What should the BBC do to fix the gender pay gap? This is a

>>85175785
I think "huge scandal" is slightly overstating it

>shat on pitch
>get paid

Brilliant.

It's simple. Make women funny.

>>85175785
Hire entertaining women.

the government should fund education more so we can develop more intelligent, entertaining and funny women, who can then compete with male entertainers. at present there's no way around the problem without lowering the quality of content

>>85175834
It's on the front page on every huge newspaper

Good thing america has laws that prohibit against gender pay discrimination since 1963 thanks to Kennedy and you can always call on the government to report it if you believe you are being paid unfair due to sex the government will investigate it and you can sue them now thanks to Obama.

>>85175893
60% of universities in Britain are filled by Women.

There are more women than men in higher education now

>>85175898
wow, must be a slow news day, or something scandalous is happening they're trying to hide

>>85175785
>BBC actually pays top dollar for the new Top Gear

Why?

>>85175919
All studying psychology and Art so we can have a steady supply of baristas.

>>85175785
>only a third of top 96 are female

That's not bad, what the fuck do they want?

I like Graham

>>85175898
>reading newspapers in 2017

literally who does this?

fire all women

>>85175947
based gayman

>>85175970
Millions of people do?

>>85175785
They could hire women who are actually worth a bucket of shit and not just gormless leftist drones. These male presenters are crap too, they are just slightly better than any female currently employed by the BBC. Really though, the whole organisation needs tearing down and all Leftist perverts shooting for subverting culture and making everything dumber and uglier.

File: 21. The Mainland.mp4_snapshot_15.26_[2017.02.05_15.36.11].jpg (32KB, 720x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 720x400px

>>85175947
>people don't like Graham

If someone in the entertainment business is popular, you pay therm more. Men and women both watch TV/movies and therefore both contribute to an entertainer becoming famous.

>media cocksuckers trying to make this about muh wage gap to distract from the fact that every year 30,000 working-class men and women are given a criminal record as a result of non-payment of the license fee just so Chris fucking Evans can have a TWO POINT TWO MILLION POUND salary

>>85176025
Chris Evans is the highest paid and literally nobody likes him

File: 1266640678297.jpg (16KB, 271x279px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 271x279px

>>85175893
>educating someone to be funnier

>gender pay gap
>for celebrity jobs
YOU GET PAID ON POPULARITY YOU DUMB CUNTS
that being said I think all actors and actresses are getting too uppity and demanding too much for a bunch of spergs who play dress up and pretend for a living, we should remind them romans use to feed them to large cats for entertainment, and it's starting to look like we'd get more entertainment that way than listening to their whinging

an issue about class is spun into a gender thing.

hmmm...The problem is that anyone for a public broadcaster is being paid hundreds of thousands of pounds.

Liberal feminism (we need more women exploiters) is not helping this.

t. feminist.

>>85175919
Diversity quotas, and education is more worthless every year. There are teens in college right now who have suffered so much from broken families and an education ruined by Leftist culture, that despite being perfectly physically healthy, they have the educational level of 5 year old children.

t. Teacher

Once again the BBC damage control team has done an excellent job on spinning this scandal in the least harmful way possible. Instead of this being a conversation about the massive class and wealth disparity that exists in the UK (and particular the wealth divide between London and the regions), they have successfully diverted all debate into the fruitless angle of 'discrimination'. People should be asking, why are talentless hacks being paid millions with extorted public money, but instead the feminist rage machine has revved up into full gear to demand that the women be paid the same, equally ridiculous amount of money as their worthless male coworkers.

Well done BBC. If they survived the Jimmy Saville scandal this is like a light breeze by comparison.

>paid millions out of the taxpayer's pocket
>involved in tax avoiding scheme
>lectures everyone about refugees

Lineker is such a cunt.

>>85176085
>t. feminist

*tips fedora*

>>85176022
aspect ratio

File: hmm.png (198KB, 550x535px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 550x535px

people still own a tv

>>85176105
Anyone who makes /pol/ this bootyblased is based in my book

>>85176049
if you aren't intelligent the chances of you being (intentionally) funny are slim

>>85175919
like I said, we should be funding education. I don't know if social science at third rate universities really qualifies

What kind of honest to God retard watches Match of the Day because a crisp salesman is presenting it

Don't try and tell me that you couldn't pay Gaz from the pub £25,000 to present it

>>85176085

this

there are too many upperclass males

someone please think of the upperclass women!

>>85175785
Maybe women should try to be better at generating views. There is no gender pay gap. There is a huge skill gap between men and women. Women just aren't skilled at anything except birthing/rearing children. I am saying this 100% unironically.

>>85176133
>/pol/ boogeyman
takes your meds

>>85175970
Fuck off, idiot

>>85176145
whatever happened to fanzone

>>85176183
t. MGTOW virgin

>>85176085
>hey guys, true leftist here
>haha liberals really are the problem, they aren't true leftists
>btw everything is a class struggle xD

Fuck off teenaged commie.

