BLADE RUNNER 2049 NEW TRAILER https://www.youtube.com/watch

I still don't know what to make of this.

>>85077173
KINO!

>>85077304
It's going to be virtually stunning and hopefully a KINO

prometheus 2.0 incoming

i feel like while some scenes try to imitate the blade runner look and feel others just look like generic indoor/outdoor settings. in the orginal the worls felt very consistent in its colors and light, here the colors and light is all over the place.

>>85077173
it's not going to be /kino/, just another blockbuster filled with action scenes to satisfy normies, it's 2017 for fucks sake

>>85077445
Yeah. It's really lost its atmosphere. Feels like a generic sci-fi flick.

>>85077542
>blockbuster
It's gonna bomb, but it's gonna be KINO.

>>85077173

At least the soundtrack is good. One of the best bits of the original was the score.

But I swear to fucking God if Deckard is a replicant I'll murder someone.

>>85077173
>you dont know the meaning of pain
>you will learn
CRAAAWLING IN MUH SKIN
>robin wright and that nigger from walking cucks
LMAO no.

>Denis Villenueve

It's going to have a plebby or twist ending that's for sure.

File: 1493018372301.jpg (116KB, 490x490px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 490x490px

>>85077173
I've never seen a trailer that misses the point of the original so god damn much.

Looks about as 'good' as Ghost in the Shell. When does hollywood get nuked?

>>85077173
Better than the last one

File: 636072470420119945-57103349_denis villeneuve.jpg (480KB, 2060x1236px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 2060x1236px

Should we put hopes in this man?

>>85077542
You know how /tv/ is always wrong? Because of posts like these

File: o-ZACK-SNYDER-facebook.jpg (306KB, 2000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 2000x1000px

>>85077767
no we should put our hopes on this man

>>85077173
Fucks sake, if you wanted to make a generic futuristic action movie why not just fucking do so? Why shit all over an existing property in the process?

>>85077767
It's these two you have to worry about

File: Screen-shot-2011-04-13-at-1.42.51-PM.png (48KB, 489x201px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 489x201px

>>85077907
Oops forgot pic

>>85077724
>misses the point of the original so god damn much
>deckard: "we were being hunted"
>"we"
>the point of the original
I think you're a Nexus 7, which is a Replicant without a brain.

File: 1500295133461[1].jpg (10KB, 299x340px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 299x340px

>seamless CGI
>great props
>AMAZING CINEMATOGRAPHY
>Dave bautista
>Ana de armas
>goose
>Great soundtrack

This is everything Ghost in the Shell hoped it would be.

KINO IS BACK ON THE FUCKING MENU BOYS

>>85077567
>generic
ghost in the shell looks shit compared to this, the worldbuilding/atmosphere in that was a terrible attempt at this

Gaius Baltar FTW

>>85077956
hating on based warner brothers

>>85077767
yea, he doesn't make bad movies.
but this definitely has the potential to be his first failure.

File: 68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f7279496d6167652f7132677654385755506c696271673d3d2d3333323531343535302e313438356439303562616663633131333438303532393636383130392e6a7067.jpg (124KB, 1280x1237px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1280x1237px

>Jared Leto

>>85078185
The only based studio is Disney


The rest of them make nothing but garbage and need to be shut down as soon as possible

>>85078129
This, looks kino as fuck.

>That synth soundtrack

File: 1399231718196.jpg (82KB, 700x714px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 700x714px

>>85077173
This looks like smeared shit.
Shit color grading and absolute, ABSOLUTE TRASH lighting by an amateur who has no idea how to create mood, because all he has ever worked for was on cgi capeshit.

It does look better than that Ghost in the Shell atrocity, but only slightly.

>>85077173
The generic zimmerian soundtrack kills this.

>>85078129
This same post is in another thread.
It keeps happening what the fuck.

Looks like fucking shit.

>>85078415
Have we reached peak Disney shilling yet?
It feels like we have.

>>85078582
>ABSOLUTE TRASH lighting by an amateur who has no idea how to create mood, because all he has ever worked for was on cgi capeshit.

Lol.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEO62wE21sM

>>85078690

It's by the same guy that did this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0ahB25FJ6o

I don't know why they used such shit awful music for the trailer. But there's no way it will be anything like that.

Looks o but it's an action movie now which is a little dissapointing

>>85077586
The soundtrack will be good. Johan Johansson is doing it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KJVaNosoCg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TbAvlYa8rI

>>85077173
This actually looks pretty good but having it be a sequel instead of just happening in the same universe and having Harrison Ford reprise his role is... stupid.
Also
>unironically hiring a rassler

File: 14478923049933.gif (725KB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

725KB, 200x150px

>>85078927
I can't wait for the next one, hope it's as good as Sicario, pure fucking kino

File: blade.....runner.jpg (120KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1600x1600px

That was a hell of a lot better than the last trailer. The teaser trailer is still the best though.

>>85077173
K I N O

>>85079081
I doubt it. Villeneuve is a master of tension and none of his movies have a focus on action.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cEBguJj3dg

>>85078058
>Nexus 7
It's a fucking tablet, anon.

>>85079314
yeah i've seen his previous movies but that's the vibe I get from this trailer
its' just lacking that noir vibe

>>85078582

>shitting on Roger Deakins

this board is the biggest fucking joke there is

>>85079384
That's because it's a trailer and it "has" to be retarded to stupid execs. He probably has nothing to do with the trailers at all. I don't believe for a second the type of music in the trailer is the type of music that will be anywhere in the movie. It's just not Johans style.

I think at worst, 2049 will be okay to fine. I'd be impressed if it was bad

>>85079455
What if it's kino and better than the original?
I know it's far fetched, but it'd blow my fucking mind

>>85079455
There's no excuse. It is possible to make a slow-paced trailer that does noir and not explosive music.

