>just marathon'd this flick >wanted to know what /tv/

>>84375032
It suffered that Nolan effect of being great it some aspect but shit in others

>>84375032

Rewatched a few times last week...Sundance TV...forgot how much of NASA propoganda this is. They keep spewing the "Relativity" junk (which has been debunked) as simple fact. Utter nonsense.

>>84375032
Visuals: 9/10

Soundtrack: 6/10

Story&writing: -12/10

>>84375032
terrible film

Dunkirk will be awful too.

File: 1114534545.jpg (34KB, 758x725px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 758x725px

>>84375032
Unironically in my top five
No bully

>>84375032
>every character speaks at a barely audible whisper
>every epic moment is so loud my entire room shakes

Watching this just kinda pissed me off

>>84376511
Yeah, the mixing is absolute shit. But that seems pretty standard for Nolan.

>>84375032
>flick
please go stick your head up a ducks asshole

>>84375032
Question: how do you "marathon" one fucking movie?

Are attention spans really that fucking short these days?

>>84375696
>relativity has been debunked

Seriously? When?

>>84376764
hello new summer 4chan user

its a maymay used for response

>>84377354
Still sounds fucking retarded. Makes anything ne singing the term wrong look like a See-You-Next -Tuesday.

>>84377597
why the fuck would you go on 4chan if you're going to act all flustered any time you don't understand the cancer?

>>84377597
Someone get this hothead outta here.

>>84376764
jesus fucking christ I can't believe people are still asking this unironically

>>84377706
Auto correct is a bitch after a few rounds of Moscow Mules.

>>84375032
Why can't Nolan write decent dialogue? It's fucking awful

>>84377777
nice quints

File: IMG_2327.jpg (38KB, 220x329px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 220x329px

>>84377717
You I like

>>84375032
It was a great movie that's comparable to Space Odyssey 2001, but let me guess, you hated that one too.

God tier sci fi. I don't care that it's not based in science fact (though god knows it's closer than most sci fi), but the fact that you're even *discussing* whether the science in it is correct, indicates that it's much more science based than most of the genre (most like alien, is so non-scientific, that there would be no question as to whether it's based in truth).

It's a very good movie. I would be inclined to say that if you don't like it, you're just a contrarian faggot that lashes out against anything that's popular.

>>84377743
getting that response is the only reason people do it

>>84375032
DUDE SPACE LIBRARY OF LOVE LAMFAO

>>84377777
DIGITS

File: IMG_2331.gif (1MB, 316x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 316x200px

>>84377839
This guy gets it.

>>84378021
dumb phoneposter

>>84377597
Please just leave and take your unwarranted hostility with you. You blew up like a fucking autist over something that is posted nearly everyday.

>dude how we gon get off Earth bro
>"I got it bro, let's just turn off gravity with an equation from the future and also the past and also love"
>great plan dude

>>84378120
He could swing around that neutron star

It's allegory for the story of Christianity you fucking shit lords.

The earth in the movie is life, everyone is doomed to die at the end and there is no escape. Rust Cohl sacrifices himself to save everyone else. The daughter is the church waiting for Jesus' return and the son is the Jewish people who rejected him. There's a bunch more in there but I'm hella tired

>>84378259
you sound hella tired, go to sleep

>>84376345

Good to see that we still have some true patricians left here.

File: Sunshine.jpg (9KB, 185x272px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 185x272px

It's spacekino

>>84376345
same, don't let the haters get you down

>>84376345
>>84376617
>>84376764
>>84377597
>>84377743
>>84377806
>>84377847
>>84378259
>>84378354
>>84378377
>>84378450
you have to go back

>>84378795
this

>>84375032
no it is pretty great, probably one of nolan's best. Interestingly this movie seems to divide people in two groups. I kinda want to ask OP why he thinks it was shit but i already know the answers.
We had this "discussion" a million times

>>84378259
Don't you dare unironically try and post an analysis for this normie-tier 3 year old movie, everything and anything worth saying about it was trodden to death in the first six months