File: 1266642446058.jpg (19KB, 297x294px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 297x294px

>>85176138
>education = intelligence

>>85176048
Chris has somehow sussed it.

>Be a talentless unlikeable fuck ugly gobshite
>Fail at every solo venture you set out on
>Fail at everything else too
>Get handed the fucking breakfast show on the most listened-to radio station in the country
>Proceed to shit it up for years
>Somehow get the job as a new Top Gear host
>Fuck it up so badly that he manages to get fired after one season
>Still command a higher salary than anyone else
>Career appears to have no brakes

He must have some dirt on all the BBC execs, there's no other explanation.

Women just don't draw the same amount of audience as most men do.

Surely this bleating about the wage gap is only going to mean that absolute mongs like Victoria Derbyshire are suddenly going to get a 500% salary increase, so that next year when the figures roll round again people are going to be even more outraged?

Like, they're not going to bring the men's pay down to equalise it (or else they'll release details of the BBC's child sex parties which is honest to god the only reason I can think of for these salaries), so they'll just push the women's up

>>85175943
It's not even funny man. Ask any girl in any class what they are majoring in and they will say Psychology. I'm taking a summer course right now, and the 4 girls in front of me are all majoring in Psychology.

>>85175785
Gary Lineker I understand because he's their most valuable asset in the war against Sky's far superior football coverage, but why the fuck is Chris Evans paid so much?

>>85176145
match of the day is watched all over europe

>>85176138
>being funny requires intelligence
No.

>>85175834

The BBC often wants to portay itself as being superprogressive and egalitarian. This is like finding out the preacher is snorting coke of a whore's tits after each sermon.

>>85175785
>Gender pay gap

Name a single woman on the BBC roster that draws more viewers than Graham Norton or Gary Lineker

>>85176272
For the actual football, not Gary fucking Linekar

>>85176223
what exactly are you quoting? I don't think anyone has suggested that education is intelligence, that doesn't make any sense

>>85175785
Maybe they should up the TV license by 10% to accommodate this

>>85175785
Shitcan ALL the whites at BBC and watch it burn.

>>85176225
It's exactly the same as Jimmy Saville

>>85176285
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guIiQY6EDtY

>>85176133
I'm the complete opposite, because I'm not an absolute faggot.

>>85176216
>*scanning program*
>*no argument found*
>*use ad hominem autistically*
>MUH MGTOW

File: 1483959783709-tv.png (118KB, 1250x1250px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1250x1250px

>>85176133
>Stealing money from taxpayers is based because it makes /pol/ mad.

Are you retarded by any chance?

>>85176342
Not even close

>>85176319
It's tax funded so they could do that and operate just fine.

>We need to pay all this taxpayers money to secure the top talent or they'll all go to ITV!

Fuck that, cap their pay at £75000. Enough to live (very) comfortably in London. If they decide they're worth more and want to fuck off to the private sector, cut them loose and get someone else in. There's no shortage of people who would happily do the job and it's not difficult work.

The only one here that deserves his salary is based Norton because his show actually generates profit

The BBC needs to go private instead of public funding. This is fucking ridiculous

>>85176391
This would actually promote new talent. I like this.

Evans makes no sense at all, but there's no female presenter or actress who is as big as Graham Norton is for UK talk shows or Lineker is for sports.

It's not sexist to pay the biggest, most influential stars more to keep them working for you.

>>85176391
How hard can being a presenter actually be? Who cares if the talent is scoped by ITV, just pick one of the literal hundreds of NEETs with media degrees

>>85176241
This. Your average married couple in the UK sitting at home all prefer watching certain celebs over others. Most of them wil be men, and It has nothing to do with money. Women (mostly progressive twats) can't stand the fact that on the whole, they aren't as likable or funny as men. It's that simple.

>>85176391
this. don't care about the paygap, but there's nothing remarkable about those at the top. fucking chris evans?

this wouldnt be a problem if we just got rid of money altogether

It's bullshit really. They're pushing the "gender pay gap" meme, when in reality it's "why the fuck are these wankers getting paid this much money to do fucking nothing".

I'm 99% the BBC are trying to make it a gender issue instead of the real issue.

>be man
>have to be funny and interesting (and good looking) to attract woman

>be woman
>have to look good to attract man

Who would you rather watch on TV?

>>85176382
>operating just fine
>without any white handlers/tamers
I doubt it.

>>85176498
haha yeah man two's on that spliff

>>85176498
damn... that's deep...

>>85175898
Why? Is Love Island finished?

>>85175785
So making The Doctor a broad was all a ruse.

File: ed.png (84KB, 631x604px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 631x604px

>>85176503
>I'm 99% the BBC are trying to make it a gender issue instead of the real issue.

I'm 100% sure, because the director general was out before the figures were published talking about it and all of the presenters on radio 4 were talking about the gap instead of questioning the actual worth of their colleagues

the premise of complaining about the gap is that the salaries are in any way justifiable to begin with

Victoria Derbyshire on £250,000?