>>85079573
You have to get the normies interested too to sell tickets. The original Blade Runner also did what 2049 is doing. Show all the action in the trailers trickery.

>>85079573

No one is saying it isn't possible. But they don't make one like that because the marketing people don't want that.

File: 1495754579935.jpg (84KB, 1024x692px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1024x692px

>>85079573
It's a shitty excuse that makes no sense but its what marketing teams think the people want to see so they keep doing it. Even video game trailers are doing it now.

DUN DUN DUN DUN IN A WORLD DUN DUN BASS DROP EXPLOSION. WE'RE RUNNING OUT OF TIME DUN DUN DUN DUN I'M COMING WITH YOU! DUN DUN DUN BASS DROP GUNSHOTS THIS ISNT THE END DUN DUN TITLE CARD

The trailer looks good but I still have this slight apprehension that the plot is going to be dumb and/or generic. Maybe I am getting too cynical, but I do still plan on seeing this in theaters.

>>85077173
>it looks like an action movie
bravo Ridler

File: 1495756764981.jpg (28KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 640x480px

>>85079521

That would blow my mind too. It would put Villeneuve on the map for real and not just for critics. I'd be really happy for him. I think his style of directing is great for cinema in general.

>>85079698
Nah you are right to think that way.
Recent work of the director isn't putting any faith in the movie,I mean i will sell tickets but will be bland as fuck.

>>85079613
>>85079649
>>85079669
Again, not true. Normies are okay with slow paced trailers, just look at all the rom coms and other 2deep4u movies that are loved by normies. You don't need action to sell a movie.

File: deus ex was right again.png (197KB, 1235x486px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1235x486px

Seems to "big". One of the best parts of Blade Runner was how small the story actually was even with major events happening (I mean, Tyrell was assassinated, that's a huge world event) it never felt like it went too high over the characters head.

It is something that I've noticed in a lot of modern films, and I'm not sure what to call it.

File: 046.jpg (30KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 600x600px

>>85079774
Do you have no fucking reading comprehension whatsoever? Nobody is saying normies arent okay with it. Everyone is saying marketers think it's all normies want.

Jesus.

>>85079573
Or just limit the budget and make the money back on a dedicated audience.

I'm hoping they put all the action in the trailer so that they don't give away any of the interesting story beats.

I'm retarded though, they've just made another fucking action film.

>>85079143
looks like an old john wick on the bottom one

>>85079774
Learn to read.

File: 1496466656249.gif (408KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 250x250px

>>85079878
>villenueve
>action film

The music sounds like Daft Punk's Tron score.

File: 1475037427161.jpg (647KB, 2696x2232px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 2696x2232px

>you don't know what pain is

>>85079903
>>85079846
Marketers and execs tailor it all to the normies.

File: mpv-shot0006.jpg (42KB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 854x480px

WHERE IZZY?

>>85077586
I'll bet $5 that the only replicant is Gosling

I get such a huge "we wuz slaves n shiiiiet" vibe from this movie.
I bet you it will be all about the rebellion of muh poor replicants against the ebil whyte man.

>>85080063
Does that look like they're about to have some rough sex or have I been watching too many lesbian porn films?

>you will live long enough to see Blade Runner ruined by Holykikes

jfdimsa ffs

>>85080077
Batista is also a replicant. It's actually from the unused intro to the original where Deckard casually walks into a giant replicant's house and retires him.

>>85080077
He's not a replicant he's a goose

File: happened again.jpg (23KB, 244x248px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 244x248px

>>85080109
>"I like [movie] except for..."

Are you guys seriously considering revival of the whole Deckard was a replicant meme?

This director, Denis Villeneuve, is not good enough for a movie like Blade Runner. Very disappointed.

>>85080099
Shut the fuck up you moron.

File: blade-runner-2049-mackenzie-davis.png (902KB, 1440x594px) Image search: [Google]

902KB, 1440x594px

>>85077173
Good points

A it has Villeneuve,
B Roger Deakins.
C Good special effects
D Dave bautista, Ana de armas, Makenzie Davis
E Good soundtrack

The only thing that worries me is Harrison Ford,

>>85080314
t. DeShawn Washington

>>85080266
That's cool that you've seen the movie so you can accurately make that assertion.
Tell us about it. Does Goose die? Is Deckard a replicant? Is it an action adventure or a Noir drama?

>>85080420

TORILLA TAVATAAN

>>85080420
Harrison Ford only worries you because of the kind of movie this is going to be.

If it was like the original you'd be intrigued to have him there.

>>85077173
>you're a cop
>no.
>I'm a blade runner
>BRRRAAHHHHHHM
>BRRRAAHHHHHHM
>BRRRAAHHHHHHM

jesus fucking christ ridley

>>85080140
Seems that they mined a lot more from the novel that was untouched by the first movie.

>>85080476
No Harrison ford worries me since he been phoning in roles for at least 10 years now.

>>85080266
This movie was co written by Michael Green.
>Green was born to a Jewish family[1] and grew up in Mamaroneck, New York.
>Green's feature credits include Green Lantern.
>He has written or co-written four films released or set to be released in 2017, James Mangold's Logan, Ridley Scott's Alien: Covenant, Denis Villeneuve's Blade Runner 2049, and Kenneth Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Green_(writer)
>>85080426
I have seen enough from this guy to know I have little faith in his ability.

File: Ridley_Scott.jpg (9KB, 200x225px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 200x225px

How is he gonna sabotage this one?

PART TIME

File: 1500086091883.png (89KB, 883x990px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 883x990px

I don't know why people keep acting like the original was flawless. It was visually stunning, aesthetics and setting were amazing, and Rutger Hauer stole the show with the best performance of his career, but many other things were pretty weak.

