Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: blade_runner_xlg.jpg (265KB, 998x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
265KB, 998x1500px
>subpar acting
>awful pacing
>cringeworthy dialogue
>cliché and predictable pseudo-arthouse wankery
>full of visual motifs so unsubtle that a newborn baby could interpret them
>poorly executed noir tropes
>uninteresting forced romance
>Harrison Ford is horrifically miscast
Please explain why this is considered a brilliant masterpiece.
>>
File: 1430594114996.jpg (88KB, 1078x710px) Image search:
[Google]
88KB, 1078x710px
>>84552112
>pseudo-arthouse wankery
>poorly executed noir tropes
I bet you thought these sounded really cool
>>
It's really just about the atmosphere and the Russian dude. Or whatever he is.
>>
>>84552112
>a revolutionary movie from 80 years ago isn't as great when held to the same standards of today!
wow OP, great analysis
>>
>>84552218
>the Russian dude. Or whatever he is.
Replicant
>>
>>84552112
Pic unrelated
>>
it's about cyberpunk
>>
>>84552112
I SAW THE NEW RE-VIEW TOO!!
>>
>>84552112
>Influenced an entire genre of movies for decades to come
That's probably it
>>
File: Millennials.png (323KB, 1000x1523px) Image search:
[Google]
323KB, 1000x1523px
>>84552112
>released in 1982
>>
>>84552247
It wasn't even good 35 years ago.
>>
>>84552403
your parents weren't even old enough to remember it upon release, kys teenage retard
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3