File: 56.png (15KB, 241x263px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 241x263px

>>85175785
Paying men less is where this is really going and you know it.

File: he-man.jpg (67KB, 683x681px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 683x681px

>>85176513
>be man
>have to be tall, ripped, funny and successful to get anywhere

>be woman
>just have to try and not stuff my face with sweets all day

pic mostly unrelated

File: edd.png (77KB, 579x604px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 579x604px

>£350,000 – £399,999: Vanessa Feltz

wew to the fucking lad

>>85176601
>All those actors in the top pay part
>I've heard of Tim Roth and that's fucking it

What are they getting paid for

File: 1425892494270.gif (137KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 250x250px

Why is the UK so cucked? and I thought America was bad. Can any Britbongs defend this?

>>85176653
>this is where your tax money goes

>>85175919
Because women are boring.

>>85176503
>"why the fuck are these wankers getting paid this much money to do fucking nothing"

This, it's public money and it's obscene the mjority of them are all pro-eu, pro-migrancy mouthpiece shills and I want them all to just fuck off

The BBC need to just fuck off, with its nepotistic dancing and cooking shows, cheap shite tv whilst the celebs are milking it.

I think the only BBC employee worth his money is Attenborough

>>85176653
>Chris Evans - 2.2m

Fuck this gay earth

>>85176145
Women and old people. Because he's non threatening and bland.

>>85176653
>Jeremy Vine getting £700k

To be fair I don't think I'd want to have to do his radio show for that much. Such utter mongs call in.

File: emm.png (86KB, 762x603px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 762x603px

>Andrew Neil in the same income bracket as Laura Kunnesburg
>former editor of the Sunday Times and chairman of the Spectator gets paid the same as a literal who diversity hire

>>85176601
>£200000+ for Ian fucking Beale

Gender pay gap confirmed for damage control. They want to turn this into a feminist issue rather than a 'holy shit why are we forced to pay these talentless shits so much money' issue.

>>85175785

>This is a huge scandal in the UK right now.

Everyone hates the BBC, and the smug, talentless twats that work there.

File: 133729446158623.jpg (94KB, 984x552px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 984x552px

>>85176723
Don't be rude about Laura, she's nice.

>>85176723
Neil needs a better fucking agent

>>85176653
damn really didn't expect lauren laverne to be competing with radio 1 presenters money-wise. good for her

>>85175898
It's summer. There's fuck all happening.

>>85176746
yeah because channel 4 and sky is soooo much better. Don't you have a TV license to pay?

>>85176653
>Chris Evans on £2.2 - 2.25m
>Steve Wright on £500-550k
>Vanessa Feltz on £350 - 399k
>Moira Stuart on £150-200k

fuck

me

I'm glad I don't pay the TV license and I'll never pay it again.

You lads know this issue riles the public up more than the expenses scandal but the media aren't willing to touch this with a ten foot barge poll except for the newspapers

I've seen a number of ITV/ITN, C4 and Sky people on twitter defending this shit, and the license fee

File: muh.png (225KB, 351x549px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 351x549px

Propaganda aint cheap!

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mbjl-bqzn9A

File: file.png (5KB, 214x235px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 214x235px

>>85176723
>Eddie Mair getting over £300k

The absolute cheek of it

>>85176653
>Feltz

Tfw some fat oppiniated cake-pig earns double the salary of the PM

>>85176034
>>85176034

>>85176133
>Haha Tyrone is based for fucking my wife because it gets /pol/ mad

>>85176809
>info wars not propaganda

>>85176849
women don't even look at me, checkmate /pol/tard

>>85176787
>>Steve Wright

That fucking unfunny twat with a moustache

Serious Jockin, Jockin with a G

Just fucking kill yourself Steve you unfunny tires wornout fat cunt

>>85176849
Nah. /pol/ doesn't care about fat pakis.

File: 1499515046277.jpg (111KB, 598x448px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 598x448px

>>85176216
>Haha this will show him

>>85176891
I don't know who the fuck likes him. His radio show is the most mind numbing bullshit that it gives me a headache whenever I hear it.

>>85175785
It's almost as if women are just inferior to men in all areas of life not related to giving birth, something men can't do.

>>85176816
How the fuck is she even still on the air? She says the same fucking things every single show.

Every. Single. Show.

The same. Fucking. Words. Every. Time.

I still have my clock radio set to Radio 2 because her morning show is the fastest way to actually coax me out of bed so I can escape her

>>85176875
what are you talking about? Its a clip from a british tv show where the presenters have mental break downs.

>>85176677
>>85176677
It must be what led to the fall of the roman empire.

When you are the biggest empire on Earth then next thing your forced to pay hacks to help destroy your country.

People on Twitch who stream games make more than BBC talent.

Really makes me think.