Here's the story:

- Deckard is a replicant
- Goose is a replicant
- Deckard has lived alone for awhile
- He ventures to a different city (Las Vegas) where Deckard decides to drop tonnes of goo on the inhabitants, exterminating them all
- Goose comes to investigate
- They meet each other and kiss
- Decard is killed eventually but Goose survives
-Twist ending: it wasn't Goose, it was actually Deckard, who is now captaining the ship

>>85080730
this
But you aren't allowed to say that because /tv/ decreed that it's zomg da bezt movie evar

>>85080730
We're not saying it's flawless. We're saying that this isn't Blade Runner.

Also, why is this movie pretending Deckard was important in any way? They dragged him in off the street for a job, then dumped him right back there when he was done.

>>85080140

That scene more or less confirms a few things:

>Scott is going with the Deckard = Replicant thing.
>Batista is a Replicant (who dies during this scene).
>Gosling is a Replicant.

These three confirmations come about as a result of establishing the bar for action in the movie. It's an incredibly important thing as it informs the viewer what the MC can and cannot do, and can/cannot withstand during a fight or some act of physical trauma. Gosling literally getting put through a wall like that by a guy like Batista tells us that the MC is not normal, right off the bat. This, coupled with his methodical nature and skill also shows he is not normal in other aspects. Now, the alternative here could be that Gosling /is/ actually a human, and Batista & Deckard are Replicants. However we're being led to believe that Deckard isn't a Replicant, and that Gosling is throughout the movie. This would be an interest role reversal as the Replicants were designed to pass as human (this is the whole reason for the test), and exceed human thresholds in pretty much every other avenue. If Gosling turns out to be human and Deckard is a Replicant, than what we have here is a situation where it shows that humanity can be cold, and robotic (autistic) and that a Replicant is no less capable of being confused for a human by the viewer. We know this already given it's the fucking underlying story of the original film, but it does help bash the concept in over the head of normies who still can't grasp it.

>>85080627
In some parralel universe, he is the one who jumped off a bridge...

>>85077409
>>85077577
>>85077769
>>85078129
>>85078492
>>85079521
why don't you get a tripcode so I can filter you you fucking shills
at least try to imitate human behaviour a bit so you can pretend to fit in, this is just sad

>>85080420

How fucking sad is it that Dave Batista being in your movie is a good thing now, but Harrison Ford being in it might actually tank the whole fucking production.

I think they'll intentionally leave the ending ambigious as to whether Deckard is or isn't a replicant
>>85080758
B R A V O

File: gfdgfd.png (9KB, 622x176px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 622x176px

>>85080857
>le shill Dx
You got me

>>85080623
This guy went from writing Green Lantern to writing Blade Runner. It's a fucking joke.

>Villeneuve

So another superficial dumb movie tricking viewers into thinking it is/they are smart?

>>85080857

Yeah, dude, we need some kinda test to filter out the bots from us REAL people. Some kinda... Voight-Kampff test.

>>85077173
only white people. It's confirmed trash.
When will studio executives finally learn!

>Morgan Freeman cameo
>Felicity Jones cameo

kino

>>85080911
Where in my post did I ever imply samefagging? I said "shills" plural
This is what I mean when I say that you could at least try to imitate human behaviour

>shitty meaningless "deep" trailer dialogue
>tryhard Gosling wondering around with his shitty male model sad eyes
>Leto being le wacky and "futuristic" in a kimino
>explosion
>flying car chase
>dude member robot crying?
>dude member robot bursting through wall?
>dude member robot in rain?
>dude member synth soundtrack?
>dude member all those wacky outfits?

No one thinks it's completely retarded to take striking and original shit like the soundtrack, world design and outfits and just pay shameless "homage" to them with imitation? How the fuck is paying respect to originality imitation?

>>85080943

Why do people hate Villeneuve so much? I realize he isn't an auteur but the man is probably one of the best working directors around. Is it because he tends to like directing stories that come off as pretentious? I've got no issue with the man at all. And the fact that he isn't a meddlesome wretch like Scott is a good thing.

>>85080623
>I have seen enough from this guy to know I have little faith in his ability.
why do you say this

>>85080998
>some people in a fucking Blade Runner thread are cautiously optimistic for the new Blade Runner movie
WE HAVE TO STORM WB's STUDIOS BECAUSE CLEARLY, UNLESS EVERYONE IS SHITTING ON THE MOVIE, THEY HAVE SHILLS ON OUR BOARD!!!

>>85081014
Nobody gives a shit retard,as long as it makes money.

>>85080857
yes we are totally real because people aren't allowed to agree on things on a fucking film and television board yeah im totally a shill :^)

>>85077445
It's over, Deakins is finished.

>>85080936
I wonder (((why))) he was able to make such a leap in his career...

I trust Villeneuve to make movies I really like. I trust Harrison Ford to be a washed up actor who drags down everything he's in. I trust Goose to pick good roles regardless of how well he does in them. I trust Ana to give me a boner.

>>85081046
>as long as it makes money.
maybe thats all you care about you fucking shill but we want a good movie

>>85080797
>We're saying that this isn't Blade Runner.

And this is a bad thing? Why even make a sequel if the goal is just to be exactly the same as the original?
Yes it does not look as dirty and "grimy", but it's clear that they were not going for it. Do you want a yet another TFA situation?

>>85081025
It's Sicario, which was a simple story, but viewers tend to think it's deep and serious.

It's Arrival, which made absolutely no sense, but people think it's innovative and smart.

>>85081072
*goes for thumbs up*
Wait, we're not on Youtube?

>>85077173
Where's the AESTHETIC?

File: kino.png (384KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 1280x800px

>>85081161
its gonna be KINOGRAPHIC

>>85081025
Most anons here hate the people who enjoy his movies more than the movies themselves.

