>Sooooo it's an anti-banana ray >Does it work on all

>>85087234
Haha well quipped Seth Macfuckface King of the Redditors.

>>85087489
Jokes? In a comedy show? INCONCEIVABLE!

>>85087234
>Does it work on all fruits
>Cuts to gay character

Still better than Discovery

When does this come out?

File: Discovery-vs-Orville-2-1.jpg (627KB, 1200x1071px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 1200x1071px

>>85087888
It's pretty embarrassing when the Star Trek parody looks more like Star Trek than the canon series

>>85088015
>top one looks futuristic
>bottom one looks like my dentist office
how is that a good thing?

>>85087234
THAT WENT SOUTH SO FAST

>>85088094
>I dont watch star trek

Why bother even replying?

File: enterprise bridge.jpg (839KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

839KB, 1440x1080px

>>85088094
>Star Trek (2009) is the only Star Trek material I've ever seen
Oh it shows

>>85088182
>>85088213
I have seen all of them and my point still stands.
It's 2017, they should look as futuristic as possible since they are IN THE FUTURE.
The older shows had excuses for looking like a 60s cheap set, a whatever TNG was or a plastic set like Voyager

>>85088213
TNG might've been comfy as fuck but the OS was much more military/ industrial looking.

>>85087910
10th September, 8pm EST on Fox

>>85088094
>not liking classic Trek aesthetic

File: Interior_Columbus.jpg (2MB, 3032x2008px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3032x2008px

>>85088302
What tactical advantage does being in rooms that are somehow simultaneously both dimly lit and packed with brightly flashing lights provide in THE FUTURE?

>>85088015
Why does everything in the future have to have blue lights?

Fuck both shows.

>>85088302
>It's 2017, they should look as futuristic as possible since they are IN THE FUTURE.
>it's 2017

Literally not an argument to make the ships, uniforms, races and everything else look nothing like star trek

File: d50d3d10fc7b5590e73da646b81cf272.jpg (398KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1440x1080px

>>85088335
Eh

At least they also had the sense to not have you instantly blinded by lens flares if you look in the wrong direction

>>85088015
>that manspreading

File: writing.png (523KB, 1076x630px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 1076x630px

>TARGET ITS NECK

>>85088094

Aesthetic helps build the narrative.

BSG ruined scifi shows.

>>85087234
>*cakes on makeup*

>>85089021

BSG ruined stargate but Startrek ruined itself. Be fair.

>>85089110
i like my whores gussied up

Fuck this, I'll say it : I like Seth MacFarlane and I'm hyped for this show.

>>85090261
I like him as a singer and I liked Family Guy and American Dad when I was a teenager, I'm just hoping the show will be more 'adult' than that, the trailer looked promising though.

>>85090261
Tell me a single good joke in the trailers.

File: 1470493691488.jpg (99KB, 480x611px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 480x611px

>>85091178
Pic related. There's no point arguing this because comedy is subjective and you'll say you disagree.

>>85089021
>It's a Fedora episode
I thought you guys loved MacFarlane?

>>85091358
people have a scat fetish that does not make it good, stop hiding under the subjective label.

>>85091358
Adam Sandler is so funneh!
Can't call me dumb because it's totally subjective!

>>85091473
Then it's objectively funny and you're just wrong.

>>85091424
You don't have to be an edgy atheist to think Mormon faith is ridiculous.

>>85088495
The lights run the ship and it's functions, so having them stand out with dim lighting makes a lot of sense

Are we taking bets on whether or not Fox airs the episodes out of order and then cancels it after the first season?

>>85087234
I actually laughed during the trailer so I'll probably give it a watch.

>>85092020

This isn't going to be like the scifi cop show. Though to be honest they give mcfarlane a lot of rope. He has had several shows on fox for many years at any given time so he will be treated differently than the other shows.

Fox really wants to get in on genre craze and I think it will stick the landing.

>>85091653
But you do have to be an edgy atheist to spam about le mormons unprompted in every thread even tangentially related to BSG.

>>85092583
But it was you who brought religion up?

>>85092739
Because I recognised you as "that guy who spams about BSG being about mormons in sci-if threads", and you're a confirmed Fedrora.

>>85092864
All I said was "BSG ruined scifi shows", a reference to how STD seems closer in style to BSG than classic Trek.
You're the only who's obsessed with the religious aspects.

>>85088495

Real CIC on ships are like that, except without all of the bullshit blue lights.

>>85093034

Your entire statement is false. BSG didn't ruin Trek. Trek ruined Trek. Or rather JJverse did. You're making shit up.