>>85176085
>The problem is that anyone for a public broadcaster is being paid hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Eh, IF that's what they'd get on commercial channels then I do want some decent presenters on the beeb, otherwise there's no point having it at all.

i'm actually surprised the bbc pays this much to its actors

>Claudia Winkleman on half a million pounds
>she presents a show that's on for 3 months of the year

>>85176935
the first 30 seconds of that clip maybe

>>85176928
>I still have my clock radio set to Radio 2 because her morning show is the fastest way to actually coax me out of bed so I can escape her

Kek'd

>>85176133
Nice argument. Here's a You.

File: 1498888604595.webm (3MB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 800x600px

Why don't they ever address the gender pay gap in adult entertainment?

File: 12312536.jpg (899KB, 2336x3504px) Image search: [Google]

899KB, 2336x3504px

How much does best girl get?

>BBC forced to reveal stars' salaries
>Everyone outraged at how much public money is pissed away to keep these talentless assholes when there are kids on Youtube who could host a better show
>BBC masterfully spins it into a gender inequality issue
>Everyone forgets about it the next day
>Nothing changes
>Chris Evans asks for and receives a pay rise to £2.5m

>>85176990
The full video is worth watching. The british TV presenter behaves like something from starship troopers. Screaming at his guest being totally reasonable but criticising islam.

>>85177027
She's Channel 4

>>85176498
Indeed, comrade!

>>85175785

Graham Norton is a clever gay. He also gets paid around 1 million through a production company.

>>85176285
Any of the women on Strictly?

>>85177034
Remember when so very breifly there was talk of a steriods scandle in soccar when lance amstrong was going down and suddenly all the headlines were about how racist soccar is? I do.

People still pay for the news but its not the people that consume it.

>>85176961
This guy gets it. All the Daily Mail-reading retards suddenly caring about nurses' pay when it's being compared to left wing celebrities are deliberately acting more retarded than they normally do.

As the BBC boss said, they don't exist in a vacuum and can't regulate the price of entertainers. That said, get rid of Chris Evans pronto. Lineker can stay.

>>85176961
Many of them said they'd be paid more on "private" channels.

File: wew.png (203KB, 635x407px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 635x407px

>one of the highest rated posts on the #bbctrend

OY VEY THE GOYIM KNOW

>>85177143
Create a special tax on the ultra rich.
>Omg our tv entertainers will go into excile and angrilly broadcast to us from France!

File: good luck.jpg (29KB, 426x268px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 426x268px

>>85175879

>>85176786
>Channel 4
There are no words strong enough to describe this gay, brown, trans-dumpster fire.

File: steve-wright-image-1-937847627.jpg (31KB, 615x492px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 615x492px

>>85176917

His show is just so tired and state, and hasn't changed since the 80's he's the Butlins/Pontis of radio, it's actually nice when he's off on his holidays and somebody else takes over like Craig Charles who doesn't talk over every song.


The wrong person passed away when John Peel died

The BBC could get rid of all their big name 'entertainers' tomorrow, replace them with media studies graduates on £18k and the overall quality would probably go up. Reading autocues, asking scripted questions with an RP accent and looking vaguely smart is not difficult skilled work.

I mean really, who would miss fucking Chris Evans if he left?

>>85177143
>As the BBC boss said

>>85177213
*tired and stale

File: 1491862365403.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>85176653
How do these people feel comfortable freely just gobbling up so much tax money and how the fuck do people still like some of these presenters for being so damn greedy?

Wasteful government spending makes me so fucking mad.

File: bbcpay.png (285KB, 952x524px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 952x524px

>p...please let us keep our jobs

>>85176875
Owen Shroyer's great, would rather see him host more often.

>>85177167
Let them. Maybe then the will be able to bring in some good talent who have some passion rather than money grubbing whores.

>>85176723
Alex Jones?????????????????

>>85177177
Lol are you deliberately acting retarded again. If BBC halved their best talent's pay, they'd just go to a competitor. It's not rocket science.

>>85176886
Oh damn, consider me btfo

>>85176278
>This is like finding out the preacher is snorting coke of a whore's tits after each sermon.
Does the bible say not to do that?

>>85176721
But he's SHIT on Eggheads.

>that cluadia bitch earns more than tess and the judges for strictly

ayyy

>BBC justifies the pay by citing market forces

I thought the whole fucking point of the BBC was to operate outside of the market

>>85177347

And what's wrong with that?

>>85175785
maybe hire women people want to fucking watch?

>>85177066
I thought Piers Morgan was supposed to be the "based" one for going after progressives. I guess when push comes to shove, he folds into another liberal wet blanket.

BBC hasn't made any quality entertainment since old Top Gear.

>>85177271
Do bongs really have a holiday celebrating paying their tv license? What a bunch of cucks.

>>85176811
I honestly can't even think who Eddie Mair is.

>>85177143
>BBC light entertainment
Generally trash, especially so since Top Gear got neutered. I'd bin it all to save money. Leave the shit telly to ITV and Channel 4.

>BBC dramas
Hit and miss but they're made on a shoestring and feature mostly no-name actors so they can stay.