>>85081096
You are literally too dense to understand that money is the only thing it matters.
The movie will be fucking garbage and everyone is agreeing with this.
Doesnt matter,I will go and pay for a ticket and so many other people will too.
I wont be surprised if they make a followup soon after.
Muh legacy means nothing.

>>85081109
>And this is a bad thing?
It is when it's called "Blade Runner."

Was the original even a good movie? Soundtrack and the sets were great, yeah.

>>85081140
>arrival made no sense
It does and it's not even particularly clever either

>>85081186
Mr Deckart I am Blade Runner

>>85081267
This lmao

>>85081140
>It's Sicario, which was a simple story, but viewers tend to think it's deep and serious
And? The story doesn’t have to be "le deep" for a movie to be good. Talk about the movie not the viewers

>It's Arrival, which made absolutely no sense, but people think it's innovative and smart.
What did not make sense? Again, talk about the movie, not the viewers

>>85081039
>>85081057
it's the usage of memes that makes it obvious, those posts don't sound like they're written by a human being, they just mashed together a handful of /tv/ memes together in an attempt to sound like they belong
KINO IS BACK ON THE FUCKING MENU BOYS!!!! is the stuff I'm talking about, there are a bunch of other people itt who are optimistic about the movie which I haven't pointed out because they don't sound like bots who just copy paste the same exact stuff over and over, your replies are also the same as the ones that are posted every single time a marketer is outed so it's not really helping your case

>>85081140

The story of Sicario is simple, but the politics behind it was not. He does a very good job of downplaying and hiding nearly every important aspect of the politics in the film that drives the action until the end, or you go back and watch it. This is a deliberate choice in order to mirror the confusion of the otherwise intelligent MC. She is confused, but she isn't confused because she lacks information that we have been told deliberately while she isn't around. She lacks that information because she isn't told it, or it's told around her in such a way that it's useless to her or us until the end. Even when we're directly told something it's usually duplicitous because she (and us) are being misled.

Arrival was innovative because the aliens and first contact scenario was a huge departure in every way from the usual affair regarding these two topics. People liked that it was refreshing and different, and also focused on the humans without getting bogged down in, "DUDE WEIRD AYYY'S LMAO!" or "DUDE EXPLOSIONS LMAO!"

>>85077173
>>85077437
>>85077542
>>85080063


this will gonnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa be shit

>>85081312
They are bots you dense fuck,Hiro is trying to fake traffic numbers.

>>85081312
>KINO IS BACK ON THE FUCKING MENU BOYS!
I always assume some retards post this ironically.

>>85081312
No, tell us. Are we or are we not allowed to be somewhat excited for a movie? Or is your paranoia just too much to grasp that?
Trumptards like you need to be shot

>>85081312
>KINO IS BACK ON THE FUCKING MENU BOYS!!!!
on /tv/ it's pretty common to say this

>>85081335
i no enlish good

>>85077173
>Non stop hyping of a Justice League trailer on the coat tails of Wonder Woman the last week
>Get a Bladerunner trailer out of nowhere

I honestly didn't expect them to drop another trailer so soon

File: oooo.png (325KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 1280x800px

>>85081312
Ana de armas makes it wankino fuck you

>>85081423
Its coming out in September isnt it?

>>85077173
kino.

File: 0973b53ab11fca2c7361a5d934ac721e.png (684KB, 1279x639px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 1279x639px

lexi?

>>85081340
Yeah well it could be that or human beings just being bad at it since some companies are too tech incompetent to use bots, I worked in a bunch and they just had worker bees typing out code because they couldn't figure out how to use bots even for that
>>85081359
>>85081410
yeah I could be losing my grip on reality due to too many levels of irony where real memes are made to sound fake and forced on porpouse
>>85081376
the post you replied to is esplicitly about how it doesen't have anything to do with liking the movie

>we were hunted
Madman Ridley did it? Deckard is canonically a replicant?

>>85077173
>w-we are making a philosophical sci-fi film! t-this is not an action movie at all!

>>85081450
Yeah, was expecting it mid august at the earliest

>>85081450
First week on October

>>85081545
>>85081566
Well its not too soon to push out a new trailer.
That said I wont see the third one because it will reveal the whole story.

>>85079817
Good observation, it's probably something to do with the increased emphasis our society has on the importance of the individual or some shit.

Really starting to get tired of modern movies and their shitty lighting.

IF YOU THINK THIS MOVIE HAS A CHANCE AT BEING GOOD, YOU'RE A SHILL!
IF YOU USE MEMES IN THIS THREAD, YOU ARE A SHILL!

I didn't like it. There's too much daylight scenes.

>>85081645
Thats because most of it is faked in post production.

>>85079433
Roger Deakins has nothing to do with lighting a movie, you subhuman Redditor retard.
>>85078927
That was the only decent looking shot in the entire movie and it was made with natural light. Any dumbfuck could have done it, even an assbirth like you. Again, this has nothing to do with lighting a movie.

You Redditor fagglets show your endless ignorance.

>>85081744
I know. It still annoys me though.

>>85080879
>Hating Based Batista
Fuck outta here mate, dude has been more successful than The Rock lately and is genuinely a chill guy

>>85080967
Thats Lennie James, not Morgan Freeman. He plays Morgan on TWD ala the only good actor on the show

>"IT'S SHIT, IT DOESN’T LOOK AT ALL LIKE THE ORIGINAL, THE ORIGINAL WAS NOT ABOUT THAT, IT'S SHIT"
>"IT'S SHIT, IT LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE THE ORIGINAL AND THE SCRIPT IS BLATANTLY THE SAME, IT'S SHIT"

Make up your mind you goddamn autists.

File: v1[1].jpg (17KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x300px

I feel like 90% of this thread have not even watched the trailer and are already shitting on it

>>85081831

That's not what I am saying, it's fucking sad that Dave Batista (a pro wrestler) is actually a good actor and is good for your movie, but an actor like Ford with decades of experience as a leading man could very well tank the film.