>>85088302
>as futuristic as possible

We're in the future of the past right now, things look basically the same

File: Cylon-Base-Star-Bridge-battlestar-galactica-63335_500_360.jpg (38KB, 500x360px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x360px

>>85093089
Look at it, this isn't bright even tv lighting like TNG has.

File: 1491457_10152133751492236_1012449113_o[1].jpg (69KB, 843x474px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 843x474px

>>85093204
For those who haven't seen BSG, this guy is just a constant troll in BSG and related threads who I suspect was brought up mormon and got buggered by his priest, this is the bridge of the Galactica looks like, he's posting a Cylon ship, robots don't need bright lights.

Don't like Seth and to be honest, I didn't like the trailer but is anyone else impressed by how good the CGI looks for a network TV show? It's amazing

>>85088583
But it's not the sixties either, so track pants and turtleneck sweaters really could not pass as believable uniforms for star ship crew from the future anymore.

File: mpv-shot0057.jpg (157KB, 1280x528px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1280x528px

>>85093380
It's darker than the JJ Enterprise bridge.

What is this?
Is iit a real show?

>>85093541
That's because JJ is copying an Apple store, and Battlestar is making a realistic military sci-fi show.

>>85093613
I just realised the trailer hasn't been posted yet and we haven't even named it yet. The Orville, a real show, coming September:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy9sKeCE8V0

>>85093624
And does STD look like an Apple Store?
Or does it look a grindmark piece of shit, clearly trying to hard to be BSG?

>>85093624
>a realistic military sci-fi show.
kek

Seth McFarlane seems like a nice guy and would be cool to hang out with.
Can anyone confirm?

>>85095265
A smug shit-eating grin on his face while he makes anti-Christian jokes?

I guess if you're 15 and hang out on Reddit.

>>85095794
>anti-Christian jokes
Well are they funny?

>>85093703
The weird part is it feels like it's barely "comedy" at all

It looks like a pretty coherent Star Trek plot - a loser wannabe officer is given a commission over a small ship and a simple routine mission to deliver food to some scientists that's suddenly complicated by a bunch of murderous aliens there to steal the scientist's experiment - and then they just shoehorn in a few jokes by making the captain a sarcastic asshole

>>85095794
>2017
>being a christcuck
How bluepilled can you be?

>>85097638
When you consider the quality of TV comedy sci-fi so far; Lexx, Other Space, Farscape (barely), Firefly (even less so) it's the looking like it might be the best contender so far. Admittedly that's not saying much, but I'll be watching it.

>>85098440
Red Dwarf has actual jokes.

>>85098549
Naming a British show is basically cheating, *American TV comedy sci-fi* if you prefer.

File: stargate_sg-1.10x06.200.dvdrip_xvid-fov 00.20.39-00.21.29.webm (3MB, 624x352px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 624x352px

>>85098620
funnier than anything in Orville

>>85087234
I laffed, you're just too sad and bitter to enjoy light comedy.

>>85098927
I'm surprised there isn't a /pol/ edit of that first scene.

>>85088015
Why wouldn't you want your control deck to be well lit?

>>85088213
>TNG is the only Trek I've ever seen
Every bridge looks different each Trek tard and at least Discovery looks appropriate for a spaceship not like an early 90s corporate office.

>>85099198
Voyager and DS9 (at least the actual Federation tech) look mostly the same as TNG

>>85088015
>Orville has a viewing screen
>Discovery has a fucking glass/transparaluminium window

>>85099198
>looks appropriate
>helmsman take us to warp
>I can't see the fucking lever captain
Why would you want to be stuck in a dark dreary cabin sorrounded by pitch black space with neon lights burning into your eyes for years at a time?

>>85090261
People like to shit in him but at least he tries to write jokes instead of "finding humor" in mundane daily life shiy and dick and fart jokes Unlike Adam Sandler, Louis CK, Bill Burr, Seth Rogan and just about every other TV/film comedian

>>85095794
Did he hurt your fee fees faggot?

>>85099551
Go away, Seth.
You suck.

>>85087687
What joke?

>>85093703
This looks dull ad lacks creativity.

>>85098927
Fuck man SG had the best sense of humor. The Farscape parody is 10/10

>>85095794
>muh blasphemy
>people shouldn't be allowed to criticise my religion

Plz fuck off to Pakistan if you want that shit

>>85100311
She gets shot instantly, mate.
Watch more than the thumbnail.

>>85100380
I watched until it was clear they were defending their pet nigger from a coalburner, justify why either should live.

>>85100574
The "white" chick is an alien, so not part of the white race.

>>85100679
Oh, and the black guy is an alien too.

