>there are "humans" on this board that think Tarantino

bigguy4u

File: 18697962_1943160955957075_1670227005948757246_n.jpg (59KB, 540x446px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 540x446px

this is now a doggo thread

File: Genndy Tartakovsky.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>there are "humans" on this board that think Citizen Kane is Orson Welles' best movie
>there are "humans" on this board that don't realize that the television directors of today's focus on plot and dialogue over the communication of emotion and narrative through images is literally destroying cinema
>there are "humans" on this board that think that Damien Chazelle is anything more than a television-tier hack who steals ideas from much better sources and is only praised at all because he's slightly better than your run of the mill indie film school graduate
>there are "humans" on this board that still take the word of internet shill "critics" who profligate the latest and greatest big budget comic book schlock in a console wars mudslinging contest when their cinematic experience amounts to today's television movies and 80s action and horror
>there are "humans" on this board that reject the dramatic use of color, dramatic angling, lighting and varied levels of focus in preference to the slick 80s "everything is flat, everything is focused, everything's lit like a stage play" commercialism style
>there are "humans" on this board that think that James Cameron is anything other than the human quarter pounder of filmmaking
>there are "humans" on this board that haven't seen a Wong Kar Wai film
>there are "humans" on this board that haven't seen a Samuel Fuller film
>there are "humans" on this board that think "Style over substance" is a valid criticism in an aesthetic medium
>there are "humans" on this board that don't recognize Steven Spielberg as one of the great prolific American filmmakers
>there are "humans" on this board that think that Kubrick was the be-all and end-all of "great filmmakers"

now do one about zack snyder

File: 1375688440326 (2016_12_08 01_52_40 UTC).jpg (62KB, 392x500px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 392x500px

>>84926829
>>84926892

>there are "humans" on this board that think that Michael Bay isn't an auteur with an influential and iconic style that perfectly suited his masterpiece Pain and Gain, one of the best satires of the 21st century

what a fucking shit-for-brains you are! Pain and gain is indeed satiric somehow, but its unintentional. That faggot Bay had to make the criminals sympathetic and their real-life victim was turned into a crook on silver screen to make the movie more approachable to wide audience.

File: 1402617027297.jpg (33KB, 502x480px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 502x480px

>>84926924
>there are "humans on this board that think that Zack Snyder doesn't have an iconic visual style that stands head and shoulders above his peers
>there are "humans on this board that think that a comic book franchise with hundreds of different adaptations and interpretations can only restrict itself to one expectation
>there are "humans on this board that go into a foaming rage whenever a movie subverts or goes against their expectations
>there are "humans on this board that don't find the irony in Marvel movies supposedly being the "light-hearted comic" movies between the two using a dry and "realistic" visual style that doesn't fit the tone of the movies whatsoever
>there are "humans on this board that don't find the irony in calling DC's superhero movies the "dark, overly-serious and non-comic" sect of the two when DC alone has a visual aesthetic reminiscent of and using iconic comic shots in a bombastic exaggerated style fitting the tone of those movies
>there are "humans on this board that think that Gaspar Noe isn't a shock hack whose only claims to any fame are ludicrous drawn-out violence and sex scenes lacking depth and sensuality
>there are "humans on this board that think that Harmony Korine isn't one of the most destructive of all the independent filmmakers because of his absolute rejection of trying to attain an interesting or pleasant aesthetic and instead fixating on filth, squalor and inane vulgarity without saying anything about it
>there are "humans on this board that won't admit that Neveldine-Taylor are two of the most kinetic and explosively inventive action filmmakers of the 21st century and that it's a shame they don't get more work
>there are "humans on this board that honestly prefer Chaplin to Keaton
>there are "humans on this board that think that Martin Scorsese has made a single good movie in the 21st century
>there are "humans on this board that don't recognize De Palma and Steven Spielberg as the master auteurs of the ratpack

>>84927494
Hitchcock sucks.

>>84927494
Wow you forgot got slot of closing " on this one.

Confirmed pleb

lmao ur a faget

sage

>>84926829
Name one objectively bad movie Tarantino has made.

>>84928918
kill bill
reservoir dogs

File: 1498940501439.jpg (200KB, 764x512px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 764x512px

donne le croissant

File: 1497220095503.jpg (59KB, 500x735px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 500x735px

>>84926829
>there are "people" on this planet who type shit out like to this to make themselves feel better about their shitty lives

>>84929019
Fuck off retard

>>84926829
Fuck you and your black and white bullshit cinema.

>>84930882
t. dcuck nolan brainlet

>>84928918
Every movie he's made has been a shitty derivative of a better one (or more)