>>85081865
>>85081884
Shills

>>85081884
That's because, as it's been established, if you have any hope for this movie, you're a shill. SO you have to shit on it

>>85079143
Thinking of hanging this on my wall

>>85081884
>>85081932
see what I mean here? >>85081907

>>85081932
Shill

>>85081773
angry brainlet

File: BR.jpg (161KB, 3464x1722px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 3464x1722px

Pro-tip: You're gonna wanna peruse Hampton Fancher's original script for the first film as well as Dick's DADoES? to get a read on where this is headed.

>the scene with Bautista is the first scene in Fancher's original script, with K now taking the place of Deckard
>Deckard's remark we were being hunted may allude to the parallel police department in DADoES?
that was staffed entirely by Replicants, who had also erected a parallel society whose depth and extent were not entirely known, but suspected to possibly already have grown larger than human society. In the novel, Deckard had been arrested by the Replicant police and barely escaped with his life
>i kind of wonder if Leto's character's glaucoma aren't filters for that replicant redeye

That's why I'm so pumped. It looks like Villaneuve is fleshing out details from the novel and original script which were unaddressed in the first film and are absolutely necessary for any sequel to be worth the name, although determining whether Rachel had reproductive capacity, whether Deckard did too (if he's a Replicant, as he likely is), and whether they had a kid ought to be considered necessary topics as well.

This is gonna be fucking great. I don't like Villaneuve at all, actually. Tired, trite, and derivative, with just one good film (Prisoners) under his belt. But with the source material and production guidance he has, I think he's gonna pull it off.

And any of you who are already judging it to be shit are fucking Millenial scum who weren't even alive when the first was released. Watch all five versions and read the novel, its sequels, and Hampton's script before opening your fucking mouths again, you stupid, ugly children.

>>85081977
Shill

File: 535575-director-denis-villeneuve-on-the-set.jpg (1MB, 1500x1065px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x1065px

>>85081744
There are already a lot of B-rolls and on set shots of BR 2049 and the vast majority of the shots in the trailets are actual practical set pieces and lightning.

>>85081932
>having hope for this capeshit trash
You were never a fan of Blade Runner to begin with.

>>85082013
based shill

>>85082041
>everything I don't like is capeshit
Whatever you say, senpai

>>85082040
thank you. this is what i mean by people not watching the trailer and shitting on it

>>85081645
did you even fucking watch it

>>85077173

SPOILERS

The future of the species is Women as shown in the trailer.

We see people walking next to old statues of men.

Later we see the main character at 1:01 looking in a deserted/ruined area revealing statues of women.

The past that has been forgotten is that Women were the focal point and now it's them who are the future.

>>85082040
>the vast majority of the shots in the trailets are actual practical set pieces and lightning.

And they're just as shit as the post-production lighting.

>>85080487
That wasn't in the novel. That was in Fancher's original script.

>>85082041
>You were never a fan of Blade Runner to begin with.
no u

see here >>85082013

Everything about this is complete garbage

I guess this is what low iq individuals such as yourselves like though

>>85082041
>you are not le TRUE fan argument
You decided that you will hate this movie before you even saw anything about it and there's nothing to change there, you're already lost.

File: 46mEV.gif (468KB, 500x232px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 500x232px

>>85082013
>>85082040
>>85082087
>>85082091
>>85082148
>>85082155

>>85080833
That and we've already seen K run through a wall unassisted in Trailer #1.

>>85082106
>>85082149
close minded plebs

>>85077173
Came to the thread to see someone dumping Ana de armas pics but man, I was dissapointed.

File: You Amuse Me.jpg (68KB, 640x460px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x460px

>>85082181
That made me laugh. fuck you

>>85082104
I don't know which shitty plot is worse
this movie's or some random internet assburger's

>>85082181
what has this got to do with /pol/ im seeing pol posters spring up in my other threads right at this time aswell

is this when the BASED PEDES wake up?

lmao

File: rich bladerunner.jpg (951KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

951KB, 1920x1080px

>>85077173

>>85077304
It's a Ridley Scott movie directed by a poor man's Christopher Nolan, starring Harrison Ford and an autistic goose.

>>85081264
boom

how can anyone defend this

>>85082480
Please explain the similarities between Nolan's and Villeneuve's work.
And talk about their work, not their audience.

>>85082579
Both make superficial popcorn movies that pretend to be deep so that the viewer doesn't feel guilty about watching mindless entertainment. They both use 19 shots when 5 would do.

Also, le epic Zimmer music.

>>85082560
explain whats so bad about it? looks better than any trailers for upcoming movies this year desu

>>85082660
>They both use 19 shots when 5 would do.
sure they do

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cEBguJj3dg

>>85082715
>cherry picking one example from a sea of millions

GTFO Jewish beta fag

>>85081773

> the DP/Op doesn't light movies

You are retarded

>>85082802
>sea of millions
kek
imma cherry pick this :^)

>>85082381
If Rich Evans was the main character I would watch the movie.

looks good af but I miss the noir theme of the original

>>85077173
>watching something that gives away like 80% of hte plot before the final act

that's fine with shitty flicks like marvel movies but if it's a movie that you might actually really enjoy like this, why do it?

something about it seems soulless

>>85082660
>Both make superficial popcorn movies that pretend to be deep so that the viewer doesn't feel guilty about watching mindless entertainment
You're talking about the audience, your argument is like thinking that Fight Club is a bad movie just because some autists think it's has the meaning of life itself in it. Talk about their work

>They both use 19 shots when 5 would do.
Please post a single clip from any Villeneuve film that has too many shots/cuts in a scene. I'll wait.

>Also, le epic Zimmer music.
Don't get this point, Villeneuve works mainly with Johannsson and every single soundtrack of his is mostly atmospheric long synth notes, I don't see a single similarity with Zimmer

>outrun the truth

Everyone is androids, Harrison Ford is the last human.

