>tfw you like Lynch as a person but think Kubrick makes better

theres no debate. Lynch relies on gimmicks the same as Anderson and Tarantino. He is that level.

>>84985275
>gimmicks
like what?

>>84985298
>dude dreams lmao

File: thejester.jpg (29KB, 753x707px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 753x707px

>>84985331
are you being serious

>>84985275
id argue that tarantino is a level below even wes anderson. tarantino is a hack

>>84985187
Kubrick is great, but he's no Robert Altman

>>84985419
Robert Altman is great, but he's no Jodoroski

>>84985187
>>84985275
>>84985419
>>84985444

None of them are on the level of Hitchcock, Huston, or John Ford.

I Lynch left wing or right wing? I've heard he's been on Alex Jones and is into conspiracy theory stuff so I assume he's probably like a Libertarian or something.

>>84985569

He supported Bernie.

>>84985593
disgusting

>>84985593
citation needed

>>84985569
Ooo need to know this as it will decide whether I like his movies or not

>>84985539
Hitchcock, Huston and John Ford are great, but they're no Lynch

File: 1485453383583.png (66KB, 510x332px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 510x332px

>>84985187

>>84985539
Are we gonna just keep on going back in time until we hit griffith

>>84985832
what?

>>84985838

>griffith

He's no Edwin S. Porter, you know.

>>84985865
I am shocked by this statement.....Ok Kubrick had an IQ of 200 but that doesn't necessarily mean he makes better films.

>>84985635

https://twitter.com/DAVID_LYNCH/status/714871987043078144

>>84985865
He was probably shocked at how someone could post something so incredibly wrong. Kubrick is, dare I say it, a hack.

>>84985976
better than hillary I guess

>>84985838

Griffith is a poor man's Méliès

>>84985976
Yeah that's our guy