How was this film?
All I can find is yanks having race bait arguments and religious nuts crying about biblical inaccuracy
>All I can find is yanks having race bait arguments and religious nuts crying about biblical inaccuracy
and you thought you'd get objective criticism on fucking /tv/ of all places
>>84605233
Figured if I can get a thread with 20+ replies I'd have 2/3 about the film
>>84605202
I personally liked it alot.
It got bad (((((reviews))))), because it ironically equated the Hebrews incarceration and subsequent terrorism to the modern day Palestinian problem.
(((Hollywood))) didnt like it.
its average to bad
nothing special and not worth its budget, but watchable
>>84605202
It's not that bad but at times it felt too short and unfinished as a whole.
Characters would just randomly show up and never appear again like what happen to Sigourney weaver in the movie.
gods of egypt was the superior ancient egyptian kino
the female leads were both very qt
>>84605202
if it triggers bible-thumpers than you know it's good
>>84606721
This. I zoned out for about 2/3 of it. Not really worth arguing over. Unremarkable.
>>84606919
WUZ
>>84605202
>"Let mydubsgo!"
What did he mean by this?
>>84606930
WHITE
>>84606945
KANGZ AND SHEEIT
>>84606933
Oh shit
No doubt there is an amazing 4 hour cut of this but Ridley has said he's not releasing it ever so fuck it I'm never watching it.
it's a biblical epic that manages to somehow be boring as shit. and yet another scott project that obviously left too much on the cutting room floor. you're not missing anything
>>84606933
checked
>>84606933
fucking finally
Why does Hollywood even try to make more Exodus movies when Prince of Egypt exists?
>>84605202
It's shit
>>84606550
>because it ironically equated the Hebrews incarceration and subsequent terrorism to the modern day Palestinian problem.
What, how did you reach that conclusion?
>(((Hollywood))) didnt like it.
Then why did they fund it? Why did they distribute it? Why did they put top stars in it? Take a hike /pol/
>let's make a "realistic" movie and give rational explanations at stuff coming from the bible
lmoa
>>84606971
>Biblical epic
>When it tries to be as little Bible as possible
>>84606970
Maybe it will be release once he dies.
>>84606933
>>84606966
very nice
>>84606970
>>84607057
I doubt it. The only reason so many of his movies get director's cuts is because he would push them so hard. He was fed up with the studios always cutting his shit to shit and said fuck you, you want Exodus like this so this is what you're getting and doesn't ever want to go back to it.
>free your people from slavery
>immediately create a system of slavery
>>84607031
its based on a story from the bible so yes its a biblical epic, otherwise i agree with your point that this movies bizarre fixation on attributing "realism" to a story about gods wrath is fuckin ridiculous and actively hampers the movie.
watch noah instead, the superior old testament biblical epic of the last few years. its not without its problems but its better in pretty much every way than exodus
>>84605202
Movie gets points because they tell archers to "loose" and not "fire".
Crocodile mass-suicide was dope.
Nothing amazing overall, but didn't deserve so much hate. Biblical subject matter will do that to ya'.
>>84607217
Moses died before they got to Israel