>BBC News
All the hard work is done behind the scenes, so I'd keep all the current journalists and probably expand their department to improve quality. Fire the high-earning 'star' presenters and replace them with anyone who wants to do the job and can read. It's not a difficult job.

>BBC Sport
Sack Lineker and the other high earners or severely reduce their pay, see above. Pubs up and down the country are filled with guys who could do a good enough commentary job even while pished. Use the money saved to buy more cameras and support crew so they don't always miss the fucking action.

>>85177453
I have never seen him do that.

>>85177347
What competitor? The internet? TV is dying.

File: Ceefax page.jpg (51KB, 615x460px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 615x460px

>>85177271

>>85177347
So what? I'm assuming that BBC is funded by taxes. Wouldn't it be just good to let them go where ever. save some tax money and hire some new people.

I've no idea who those people on OP's pics are but they sure look like it's time for them to move forward.

>>85177347
If you tax entertainers more they will move to another british TV channel? I dont see how that is really a problem for the tax payer.

I think you misread my post.

>>85177143
If you're going to start using "the market" as an excuse then why not just privatise the fucking thing

What's the point in the BBC if it just acts like another competitor in the market?

>>85177226
>with an RP accent
If only.
Or should I say - If errrrrnleh.

>>85175785
>Huge scandal
>Gender pay gap
No the scandal is the fact these useless, worthless, talentless pieces of left wing trash get paid so much of MY MONEY!

>tfw I would do a political correspondent’s job for minimum wage

>pay gap
Is this another House of Cards case where the female gets paid less than Kevin Spacey but everyone refuses to acknowledge the fact he's a producer on the show, has more screentime, a bigger pull for the audience and has a larger portfolio of work than the female?
There's a pay gap between me and some of my colleagues at the firm I work at, maybe that's due to the fact they've been there years and I started in June? Nah, it has to be some discrimination at work.

>>85177213
What fucks me off about the radio salaries is that these are literally 2-hours-a-day jobs, they get paid a full-time wage for literally two hours of their time a day

>>85175935
It's still a big show, but is Chris Evans (not that Chris Evans) still on it? I know he's still on BBC radio.

>>85177793
It's the same with TV too, Match of the Day is on what, one day a week?

File: dream_c69d01c66c.jpg (61KB, 720x479px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 720x479px

>>85175946
marxism

>>85176776
>nothing happens in summer
There is usually a fuck-ton of shootings in the summer

>>85177842
No, he left after the first season he hosted. Rumor is that he and Matt LeBlanc did not get along at all.

>>85177793
To be fair it's not like they don't work something akin to a 9-5. They don't just show up 2 minutes before air time and just wing it then fuck off to the pub right after.

>>85177698
It has more freedom in what it can do, so it doesn't just have to shit out whatever Simon Cowell wants to keep its advertisers happy.

>>85177947
From the broadcaster that produces "The Voice" and "Strictly Come Dancing"

>Gary Lineker gets paid public money to live far away from the refugees he shills for on twitter whilst demanding the government use the working-class' money to bring in more refugees whilst berating what are his real paymasters for being nasty racists and there's literally nothing that can be done to stop this

I swear I live in some nightmare dystopic farce

Oh wait it's just the UK

File: 00damn3.png (11KB, 429x410px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 429x410px

>>85175785
>they're the network's biggest cash generatyoras
>IT'S SEXIST THAT THEY GET PAID MORE THAN WOMEN!

It's as fucking retarded as complaining that male models don't get paid what women-models get paid.

>>85177947
What actually creative thing has the BBC produced in the past 5 years

>>85177968
I'm not saying they shouldn't be doing it better.

>>85175785
>inb4 equal pay for all female 'talent'

Can't wait for the BBC Paywall

>>85177947
That clearly doesn't seem to be the case seeing as they are paying ridiculous salaries so their shitty presenters won't leave and take viewers with them.

File: de.jpg (198KB, 634x1158px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 634x1158px

Decent list

>>85176278
I might go to church if that was part of the sermon.

>>85178053
i like peaky blinders so there's that

that's bbc-produced right?

>>85178137
Good to see an Irish man being the highest paid presenter.

>>85176391
This is what I want for politicians. If you're getting your pay from the government(ie the people) you shouldn't be getting rich from it.

>>85178053
Attenborough docs? The Night Manager and some other dramas. MotD isn't worth Lineker's wage, but ITV's version was really crap.

>>85178204
ITV's version was crap because they didn't have half the content licenses

Because if we look at the actual statistics the highest earning ethnic group is "white" jews but to point that out is antisemitic

>>85175906
Obama isn't president anymore Libtard

>>85178196
There is an argument against that which I dont like but have to admit makes sense.
Well paid and well watched politicians should be less susceptable to bribes.

>>85176653
>Nicky Campbell is on more money than the Niel

>>85178123
ITV would put decent presenters on shit shows, though. As they do with Ant & Dec.

>>85176258
Any woman who wants to study psychology is a manipulative cunt.

