How long until this massive piece of shit becomes two or possibly

Probably never, it's why they're making that Fantastic Beasts stuff instead. The plot synopsis I've read of those stageplays sound absolutely terrible. Literally every major character is somehow a relative of the characters from the books.

>>85083970
It's worse than you think.
>Entire plot is timetravel and basically Back to the Future: Harry Potter.
>In the BAD END universe, there's literally a day called "Voldemort Day".
>Cedric Diggory became a Death Eater because his feelings got hurt.
Pure cancer-kino almost

akio bum

File: ICQ.jpg (15KB, 387x272px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 387x272px

Come on guys, let's give it a chance before we judge.

>>85085191
What did Draco mean by this

Saw the play and it was fucking shit only had some good practical effects but the story was just rehashed fan fiction which made no sense and theyre fucking with the time turners. Diverse actors were pointless and added nothing.

I want to see the trolley lady become some fucking retarded monster. I'm pretty hype. 2021 release date.

>>85085607
Hog warts is pretty prestigious so it would attract many people of the former british empire right?

>>85085701
They made hermione black.

File: 1453656323224 (1).jpg (1MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1588x2862px

Whether it's 1 2 3 4 5 6 7, the director of these movies definitely won't go to heaven as part of the dullest franchises in history. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>85083895
You'll probably get a "based on the CC" film. I can guarantee they'll make something about Harry and Draco's kids being lonely outcasts at Hogwarts together sometime.

>>85085927
The only good part of the play was the start
>Harry's son doesn't get sucked off for being amazing every two seconds
>Everyone hates him
Good writing
Then...
>LMAO TIME TRAVEL TIMMY TURNER