How bad is this going to age?
The CGI is already aging like milk
In 10 years when the CGI is worse than video games, will it be remembered as shit or as a pulp sci-fi classic?
The romance ruins it in all honesty. TPM and ROTS will be fondly remembered after reddit realizes the sequel trilogy are glib facsimiles, but AOTC's only redeeming parts are Obi-Wans quasi neo-noir dectective work.
>>84987468
pleabs and red letter fags will say this. Patrians will see it as a hallmark for how movies would be made. Almost every CG-I hevey live action film is done by IBM, the same people who did the Star Wars computer effects.
>>84987651
I think you mean ILM.
bump
>>84988670
>soldiers literally trained from birth wouldn't have thought to use their masive battery of lasers to shoot the ships down
thank goodness yoda was there with his high wisdom stat to suggest this strategy.
>>84988822
They're designed to be obedient and dumb genetically so yeah
>>84987468
The movies are terrible not because of the CGI. They're bad because of how terrible Hayden Christensen and Natalie Portman are at acting, which is many of the reasons why TPM is the best out of the three prequels. The CGI isn't as bad as people say it is and I think still holds up relatively speaking.
>>84987468
This and all the prequels were a masterclass in terrible filmmaking
I don't care how bad it ages but Portman tummy will be eternal