>>85176223
This. intelligence = education + power
Black people cannot be intelligent.

>>85178137
Should be related to profit by programme to overseas / producer markets

>>85178247
Expenses scandal suggests they'll always take as much as they can get away with.

>>85178137
kek, I just realised Capaldi was so comparatively low because by definition the doctor is the most replaceable character on TV

>>85178137

Holy fuck. I don't care about footballers making millions. I don't care about zuckerberg making billions. But privatise this shit and get these fuckers off the gravy train.

File: bakerwho.jpg (26KB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 512x288px

Ah, /tv/, I know its hard to stay informed because cuck porn doesn't come with an educational supplement, so lets set some things straight:

1. BBC is not funded by taxes, it is funded by the license fee, which is what mommy and daddy pay each year if they own a TV. So Gary Lineker is not taking tax £££ that could be supporting your habitual unemployment.

2. The BBC operates commercially abroad, selling and licensing programmes to other broadcasters. It took in £1bn last year, no doubt in part because the BBC's actors and presenters are highly marketable.

3. You may not like/ consume the programmes, but most people on that list are involved with the BBC's most domestically popular output. So they're doing a good job, and being remunerated as such (again, not by taxes).

4. Chris Evans made his £££ from selling a production company to Virgin. Look it up.

Now, back to the highly informed and moderate gender debate...

>>85178247
Yeah, that's really the only argument against it. But that would be fixed by simply not allowing politicians to hide where they're getting money from as well as having strictly enforced bribery laws. Spend the money that is currently going to politicians on setting up a whole division just working with overseeing the accounts and investments of politicians(and their close relatives it might be hidden behind), so instead of lots of money going to the people at the top you're creating a whole bunch of new jobs with it.

As it is now politicians still take bribes or buy shares in companies based on how they're voting, so all that's really different is that they're taking more expensive bribes. Lowering their wage would actually be liberating in another way, because then the common man would also be able to bribe them with just an egg sandwich or something.

>>85178464
> Chris Evans made his £££ from selling a production company to Virgin.

Actually this list is solely about how much the BBC pays as a salary, hence why Norton for example is under-rated here because part of his salary is paid by a production company

Now back to plebbit

>>85178464
>which is what mommy and daddy pay each year if they own a TV

WRONG

you only pay if you use the BBC. You can have a TV and you can receive the BBC, but all you need to do is to claim that you don't don't use it and you don't get charged. There is no way that they can prove that you actually use their services.

t. has never paid for a TV license in his life

>>85178464
Scrap the license fee.

>>85175785
admit chris evans is a cunt so theres not really a gap

>>85176034
england: love it or leave it you cunt

>>85178552
>tfw my own state broadcaster is trying their hardest to jew money out of people

>n-no, i-if you own a computer with internet you have to pay the license fee due to streaming

>>85178574
In favor of what, taxes? Fuck that.
Well you could turn them into a commercial business I suppose since that's more or less what they already are. They just have the unfair advantage of being state sponsored.

>>85176278
>The BBC often wants to portay itself as being superprogressive and egalitarian. This is like finding out the preacher is snorting coke of a whore's tits after each sermon.
Wow, a joke against the Catholic church. We got an expert on comedy here folks. Fuck you.

The BBC is as hypocritical as the CBC in Canada. Gomeshi and Lloyd Robertson are both degenerates that were tolerated by this publicly funded Liberal mouthpiece bureaucracy.

>>85176278
>This is like finding out the preacher is snorting coke of a whore's tits after each sermon.
I think it's more like finding out everyone involved in the preacher's sect is fucking young boys.

>>85178508

Actually that was just a general information point for other anon's wondering how someone who looks like Ed Sheeran's alcoholic uncle could be so minted, rather than referring to his BBC salary. But I will take that (You) and give one back

Now, back to viewing the world through a smudged lens of impotent rage...

A third of the most talented people are women.

That has to be a result of sexism because there has to be just as many talented women as men.

>>85178702
Retard

File: TV-licensing-Customer-Service.jpg (136KB, 500x348px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 500x348px

>>85178552
Oh ok, so they don't have spectrometers that detect what you're currently watching by the light your tv emits through a window. Puts my mind right at ease.

>turn on public service radio
>it's a roastie with no charisma or humor wasting everyone's life talking about the her yesterday due to Marxist agenda
God forbids if we let entertaining people be the ones entertaining us. But no, let's force women into these professions they've always been shit and will always be shit at.

>>85178552
They're getting much more aggressive with it now and the private hire cue balls they get to bash on your door look in your windows and take pictures of your TV and if it has an aerial/sat port they can use it against you in court. Also they've made it apply to BBC iPlayer where it used to only be live TV and soon enough you'll be getting big monkey knobheads slamming on your door because you've got WiFi.

t. Student who's disputed TV licence necessity with the government

File: AmusedJohnnyDepp.jpg (153KB, 516x592px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 516x592px

>>85178666
>mfw my own state broadcaster tried to do that but got BTFO by the internet-companies and mass protest

I'd actually pay the BBC license fee, though. There's plenty of programs they make that I want them to keep making.My own state broadcaster just has shit ideas, when they're not just spending money on buying the viewing rights to British shows or remaking them in the worst of ways.

