtedly hotter.

why did they fire her?

>>85245860
She was underaged while season one and two were in production. So no nudity would have put some problems to the role.

>>85245925
Emilia Clarke let D&D put it wherever they wanted.

>>85246018
>They each got an Eyebrow job.

Lucky buggers.

>>85245498
AHAHAHAHAHAHA

LOOK AT THE TOP OF HER HEAD

>>85245498
no, they would have directed her just as poorly as they did emilia

>>85245498
She'd still have to deliver those endless 'muh badass' speeches but then again if she did Dany justice they might write more interesting scenes than that in response.

>>85245498
lmao she was terrible in tudors.
and she's ugly af. thank god they recast her

>>85245574
>>85245650

This, fucking lol

>>85245498

>that Gal Gadot forehead

At least she doesn't have mud eyes

>>85245574
>she's certainly cuter than Clarke
rofl
>she's usually typecast as naive so it would have been a bit more in tune with book-Daenerys
well script is written by d&d not grrm. it's not emilia's fault they changed her character.