I'm curious: Why do people often refer to mid 2000s shows

>>84648155
Millenials are hip. Everyone wants to be as close to millenials as possible.

>>84648155
>andre3k
Did anyone actually enjoy that show at all?

>>84648591
I did, it had great songs

>>84648155
Oh god, I'm 90% sure American Dragon tag teamed with Space Jam to turn me into a furfag.
Every day, I pray for the embrace of death.

>>84648950
Did Space jam turn you into a furfag because of Lola, or because of the scene where the bara alien's butt is exposed?

>>84649100
Rabbit tits.

>>84649127
See I also liked Lola as a kid and it never turned me into anything

I think you are just born with the furry retardation and it is only a matter of time when it awakens.

I think because "2000s" to many feels bigger than just ten years. By 2500, half of this century could be (correctly) be referred to as the "early 2000s."
t. Shitposter

>>84649182
This. There's that one part where they're about to play the aliens at the end and she looks really hot. Can't stand furryshit though.

>>84648155
If you're born in 1999, you're a late 00s kid.
And you're 18 years old today.
Holy shit.

>>84649352
Someone needs to do the actual math and we need to declare an actual cut off point.

>>84649352
I consider childhood ages 5-10 so that would make someone born in 1999 a 2004-2009 kid, or mid-late 2000s kid

>>84649182
Yeah all the boys were turned on by Lola. I remember my friends talking about her and none of us are furfags

I was born in 1991. Am I an early 00s kid? Or do I count as 90s?

>>84649519
>I consider childhood ages 5-10
What is the actual correct defined range of childhood?

>>84649418

It's generally accepted that memory really takes root around 4. So to be a "___" kid you have to be born in the first half of the decade if not the latter end of the previous. So 90s kids are probably 88-93

>>84649619
3-12

>>84649616
Both, your prime childhood was from 1996/7 to 2003

File: 1484627001930.png (19KB, 457x392px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 457x392px

Any objections?

>>84650594
Autistic but I like it

Someone try posting this on one of those Facebook/Twitter nostalgia groups and see if they like it or if they rage

>>84650818
Well if the goal is to bait facebook/twitter users let me edit it first.
Give me a second.

>>84650594
6-4 not being counted as half or at least partial is harsh.

Someone born in 1981 is a full 80s kid but someone born in 1983 is a full 90s kid? That's an oddly specific and short span.

File: 1477562639173.png (384KB, 722x887px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 722x887px

>>84651373
>full
Neither are pure. But you are more a 90s kid than a 80s kid if you are born in 83 and the other way around in 81.
There has to be a cutoff point somewhere.


Also I don't have Facebook or Twitter but I assume this will work for baiting them.

>>84650594
>>84651451

Perfect. Good job anon.

>>84651574
It was totally worth it to waste a few minutes making this if you make some faggots mad.

>spitballing generational bullshit

Fuck off

i dunno and i really dont give a shit about dumb kids

>>84648950
Oh please, try being a diaperfag.

>>84652086
Why don't you try not being one?

>>84652086
Why would you ever admit that? Even anonymously.

>>84650594
94 here, I can barely remember any of the shit I did or watched before I was 6. Not sure if I can really consider myself a 90s kid.

>>84654801
Well according to the chart you are not.