>>85077173
mercerism confirmed boyos. kino to surpass evangelion inbound!

>>85077445
its not so much the mere look, there was a certain focal length and relationship to the framing. I feel like theres more or less a constant between scales of how characters appear on screen

>>85082982
Look at this fucking pleb.

imdb movie of the year!
just add that superhero name on your titles already villememe because the pretension is starting to get a little annoying

First off. I saw this last night at a special showing, and I'm not lying, probably 50 or more percent of the people in the theatre were seniors. Me and my girlfriend are 23 and we had an old couple in front of us and on both sides of us and it smelled like old people.

Second off, people were checking their phones 70 minutes in. It was distracting. The old man sitting beside me fell asleep and I knew when he fell asleep because his breathing changed from quiet to slow and heavy and the old lady in front kept turning around to see who was making so much noise.

Third off, when the movie ended, only 1 group of nerdy highschoolers awkwardly clapped. I felt so embarrassed for them, myself, and everyone around me. They started off clapping so confidently, like they thought they could get everyone else to clap too. Then the old lady on the other side of me was about to start clapping but when she saw no one else was joining along with them she changed her mind. Everyone left the theatre in dead silence.

>>85082922
it's actually continuing the novel(do androids dream of electric sleep) sub-plot of collectivism of human mind, spirit, and emotion. It's called mercerism in the novel. Forgot how it ended though.

>>85083113
Nice argument kiddo.

>>85081643
certianly feels like there is a latency to knowing when to step aside

>>85083157
key evidence being the main antagonist(forgot his name) sharing the grey soul-less eyes that Deckard's novel-only wife(iran) has, who is an indulger in the collectivist-religion of mercerism. Androids naturally do not like mercerism as they'd like to be independent as much as the "regular" humans do.

>>85083157
I'm down for a more sci fi story but I do love what scott did with the book in the original blade runner

maybe its time for a reread since I don't see any of the empathy boxes in this new movie

>>85077173
looks like they kind of meme movie that's been taylor made for reddit

>>85083347
Did reddit liked Prometheus or that new Alien whatever it was?
If they did this is really made for them lol

>>85083243
Yeah novel was about expressing human individuality whose key was emotion/empathy. mercerism didn't play a huge role, but I see they're taking that sub-plot to an appropriate cult-leader villain in this movie. I'm wary but also satisfied they're not continuing the emotion plot-line as I feel like it's had a good ending. Now comes the second part where the threat of individuality, an aspect desired by androids and humanity like, is threatened by collectivism. dunno if you've watched evangelion, but this guy wants to "tang" everyone judging off the trailer dialogue.

>>85083369
yeah, they did.

>>85083243
oh yeah I didn't see the empathy boxes. they're definitely changing it, but I think scott might be using replicants as the new empathy box.

File: 5.png (2MB, 1920x808px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x808px

>>85083510
>yeah, they did.
this kills the /tv/ patrician
prepare for 24/7 KINO spam

>>85077173
Wow this will be lucky to make $100 million worldwide lol. Who is this crap for.

>>85082013
knowing ridley scott he will base nothing off the book

>>85083660
He's just the executive producer, the writer is the original Blade Runner writer and Villeneuve is directing.

>>85083243
Re: book, I firmly recommend Greg Johnson's entertaining essay
https://www.counter-currents.com/2014/04/philip-k-dicks-do-androids-dream-of-electric-sheep-as-anti-semiticchristian-gnostic-allegory/

File: 1498585101905.jpg (92KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 612x612px

>>85077173
>rain scene
dropped

>>85077173
This is gonna be pure KINO lads. Budget Lexi Belle is starting to grow on me as well

>>85083592
Just like the original film, it's gonna bomb and nobody will get it. Then after 20 years it will be regarded as true kino and everybody will suck it's ever loving teet

File: 1445896374201.gif (869KB, 400x265px) Image search: [Google]

869KB, 400x265px

>>85077173
god I hate minimalism so much
why the fuck scenery looks so empty and uninspired?
>muh less is more
it's simplistic and dull
the passion from the original film is gone.

>>85083908
wtf is Kino? what does it mean?

>>85083986
get out

>>85081140
Sicario is a simple story, just told well and has serious balls with the switch in narrative 2/3rds of the way in.

Also, Arrival is a simple story, just told well and breaks the usual mold of that type of story.

To be fair, Prisoners is a simple story told well.

I fully expect the new blade runner film not go too deep (will still have the question of what is it to be human.) but I expect it to be done well.

Hell, it a good match as the original blade runner isn't that deep of a story, just became a classic due to the set design and the main bad guy being so damn good.

File: dri.jpg (16KB, 267x274px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 267x274px

Ok /tv/, I have never seen the original blade runner 1982 so should I?

>>85084042
Yes its called The Final Cut.
Also people will drown you with Dekart was a replicant meme but thats another story just ignore and enjoy the movie.

>>85077173
Should I watch the other 2048 movies before seeing this one?

File: snapshot.jpg (348KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 1920x1080px

Who thinks this is what the world looks like 4 decades from now?
Its like one of those comically off cartoons from the 50's where people predict how people commute with flying cars in the year 2000.

>>85084119
fucking retard

File: 124312343.gif (1MB, 245x300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 245x300px

This is a warning people
get down from the hype culture.

All you're going to do is to disappoint yourself.

>>85084119
Put wheels and something to hide the wings in a helicopter and you will have a flying car.

Why are Batista's glasses so comically small?

File: 170424_TECH_Musk-InsaneIdeas.jpg.CROP.promovar-mediumlarge.jpg (24KB, 590x421px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 590x421px

>>85084119
>no sun
>sun panels

How can they FK UP so bad. Its like Hollywood refuses to acknowledge anything its done in the past with upmost contempt.

