Was it just me, or was the CGI in this movie absolute shit? Spiderman

It looked like shit. Not sure if becuase of the incompetence of the developers or because of the design of the suit. Looks like it's supposed to be an old fashioned rubber looking piece of shit.

Apart from the suit the CGI was all right.

>>84811091
He looks too weightless. It makes the physics seem all wonky. He also seems to fall too quickly when he jumps, like he's getting sucked back down to the ground.

Enjoyed the movie, though.

A lot of the effects were bullshit. They couldn't even digitally remove Michael Keaton's lisp.

>>84811784

>They couldn't even digitally remove Michael Keaton's lisp

You're fucking stupid. If you don't like Michael Keaton's voice then you don't like Michael Keaton. I don't even want to know who you would have cast as it, keep it to yourself.

The shot from the trailer where he jumps backwards off the building towards the helicopter is laughably bad.

something something sony fault

Spider man stun double looks like a grown ass man and not a highschool kid.

>>84811091
>MCU has gotten lazy
more at 11
they dont even have to try to get billions

>>84811091
I think at least part of it comes from the CGI guys trying to emulate the way he's shown bouncing around in the comics, but once you apply real-world physics, it becomes way obvious that a guy who can jump around like Spidey would still be a sitting duck while airborne for anyone who's at least a half-decent marksman, Spidey-sense or not. To hide this from the viewers, they "cheat" and make his ballistic arcs abnormally fast.

>>84811091
Yes it was very shit despite the budget. That's what happens when you put a hack like Robert Downey Jr in your movie and are forced to give him 80% of the budget for him to act like himself with minimal effort.

>yfw he's being paid 200 million to be in the next avenger's film