TONY STARK WAS ABLE TO BUILD THIS IN A CAVE..........WITH

Bases Kurt russel

>>84872344
>"I'm sorry, sir, but a fully functioning gas chamber is going to take some time."

Wtf Raimi

File: warma.jpg (36KB, 570x300px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 570x300px

>>84872344
next time baby

you now remember this film being a passion project for Jon Favreau. Glad it was released before Disney put a fat jew in charge as 'creative producer'

>GET ME IRON MAN

WTF did Raimi mean by this!?

>>84872344
I'm sorry but... I'm not a manlet!

>>84872367
>Waaah I want to be paid just as much as the main character

>>84872367
and he was never seen again

>>84872367
this still bothers me

File: HT_PP_zpsc471a689.png (771KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

771KB, 1024x576px

Can we talk about Pepper Potts (as a character)?

>>84872374

Disney hadn't even owned Marvel by this point. Disney's first Marvel production was The Avengers.

>>84872611
S T I C C

200m dollar school film

the absolute madman

>>84872374
MCU belonged to Paramount

>>84872611
moar

>>84872611
Well we certainly cant talk about asses so might as well.

>>84872367

Look, the dude really needed to just take time off to perfect Terryology.

It's probably going to change the way we conceive reality so I figure it was the right thing to do.

Remember, 1 x 1 = 2

File: iron-man-3-1-1.jpg (545KB, 1680x806px) Image search: [Google]

545KB, 1680x806px

>>84872611
Why did she want her extremis powers gone?

The ability to melt off someone's dick seems pretty hot desu

>>84872796
damn it, she's really flat

>>84872796
>just melted whole armie of robots
>her underwear still on

>>84872374
This wasn't a passion project. It's just as bland and generic as every other MCU film, and in a way it set the tone for the future releases.
Iron Man was the first MARVEL film that was part of Feige's Marvel Cinematic Universe. Feige and other producers were already working on the shared universe, and Marvel's Phase One, as early as Iron Man (2008). The fact that Favreau was hired to direct the first Marvel Studios film is irrelevant. They chose Favreau because he could be pushed around easily by the studio heads (all of Favreau's previously films had been studio pictures).
Also, Favreau, while competent as a director, lacks artistic vision making him the perfect guy to direct a MCU film. It's no coincidence that Marvel Studios hires such directors to direct their MCU films.
Disney buying Marvel Studios didn't change a thing since all the higher ups (producers/executive producers) of Marvel Studios remained the same.

If you want to see what a Marvel film with creativity and vision behind it looks like take a look at Raimi's Spider-Man, Ang Lee's Hulk or Singer's X-Men. Pretty much anything that isn't part of the MCU.

>>84873145
> It's no coincidence that Marvel Studios hires such directors to direct their MCU films.

except for the russo brothers, right?

>>84872796
moar

File: 3A5zT91.jpg (289KB, 1404x1024px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1404x1024px

>>84872716

>>84872918
This bothers me every time. I get that she didn't want to show her titties but couldn't they have shot it a different way? Her undies aren't even singed.

File: image.png (2MB, 2228x1133px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2228x1133px

>>84872344
You now remember Marvel shamelessly Ctrl+Cing Obediah Stane in Ant Man

File: PTfWLZmiA9vl.jpg (56KB, 594x396px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 594x396px

That's Peter Billingsley from Christmas Story on the left. You can tell they shaved the top of his head.

>>84872344
CAAAAAAAAAAAAYVE.......WITH A BOX OF SHCRAHPS