>>85081886
Well Dave Batista actually tries to act, apparently goes to acting classes on a regular basis to keep learning, and shows up on set on time knowing his lines.

Harrison ford shows up on time and knows his lines, but the last movie he tried acting in was in Bushes first term, and one could argue it was back in the late clinton years.

>>85084119
It's the Blade Runner world, not the representation of our world in four decades you turboautist.

>>85080420
Harrison Ford will be good desu. He's turned down the chance to do a Blade Runner sequel for decades now because he always thought the script was shite.

>>85082013

Yep, I was wondering if they are going with the secret society of replicants plot idea from the novel. Also him seeing the bug on his hand might be that they focus more on the concept of everything is nearly dead on earth and perhaps we might see stuff about squatting braindamaged humans

>>85084245
I seem to recall California existing in the real world, but its not based on real world now? Its a different planet orbiring a different sun but they just happened to name a place california and use the christian calender to date time. Did a jesus doppleganger exist in the "blade runner" world?

File: 1496530799875.jpg (59KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 720x960px

Another oppressors and oppressed shit/

>>85082802
get btfo,
Its cherrypicking!

>every civilization was built on the back of a disposable workforce
Really makes you think.

>>85083144
nice LARP

>>85084411
And the oppressed are all blacks and minorities, of course.

>>85077173
Why is the music so shit its completely to loud

File: Batista-With-WWE-Championship-Belt.jpg (212KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1440x900px

>based big dave
KINO

>>85084110
Just watch the first 300 the others are spin-offs.I don't even know why they named them Blade Runner, they had the perfect trihundrelogy.

>>85083949
No, in 20 years, no one will remember Ryan Gosling or 2049. Maybe Leto will be remembered. The future won't be kind to movies. This release as zero connection for people under 40. Which is a shame, because PKD's themes of Pharma unrealities, any kid can get that. I have hopes for the PKD anthology series with Cranston, unless they SJW tf out of it

>>85084042

it is utterly boring as fuck, but it looks nice and probably should watch it before this new one

>>85080077
no he's a real human being

>>85084314
yeah he's definitely not after one more paycheck for his family before he dies

>>85081886
Batista will be in the movie for all of 2 minutes anyway. He's not playing anyone important.

He's the tractor driver in the opening scene which has been detailed in an interview already.

File: 1472840927082.jpg (152KB, 440x457px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 440x457px

>>85077173
I went from cautious optimism at the first teaser to total disgust at every trailer since.

Sort of unrelated, but why doesn't Hollywood make a sci-fi based on the technology we're using, researching and prototyping today instead of the usual "lolflying cars" and "robots will takover humanity!!" shite?

Something that helps visualizing what the world could REALLY look like in 100-150 years and maybe make it more optimistic than the usual gloom and doom

>>85085455
because same people are in charge for CG for the past 30 years.
They lack perspective and fresh ideas yet they are in charge.

>>85084314
plus he hates riddley scott and his ideas

File: DE8kxSxWsAAGjGG.jpg (78KB, 1024x640px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1024x640px

so why is it called blade runner

File: 1304613261377.gif (127KB, 280x347px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 280x347px

>>85080936

I tried to watch Blade Runner so many times but I keep getting bored. Its incredibly slow paced and dull as fuck. Not like I have a short attention span, I've watched other slow paced sci fi like Avatar and Passengers and liked them.

Blade Runner is just shit.

>>85085953
Hi Jay

File: maxresdefault.jpg (119KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1280x720px

>>85077173

>villeuve
>roger deakins
>goose
>ana

the worst part of this movie will be ford. mark my words. if they just killed him off the movie would be 10/10 KINOGOAT.

>>85085995
Who? Sorry I don't keep up with /tv/s autistic obessions.

>>85085953
>slow paced sci fi like Avatar and Passengers
Not sure if Troll or retarded

>>85086148
Maybe slow paced was the wrong word, what I meant is a thinking mans sci fi film over dumb popcorn flick scifi like Transformers.

>>85077173
>>85077173
It looks good but it seems they tried to take elements from the sequels to 'Do Androids Dream of Electric of Sheep' with some new things.
It will no doubt be shit then.

>>85086208
I didn't like blade runner the first time I saw it, but fell in love with it the 2nd time.

Think of Scifi movies as movies with 4 settings for "Thinking."

1 - Movies that do not require much thinking. 5th element is a good example of it.
2. Movies that have some concepts that require thought (I will use Avatar for that)
3. Movies that are trying to convey some key concepts, but also tell a story - Bladerunner and the Animated GitS are good examples
4. Full bore autistm - 2001, Solaris, and the like.

Once I knew that blade runner was really a detective story of a detective that doesn't do much detective work and accepted it for what it is, it really is a good film.

Some are freaking out as the preview has so much action (even if we may very well have seen all the action sequences in the preview).

Considering what the director did with Arrival, and his other work, I suspect that much like arrival, Prisoners, and Sicario, this will be the 4-5th best movie of the year that I will like a lot.

>>85086620
>4. Full bore autistm - 2001, Solaris, and the like.
GET THE FUCK OUT YOU FUCKING IDIOT

>>85077173
Blade runkino 2047

I don't mind the trailers because I know for certain Villenueve will deliver a great film.

Should I wait for this or watch the original

>>85077173
Looks promising but i have a couple of remarks
-lack of vibrant neon atmosphere
-fear that Ford's character will have too little screen time
-fear that Leto's villain (?) will fall flat

The film automatically carries a heavy burden, I don't expect it to entirely live up to the masterpiece that is Blade Runner.
I just hope they don't squander the film's legacy.