>>85175785
>gender gap.
Isn't it just a case of their highest paid staff are more famous and bring in the ratings.

Idk wtf chris evens does or claudia winkleman but I bet people watch chris evans show more

>>85178576
Oh shit! Kek

>>85176223
>i failed at education

>>85178833
It didn't go through in my country either, but it's just a matter of time. If not that some other bullshit.

Gonna find some way to fund all the refugees welcome propaganda.

>>85178817
Thing is though we literally don't use the BCC. My entire family steams YouTube or netflix.

They have been over to check, and have cleared us before. We do have an old Sky satellite dish, but it's not hooked up.

If you're dumb enough to be entertained by the BBC you deserve to pay desu.

But if they are the top draws then it makes sense they get paid the most.

>>85178739
They don't even need to be talented. Pay some douche 50k a year and they'll happily do the job of reading a teleprompter and 2 hours prep max.

Radio presenters have producers who sort all the content out for them, Jeremy Vine is only in the radio building 30 mins before his show starts.

Chris Evans literally does fuck all compared to Nick Robinson and Nick Robinson does fuck all compared to a producer and yet commands fucking huge wage.

If i was head of the BBC i'd be fucking gutting the shite waste of money on presenters and start making some good quality content for once

Oh yeah some shitty actor on Casualty (LITERALLY ONLY PENSIONER WATCH THIS SHIT) earns more than any other actor at the BBC and I bet it's minimum 10% of the entire shows annual budget.

>>85178911
I don't use the BBC either. Most people don't that I know really. They terrify stupid students with court summons and old people pay it just because it's tradition/habit.

>>85178741

Slow down there buddy, don't want to push the intellectual tone of the debate to the apogee just yet!

>>85175785
Britbong here.

This isn't a huge scandal.

No one cares.

No one's talking about it.

I didn't even know about it till I saw this thread.

Neck yourself.

>>85179020
>no-one's talking about it
>front page over every major paper's website rn

>>85179005
Typical government milking the unaware.

File: Gary Linigger.png (671KB, 1048x616px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 1048x616px

>>85175785
Chris Evans is a ginger nonce. FACT

>>85176677
It's gonna be great when the frenchies and the gerries shut the Britbongs out in cold. How will they pay all the frauds at the BBC then?

>>85179046
do you news websites?

>>85179197
what?

>>85178137
Fire everyone bar shearer

>the guy on casualty gets paid 400k a year
>doctor who gets less than half that

what the fuck

>>85179197
Headline story on the guardian, the mail, the telegraph, the sun and the times

>>85178683
>preacher
>Catholic

you can't even get your references straight before you get offended lol

>>85178192
He will bring all those English shekels back to Bandon

>>85175877
impossible.

problematic

>>85176133
Reddit: the post

>>85176391
do like the idea of a cap on public sector pay

File: 1499072179376.jpg (51KB, 480x647px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 480x647px

>>85178464
> Doctor who wearing a fedora as his pic related
>Uses ad hominem
>Thinks the gender pay gap lie is a 'moderate' issue.
>Defends incompetent state bodies.
I can't tell whether anon is trying to be bait, based or is just actually a plebbit refugee.
>State of /tv/

File: Alex_Jones_2.gif (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>85177327

>>85178137
surprised theres no david dimbleby, ian hislop, lee mack, michael portillo or dara o'briain

>>85179687
Lee Mack and Dara O'Brien do a lot for other channels so they're probably paid less for not being exclusive talent.

>>85175877
Ummm it's 2017. Women are funny. Get over it.

BBC should be privatised anyway since It is supposed to be impartial and yet constantly spouts socially liberal garbage.

>>85178683
>Wow, a joke against the Catholic church. We got an expert on comedy here folks. Fuck you.
what a fuckin pussy

>>85178053
The Night Manager and Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell were good.

>>85178683

>Wow, a joke against the Catholic church. We got an expert on comedy here folks. Fuck you.

It wans't a joke you fucking retard. It is just a analogy meant to point out the hypocrisy of the BBC. Also, why are making a connection to the fucking catholic church? As I understand it, all christian denominations have preachers and people who serve similar roles. Maybe your catholic ass needs to recognize the reformation. It is okay to admit defeat after a coupe of centuries has passed.

>>85179876
>Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell

That' was fucking great. Perfect example of how to adapt a big book in the right way.

>>85179687
I think all of those shows are produced through production companies

Hence why Cucumbersnatch isn't on there

File: The Coronation of Napoleon by Jacques-Louis David.jpg (4MB, 2200x1375px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2200x1375px

The BBC would be perfect if it was literally just stripped down completely to BBC4, BBC Parliament, Radio 3 and Radio 4 - perhaps also with a thoroughly reformed BBC News (although cleaning up that den of vipers is an unenviable task). That would then be truest to the original founding charter of the institution. They went to shit the minute they decided that being the most popular/watched broadcaster was a part of their remit (hint: it's not).

