>:what exactly ARE these things?!" >the camera cuts

i dont see any problem here OP, whats the issue?

OP what exactly are you impressed by? It's just basic editing.

>>84604555
Not the editing what Columbus is saying.

>>84604336
>>84604369
Is this autism?

>>84604336
they're suppose to be a representation of shifty little jew bankers.
is that your question?

>>84604670

Start making sense or start eating that trashcan!

>>84604753
>>84604803
Are you all new?

Mental illness the thread

what?

>>84604831

Yes, now tell us what you're talking about.

File: Star_of_David.svg.png (48KB, 1200x1385px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1200x1385px

>short greedy long-nosed monsters
>the biggest bank in wizarding Britbongia
>this floor design
what DID he mean by this?

>>84604928

Don't change the subject, I want to know what

>>84604336 and >>84604670 is about

>>84604964
There's a fucking jewish star in the center of gringotts that is all. Harry potter has raimiposting too.

I don't know what happened in this thread but I feel like I've been trolled.

File: 1483418897402.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

I can't believe it's the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises! Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: 1496353344663.png (148KB, 353x319px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 353x319px

>>84605192
oh you posted this in this thread too

>>84604928
The star on the floor doesn't look like that.

>>84606558
They are both six sided stars you tosspot. If you color in the star that's how it looks.

>>84604336
Hey an anon reposted my old thread