>all this talk about how inaccurate Discovery looks

I thought it was a prequel to JJ Star Trek and not the original shows. Then that would explain why everything looks so futurey.

>>85100800
Just stop making fucking prequel series.
We already had ENT.
No one wants to see that shit.

I just want a post ds9/voy/movies series
is that too much to ask for?

>>85101111
post voy/movies

should retcon all the dumb shit in voyager and the movies (especially Nemesis)

File: 1479847755096.jpg (63KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1200x630px

>>85087842

File: CG_53.jpg (614KB, 2100x1500px) Image search: [Google]

614KB, 2100x1500px

>>85088495
>a research and observation station is the equivalent of a warship/exploratory vessel

>>85088015
I like top better.

>>85101249
I find this picture to be quite cool

File: Untitled.png (186KB, 492x514px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 492x514px

>>85101249
IVE GOT A BOGEY

File: 62892881.jpg (28KB, 318x324px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 318x324px

>>85101429
You sure? Looks like a boogie to me dude.

>A ship with holes everywhere
>a klingon design worse than the one we had 10 years ago
>dark bridge with same looking uniforms with thin gold silver and bronce elements and tiny rank insignia so that you can't make out who is who
>Mass Effect look
>Fucking lensflares
Everything in this new show looks like garbage with style over function everywhere.

File: NASA.jpg (2MB, 3072x2040px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3072x2040px

>>85093541
>>85093380
This is what a command station looks like IRL, fyi.

>>85101586
the orville looks amazing

>>85087687
>joke

File: Seth-MacFarlane.jpg (342KB, 1104x1864px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 1104x1864px

>>85093703
>mints?
>marbles

What age range is this intended for...?

>>85093703
Is that country music?

>>85101749
Older than you

>>85101939
Other than Bang a Gong by T. Rex, I think the music is all original

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVEhDrJzM8E

Deep Space 9 is the best Star Trek.

File: 1470989330974.webm (330KB, 300x236px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 300x236px

>>85087687

>>85088015
we all know that not star trek people has taken over the new show and it well not feel or look like star trek. It well be all SJW (which has gone full crazy town cult )and blue lights

>>85101249
Those lights are not that bright. The exposure was just long on the camera. Hence the ghosting of the people moving.

>>85102046
I'm actually the same age as Seth.

>>85103708
Snap. And in that case you should recognise psychical comedy when you see it, even if it hasn't been popular since the 90s.

File: image.jpg (27KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 413x395px

>>85087489
Holy shit

>>85103601
I hate when Star Trek has diversity.

>>85088015
I thought the same thing comparing The Kingsman with Skyfall

File: cic.png (734KB, 1177x668px) Image search: [Google]

734KB, 1177x668px

>>85101249
>all navies use legacy analog radar displays that require dim lights to be visible.

File: b8aef7dc4f01113063b9fff75b844cc4.jpg (97KB, 991x751px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 991x751px

>>85093204
>Star Trek never had anything but super bright bridges

>>85106298
Nice TNG screenshot bro, you sure proved him wrong.

File: mpv-shot0059.jpg (45KB, 576x432px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 576x432px

>>85106298
Voyager is shit.
But does have a bright bridge.

File: kurisuuu.png (128KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 300x300px

Literally a stein's gate ripoff

>>85098927
what's this from?

File: kirkbridge.png (875KB, 1266x551px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 1266x551px

>>85106359
You said BSG ruined Trek. I provided an example of a pre-BSG Trek with somthing beyond a super bright bridge. Want another one

File: 1492799271716.jpg (793KB, 1920x3240px) Image search: [Google]

793KB, 1920x3240px

>>85106528
>You said BSG ruined Trek
I think you've gotten confused at some point, Battlestar Galactica is my #1 show of all time, my only posts in that chain other than the one you responded to is >>85093380.

>>85106528
>movies are lit differently than tv shows
amazing

File: 1481724798473.jpg (23KB, 620x348px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 620x348px

>>85087687
where is the joke?

>>85088213
the aesthetics of like every TNG interior shot are just on point.

I even like the shiny blankets...

>>85088213
love TNG set, we need a new TNG with mila kunis as Deanna Troi!

>>85093703
Pity it's set in the future, Scott Grimes could have played a washed up Brad Brown taking a job as a helmsman who is secretly searching the galaxy for his lost friend Charlie.

>>85088702
whats with the weird lens flare or whatever that is in that shot?

>>85093541
this bridge looks like a disco, why the hell does the floor light up? what kind of function could that serve?

>>85106298
this looks dark to me, and again why does the floor have lights? this is gay.