>I had your job once, I used to be the Blade Runnner 2049

Shut it off right there

>>85087473
>fear that Ford's character will have too little screen time
Fear? I sincerely HOPE his character dies in the first 15 minutes, harrison is an old demented bafoon

>>85087016
Good, that triggered you :^)

File: Hole Guy 2049.jpg (20KB, 130x178px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 130x178px

>>85077173

>you can't outrun the truth

I swear our rulers are going to come out and say some Humans are really Replicants. It could be easier to make one of them, than a machine like a Terminator. Just hijacking nature.

it stinks.

I haven't seen the original yet. Which cut should I watch?

>>85087808
SUCK MY DICK NIGGER GET THE FUCK OUT YOU FUCKING PLEB

>>85088242
Final Cut

File: 16809545_1628113547203856_332737012_n.jpg (43KB, 500x566px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x566px

>>85082982
Great points anon, especially about the audience.

>>85083113
Sure smells like summer in here

>>85088450
Thanks.

>>85082883
This

File: rach.jpg (548KB, 1000x997px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1000x997px

CGI Sean Young pls

>>85088729
>Just put the real sean young in the film
>have ford say "I was able to get her more life, but at what cost?
>Goose retires both

File: ineedthedeck.jpg (102KB, 800x823px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 800x823px

>>85089035
>He's seen things you wouldn't believe

>>85080952
Undercucked post

File: elcantante.jpg (19KB, 250x358px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 250x358px

>>85077173
>mfw Star Wars nerds won't understand this movie!

>>85081773
Do people actually think the DP doesn't light movies? There is no way people who have more than a laymans understanding of film production think that right? This has to be bait.

File: rTerf6T9LfYkw.gif (1MB, 372x288px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 372x288px

>>85086620
>2001
>Solaris
>the like
>boring autism
okay then anon name some more kino that you're too retarded to enjoy

>>85084370
Cinema Autismo

>>85087473
>lack of vibrant neon atmosphere
original BR was predominantly dark and navy blue. there were glimmers of color but this was used to contrast the murky, gloomy setting. the longest scenes were usually not bright and colorful
>fear that Ford's character will have too little screen time
I don't think Ford's lack of presence would be an issue because he's clearly not intended to be the focus of the film. he's gonna be someone that goose meets up with, then probably killed off before a third of the movie is up. old geezer probably only came back for the check since so many people didn't like Blade Runner at first
>fear that Leto's villain (?) will fall flat
my fear when I saw the first trailer although if he's the calm, calculating, psychologically threatening villain I'd be okay with that. if he were just the brains behind everything and spewed a bunch of culty philosophical shit about why what he's doing is best I'd be okay so long as he doesn't show a lot of emotion because that's when a villain like that really breaks down

honestly I love Blade Runner and I hope this is good kino, don't know why people are already shitting on this with a good to great cast and production (Villeneuve, Scott, Deakins, Ford, Gosling, cautiously including Leto)

>>85085953
>other slow paced sci fi like Avatar and Passengers

>turning Blade running into an action-packed Blockbuster
>Turning Deckard into a replicant.

SOMEBODY KILL RIDLEY SCOTT

>>85077437
>prometheus 2.0 incoming
villeneuve said he signed on to direct because the script was really good. now I realize that villeneuve is a facebook/reddit director who built his career by making dumb normies feel smart but with all that in mind, villeneuve would have still wiped his hairy french-canadian ass with prometheus' shooting script while laughing hysterically.

>>85077577
>It's gonna bomb
the original bombed as well so that'd be like some kind of pottery right there. rhyming pottery even.

>>85087016

At least his right with 2001

>>85091406
Cant argue with that.

They need to stop trying to sell this like is an action movie.

i'm kinda hyped tbqh

WHat about the wall?

>>85091607
Its being built.

>>85077173
>A FUCKING TREE

>>85091539
they want to make money. or cut their losses, to be more realistic.

looks decent, im stoked for brotista though

>>85081595
Yeah I'm kinda bummed I even watched this one, it reveals way too much of the plot, like every fucking trailer these days. I'm so sick of this bullshit. Trailers are supposed to make you want to see the movie to find out what happens, not show you a condensed version of the entire plot so you already know what happens.

I just fucking hate the time we live in. For so many reasons. Take me back to the 80 and 90s please.

looks like ass.

>>85092353
thicc?

>>85077306
CONTRIAN!

>>85084119
You fucking idiot blade runner 1982 played 2019

Woha what a fake autistic movie. I don't see any flying cars and like anything in the movie, do you? Where are muh sex replicants. What were they thinking right?

File: 1472792841426.png (585KB, 569x802px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 569x802px

The movie isn't going to be about Deckard for very long. The trailers make it seem like it, obviously, to draw people in that like Harrison Ford. But Deckard was just a semi-retired Blade Runner who was slipping into alcoholism and obscurity. He had no real leverage for this "war" they keep mentioning.

That is, until he met Rachael. She's obviously the big thing everyone is after, not Deckard. But Sean Young is bat shit crazy now so they will explain that she died and is buried somewhere and after they get that information out of Deckard, they'll get rid of him. The scenes we see of Harrison Ford in the trailers are going to be about the extent of his time in the movie. K looks for him until about 2/3rds in, finds him, asks about Rachael, finds out she's dead, they get captured, they get free, shoot out in club, Deckard dies, movie slides into final act.

I bet that K isn't even out to find Deckard at first, he's out to find Rachael until he discovers that she ran off with this Blade Runner so he tracks him down instead to learn more.

The big focus of this movie is Rachael. I don't think they will make Deckard a replicant because of this. She's the "key" that Jared Leto is talking about, not Harrison Ford.

That last shot of the fucking trailer.

Mark my god damn words. That was a young replicant Deckard in the shadows that Deckard and K are looking at. We are going to get CGI Harrison Ford and we are going to find out Deckard is AND isn't a replicant so that everyone will be happy.

You'll see.

>>85077173
>robin wright

Eugh, dropped