>there are "humans" on this board that think Tarantino

File: 1484970100623.jpg (110KB, 588x602px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 588x602px

>People who say ''Film is supposed to be entertainment!''
>People who have 2001, Seven Samurai, Citizen Kane, other pleb shit on their top lists
>People who have seen 1 film made before the 50s and think they have taste
>People who like Wes Anderson and think they somehow have taste
>People with most movies on list made in last 20 years
>People who have no foreign language movies listed
>People who think korean cinema is good
>People who have movies from Nolan, Tarantino, Aronofsky, Kubrick, Refn, Snyder on their list
>People who have any comic book movie listed
>People who say comfy/based

File: 1487199374972.jpg (208KB, 1440x1816px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1440x1816px

>there are "humans" on this board that think Citizen Kane is Orson Welles' best movie
>there are "humans" on this board that don't realize that the television directors of today's focus on plot and dialogue over the communication of emotion and narrative through images is literally destroying cinema
>there are "humans" on this board that think that Damien Chazelle is anything more than a television-tier hack who steals ideas from much better sources and is only praised at all because he's slightly better than your run of the mill indie film school graduate
>there are "humans" on this board that still take the word of internet shill "critics" who profligate the latest and greatest big budget comic book schlock in a console wars mudslinging contest when their cinematic experience amounts to today's television movies and 80s action and horror
>there are "humans" on this board that reject the dramatic use of color, dramatic angling, lighting and varied levels of focus in preference to the slick 80s "everything is flat, everything is focused, everything's lit like a stage play" commercialism style
>there are "humans" on this board that think that James Cameron is anything other than the human quarter pounder of filmmaking
>there are "humans" on this board that haven't seen a Wong Kar Wai film
>there are "humans" on this board that haven't seen a Samuel Fuller film
>there are "humans" on this board that think "Style over substance" is a valid criticism in an aesthetic medium
>there are "humans" on this board that don't recognize Steven Spielberg as one of the great prolific American filmmakers
>there are "humans" on this board that think that Kubrick was the be-all and end-all of "great filmmakers"

If someone can't appreciate warkino / Christkino like Hacksaw Ridge there is no reason to pretend they're human.

>"people" don't appreciate Spielberg
Who, exactly?

>>85175173
>Bertolucci
>he thinks continental directors aren't as pretentious and artistically delusional as thoroughly as Inarritu
Korean cinema from the last 20 years is better than french cinema from the last 20 years

>>85175303
Korean cinema is only ever okay, never better than good, and mostly shit. Especially that hack Joon-Ho Bong.

File: If you disagree you're an absolute trashcan and are literally the reason mainstream filmmaking is dead.png (102KB, 2020x1452px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 2020x1452px

>there are "humans” on this board that think that Zack Snyder doesn't have an iconic visual style that stands head and shoulders above his peers
>there are "humans” on this board that think that a comic book franchise with hundreds of different adaptations and interpretations can only restrict itself to one expectation
>there are "humans” on this board that go into a foaming rage whenever a movie subverts or goes against their expectations
>there are "humans” on this board that don't find the irony in Marvel movies supposedly being the "light-hearted comic" movies between the two using a dry and "realistic" visual style that doesn't fit the tone of the movies whatsoever
>there are "humans” on this board that don't find the irony in calling DC's superhero movies the "dark, overly-serious and non-comic" sect of the two when DC alone has a visual aesthetic reminiscent of and using iconic comic shots in a bombastic exaggerated style fitting the tone of those movies
>there are "humans” on this board that think that Gaspar Noe isn't a shock hack whose only claims to any fame are ludicrous drawn-out violence and sex scenes lacking depth and sensuality
>there are "humans” on this board that think that Harmony Korine isn't one of the most destructive of all the independent filmmakers because of his absolute rejection of trying to attain an interesting or pleasant aesthetic and instead fixating on filth, squalor and inane vulgarity without saying anything about it
>there are "humans” on this board that won't admit that Neveldine-Taylor are two of the most kinetic and explosively inventive action filmmakers of the 21st century and that it's a shame they don't get more work
>there are "humans” on this board that think that Martin Scorsese has made a single good movie in the 21st century
>there are "humans” on this board that don't recognize De Palma and Spielberg as the best of the ratpack

File: wonder woman.jpg (346KB, 2048x1280px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 2048x1280px

>there are "humans" on this board who don't worship /ourjewess/ and the movie that single handedly saved cinema in 2017

>>85175829
>worst DC movie so far
>saved cinema

Be real anon
The only reason it got a free pass was because muh female superhero lead though popular culture seems to sweep elektra and catwoman under the rug