>>85179917
Yes, actually I feel like "good" was underrating them. Both of those series are some of the best TV I have ever seen.

File: 174909118-4f88b3a1-95d2-4bb0-81b5-e2e0b3fc8ceb.jpg (132KB, 885x560px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 885x560px

>>85178053
line of duty. it's actually the only good thing the bbc has ever produced
excluding life on mars

>>85180193
Produced by World Productions

Haven't the BBC always been honest and up-front about the exact earnings of each of their employees (or at least they've been doing this for some years now)?

Isn't the obvious answer that women working for the BBC aren't getting the top jobs like Graham Norton's chatshow? I've no idea what Lineker does but I expect he presents sport events and such.

If it's such a problem, get women sports people in as hosts. Also I'm pretty sure Clare Balding gets a nice, fat paycheck. Isn't she all over the sporting stuff, even when it's not about horses?

>>85175919
Too bad they only chose shit majors

There is no gender pay gap, they all have different or multiple jobs. They can't be compared.

Dan Walker even said he gets paid the same as the women who present breakfast news, but he also presents Football Focus which gives him a seperate wage. So he's on the list but his copresenters aren't.

I think the worst ones are the radio hosts, literally 200 grand to talk for a couple of hours and have your producer do everything else.

>>85180398
>Isn't the obvious answer that women working for the BBC aren't getting the top jobs like Graham Norton's chatshow?
That's exactly what's going on. After adjusting for occupation and skill levels, the only (marginal) gap is in some of the top earners because women are shit at negotiating salaries. It's basically upper class cunts using gullible "progressive" women as their useful idiots.

>complaining about the gender gap
>not the fucking wealth gap

>>85179768
(Citations/examples needed)

>>85179906
>Not a Catholic
Pleb

>>85176629

but much toxic masculinity, male fantasy, male gaze and even if women want he-man it's because they're brainwashed by da patriarchy

Hire women who aren't completely replaceable and pay them commensurate wages.

>>85180492
>>85180493
Yeah, so if the BBC is open about who they pay which amount of money, then if they want to get more female names higher on that list they need to train some of their veteran female workers to do a higher-paying job. I bet Daly and Winkleman get loads for presenting Strictly. Get some more women in, give them a high-ranking job they can handle and the public will like. It's not sexism, it's just that those three men in OP's post have a long career behind them and now host top-tier BBC shows.

>>85175898
The newspapers are privately owned. They hate the BBC because it's paid for with tax money. Then again, the BBC makes incredible nature documentaries and has a duty to be fair and balanced, whereas the newspapers will lie and cheat and steal as hard as they possibly can to make money for their revoltingly wealthy and powerful owners.

As Stewart Lee points out, this puts the British public in the strange position of believing that the BBC is biased because the BBC reports on the allegations against itself.

When female personalities can pull in the pleb viewers like the top-rated men, they'll get paid accordingly. Culture takes time to catch up with the changing moral landscape. Who gives a shit

Literally millions of funny, interesting, attractive, entertaining women to chose from

Literally 5 funny blokes to chose from

Who do you think will be paid more?

>>85181165
If you think the BBC's coverage today has been remotely 'fair and balanced' you need to have your head examined. You can literally hear the spin machine whirring at full speed 300 miles away.
>>85177034
>>85176103
>>85176085

File: 1460407478694.png (538KB, 619x338px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 619x338px

>>85175785

So, the guys who bring in the most viewers get paid the most? What a weird concept...

Its like jlaw bitching about the paygap in hollywood, not realizing that dicaprio, brad pitt, tom cruise, kevin hart and rdj all bring people to the theaters (and alot of women too)

File: Wanda BLACKED.png (937KB, 1001x596px) Image search: [Google]

937KB, 1001x596px

>>85178552
>you can receive the BBC

The BBC will push to move to a German-style model of a mandatory TV tax for every adult citizen in the next 10 years as license fees continue to decline but salaries and production costs continue to inflate.

>>85181256
I agree that the BBC should never be judged on it's ratings. The reason these overpaid twats exist is because people think the BBC needs to compete in terms of popularity, when what it really ought to do is documentaries and news and high-minded dramas and kids shows and fuck the ratings yo, it's all about quality.

That being said, wasn't Jonathan Ross on like £8m? How much was that piece of shit on Top Gear getting when they finally fired him? This is a step in the right direction.

Furthermore you are a cuck

>>85181482
awful isn't it?

>>85175877
>>85175879
But Evans is neither funny nor entertaining.

>>85175947
He's great on Just A Minute.

Is this per episode, per week or what?

>>85181091

Daly gets 350k and only does Strictly so of the 500k Claudia gets we can assume 350k of that is for strictly. That's more than all 3 male judges got.