Books 3 > 2 = 6 > 4 = 7 > 1 > 5 Movies 3 = 6 >

Don't be a dullard.

They're all shit, what's your point?

Not going to slam your entire list, but holy shit anon, 6 anything but last for the movies. Awful taste.

inb4 the Q memes

>>84894879
lol u mad? get laid son

File: 1489592588835.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

I don't know how one can go about ranking the Harry Potter films, as all equally form one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>84894954

Adventures of Huck Finn is good

>>84894805
Books:
6 > 5 = 7 > 3 > 4 > 2 > 1

Films:
3 = 6 > 7.1 > 7.2 = 5 > 2 = 1 > 4

File: 1498811688647.jpg (3MB, 5760x4800px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5760x4800px

>>84894901
Half Blood Prince is pure kino.

>>84894879
It's just numalery scum here for GoT

How did Voldemort get his wand back after he died?

Movies: 3 > 6 > 7 pt 1 (The others doesn't exist)

I just read until 3, the best one... i leave the fourth in the middle. Should i continue?

Roberts = Stone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dogshit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Watson

File: harry_potter_and_the_sorcerers_stone_2001 boats to hogwarts.jpg (60KB, 700x468px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 700x468px

Can we all agree that 1 was comfy as fuck?

Watson>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>dogshit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> redditsamefagautists>>>>>>>>>>>Roberts>>>>>>>>>>>>>Stone

>>84894901
Pleb its one of the best easily

>>84895203
>>84894805
Good ranks lads

3>7>6>8>5>2EE>1EE>4


From most underratdd to most overrated
Deathly Hallows 1
Half Blood Prince
Order of the Phoenix
Chamber of Secrets
Prisoner of Azkaban
Deathly Hallows 2
Sorcerers Stone
Goblet of Fire

>>84897006
They all are, saying otherwise is wrong. Max comfy

>>84896505

Anyone > Emma Watson

This cunt is even worse than Margot Robbie and Jlaw combined.

>>84897291
No MGTOW, she's a breath of fresh air compared to those rats. Even moreso because she triggers this reddit board.