Why is this disliked? Is it because it's not optimistic

/tv/ hates it cause there are POCs in it

>>84982520
Thought it was pretty good

I watched it once a decade ago and thought it was great. I didn't understand why it got shat on for winning the Oscar. I'm sure if I watched it now I'd hate it.

>>84982520
No, it's because it's too PC and optimistic, with a pat conclusion and TV-style meaningless cross-cutting.

It was so pretentious that I had to stop watching after a few minutes

>>84983219
>POC

leave

>>84982520
It's a pretty good movie. Not amazing, but good. A perfect example of a movie getting an unnecessary amount of hate for over an arbitrary award

>>84982520
I don't even remember Don Cheadle on it. Who did he play?

I remember the enslaved chinks, the racist cop and the rookie, the black thieves, the bitch unleashed and the director, the politician and the racist wife, the muslim store owners and the mexican worker.

>>84982520
Who doesn't like It? The fags on /tv/ that don't like anything? What a fucking surprisem

File: CRASH-v2-Silver-Ferox-Design.jpg (198KB, 683x1011px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 683x1011px

>>84982520
>The better Crash
>dicks out

>>84982520
>dude everyone's a racist lmao

>>84985848
web 2.0 hivemind seems to hate it, I think this anon got it right >>84985585

Personally, I'm not a fan of interweaving stories in movies. It's watchable, not bad or good. I still think it was better than Munich, Capote, Brokeback Mountain and Good Night and Good Luck. A History of Violence was way better than all of them.

>>84985956
I like Cronenberg, but that movie was awful. Good fap material, tho.

File: crash_1996.jpg (54KB, 560x405px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 560x405px

>>84986182