Why's this board obsessed with ranking shows by their respective

>>84536659
>he hasn't seen True Detective season 2

>>84536684
TD is an exception since each season contains a different cast so they should be seen as each season is a new show

name 1 (one) long, or even medium running show that actually has consistent levels of quality throughout

it just doesn't happen faggot.

>>84536740
Csi miami

>>84536740
But that's exact my point. If one show has variations in quality they should be rated integrally

Why is this board obsessed with blacks?

>>84536659
It's because ranking seasons of television shows is the perfect synthesis of mindless analysis, narcissism, reductive argumentation, and shit stirring which the shills have learned long ago.

>>84536659
Are you daft? What you're suggesting is entirely dishonest.

Television shows aren't made by a single person. Episodes are directed and written by completely different people on an episode by episode basis. Shows do drop and rise (rarely) in quality because the writing and direction change over time. This problem is then compounded by the fact that shows are changed, renewed, or canceled, based on the whims of ratings.

You get around this problem by explicitly saying that XYZ seasons in XYZ show are good/bad. Part of looking at a show as one unit is looking at the individual seasons for what they are and understanding that the medium of television is very different to film in this respect.

>>84539157
If one show's 1st season is good and the second and third are mediocre I'd rate its integrity as mediocre
Rating each season separately seems to be justifying their mediocrity

>>84536659
why is this board obsessed with watching jews so much?

>>84539157
/thread

>>84536684
True. Season 2 was better than season 1.