Can /tv/ recommend other movies about billionaires abusing their

>>84254634

>out a billionaire as gay when he didnt want outing
>outing him while he's on a business trip to Saudi Arabia of all places
>Get upset when he'd take any chance to shut you down

File: 1471654378106.png (383KB, 931x1234px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 931x1234px

>>84254695
It's called Journalism faggot.

>>84254754

gawker was a blogging website at best

>>84254820
So the first amendment doesn't apply to bloggers?

>>84254754
>Journalism
>Gawker

>>84254859

well its not journalism, its blogging

It was a hit piece. You have to recognize you're not protected by the first amendment when you openly bully people.

>>84254911
Exactly, so they have no first amendment rights.

>>84254952

if you say so

>>84254634
gawker had it coming. Also bait.

>>84254995
>It's fake news

Spotted the Trump supporter.

File: 1497790828106.jpg (172KB, 1080x1076px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1080x1076px

Reminder that Hulk was cucking his close friend. The cuckold secretly filmed the act and sold it to media companies.

Around cucks never fucks

>thiel's palantir funded by the cia
>backing multiple lawsuits that are shakier than the hogan tape simply to bury outlets in legal fees
>vegas mogul with ties to foreign governments buys local paper, can pressure them not to publish things he simply doesn't like

why is this ok, /tv/?

>>84254634
>Judge tells you to take down video
>No
>You're being sued, please pay 31 mil
>Wtf

News should report news and not slander or private info

File: 1495779165993.png (253KB, 449x496px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 449x496px

>>84254754
>why did they not just take the sextape down when ordered?
>why did they joke about a 4 yr old sextape to the court?

>>84255015
>maybe If I reply to every post in my thread with bait I'll get some (you)'s

wew lad. slow day?

File: 1471915021335.jpg (635KB, 1438x1968px) Image search: [Google]

635KB, 1438x1968px

>>84255065
What did they mean by this?

File: bubba-the-love-sponge.jpg (29KB, 200x294px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 200x294px

>>84255035
>cucking his close friend
His name is Bubba the Love Sponge btw

>>84255113
>Journalism

>>84254754
So journalism is talking about the sexuality of Sylicon Valley bussines men and what a famous wrestler says after fucking?

>>84254754
Journalism isn't a special card that let's you invade peoples privacy.

The Hogan trial more than anything proves this.

>Start watching
>Instantly starts showing Trump supporters
>"There's a lot to be gained by trying to discredit the mainstream media"

Holy shit this is bad.

Democracy Dies In The Dark

-- Washington Post

It's our right to watch secretly recorded sex tapes of celebrities.

Don't release politicians work emails, though. That's wrong and probably treasonous.

File: classicdoncherry.jpg (82KB, 1431x1061px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1431x1061px

>>84254634
If they are implying that billionaires are taking down Journalism. Then who is behind this documentary?

File: 1491361909601.png (17KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 650x650px

>The trial between Hulk Hogan and Gawker Media pitted privacy rights against freedom of the press, and raised important questions about how big money can silence media. This film is an examination of the perils and duties of the free press in an age of inequality.
LMAO
>MUH FREEDOM OF PRESS SEEING AN EX WRESTLER'S 50 YEAR OLD ASS IS IMPORTANT NEWS

File: worstpossible.gif (3KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 200x200px

Gawker did everything you could possibly do wrong when facing a lawsuit. It will be a case studied years from now in law schools because of Gawker's staggering incompetence.

>Gawker gives a legal deposition.jpeg

>>84255047
muh 80s cuckold wrestling idol

>>84255361
>admitting under oath that you would publish the sex tape of a 6 year old

What were they thinking?

>>84255047
Mexican billionaire buys New York Times to influence US social, economic and immigration policies.

Why is this Okay?

Amazon.com owner and billionaire buys Washington Post to influence domestic US politics in his favor. He also has a $600,000,000 contract with CIA whom his paper is supposed to cover.

How is this okay?

>>84255361

>fuck up so badly the judge increases damages

>>84255113
What pieces of shit, glad they got btfo

I have rarely seen a more biased piece of garbage. How the hell can they pretend Gawker were victims here?

>Flip your shit about Jlaw leaks
>Immediately publish hogan sextape
>He asks you twice to take it down
>Mock and laugh at his requests while you preen and virtue signal
>Hogan gets a massive cash backing from someone who you previously fucked over
>Be so drunk on your own arrogance and self-righteous hypocrisy that you actually go to court with it
>Act like teenage faggots in court, maintain your smugness, continue to totally disregard your own hypocrisy and lack of ethics
>Get absolutely REKT
>WAAAAAH, MUH JOURNALISTIC FREEDOM

Freedom of the press does not equate to freedom to do what the fuck you like. If they were in the right, the case would have fallen flat. And if they dropped hogans tape he'd not have been the front man for the big money queer that absolutely orbitally ass shattered them.

>gawker

>people

actually make that

>"journalists"

>people

If Hogan hadn't fucked them then Conde Naste would have. They were doomed no matter what.

You've Been Trumped
You've Been Trumped Too

They're about him fucking over Scottish homeowners

>>84255096
Lmao, BTFO

>Bullying and influencing the press is bad
>Well, except when the liberal people we like are doing it