>King.Arthur.Legend.of.the.Sword.2017.1080p.KORSUB.HDRip.x264.AAC2.0-STUTTERSHIT
So what's the general consensus on this?
>>84241746
Only a dog eating retard would watch KORSUBshit
>>84241746
>KORSUB
'no'
>>84241746
kino or game cannot decide
though I liked this medieval shit in snatch format
Ok, the guy ritchie style did not fit tbqh
>>84241746
It's pretty fucking enjoyable, especially if you like Ritchie and aren't hung up on Arthurian accuracy.
JESUS CHRIST
>>84241746
I was pleasantly surprised. It started out poorly, but then we hit the first montage and from there onwards it was great until the final fight which was shit
>>84241746
0/10 they never discussed King Arthur's tax policy.
KINO soundtrack
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGnfFW-vyzU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2LLS33eQvk
People had to high of expectations for this. Once I saw Ritchie's name attached, I knew I was in for a treat. I think some thought it was going to "rival" Excalibur.
Any yify links out yet?
>>84241746
It's almost enjoyable but with an enormous flaw, it's severely disjointed
>>84241746
Guy Ritchie has been shite for years
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uu8VpSqDJtc
Anyone who didn't love this scene needs to fuck off /tv/ immediately
>It was supposed to be one of the summer’s biggest blockbusters – a gritty reimagining of the Arthurian legend, boasting big-budget special effects, a rising Hollywood star in British actor Charlie Hunnam and a big-name director in Guy Ritchie. But King Arthur: Legend of the Sword has instead become one of the year’s biggest flops after a disastrous opening weekend at the global box office.
B-but the diversity....
>>84241746
>1080p.KORSUB.HDRip
Why is this allowed?
Why this movei flopped? It's because of the white protag? No stronk female leads?
>>84244150
marketing was atrocious
it wasn't clear who it was aimed at
they should have halved the budget (at minimum, if not reduce it further) and gone for a 15/r rating
alas
King Arthur, I'm Round Table.
>>84244269
>mfw his name was actually Goosefat Bill
Ritchie knows
>>84242434
Underrated
>Charlie Hunnam was emaciated and had lost twenty pounds for the last season of Sons of Anarchy (2008). During auditions, director Guy Ritchie was very bothered by his look, though he liked his performance, and asked him four times during the process about his poor physique and what was the heaviest he had been. Hunnam said that when Ritchie brought up the fourth time, he knew that the physicality of Arthur was very important to Ritchie. He promised him that he would get into incredible shape for Arthur and to prove his fitness for the part and even offered to physically fight the other two finalists, Henry Cavill and Jai Courtney.
>Hunnam told Ritchie, "Look, dude, you keep bringing this up, the physicality. It's obviously your primary concern. So if you want to do away with all this auditioning bollocks, I'll f***ing fight those other two dudes. I know who they are. You can bring them both in here. I'll fight them both. The one who walks out the door gets the job." Hunnam won the role after this.
budget: +175M
marketing: +100M
income: -138M
>>84244471
it should've been Henry
>>84245578
I agree Hunnam should be restricted to TV only and even then he still is subpar
If you like Guy Ritchie movies, you'll love this. If not, then you won't.
>>84241746
i dont need to watch it to know it's 100% absolute total shit
Why do they think putting niggers in medieval movies is a good idea? It will only drive people away from the movie.
>>84246037
The movie did not fail because black people were in it so stop whining about it. It failed because it fucking sucked and people just aren't interested in historical movies, fantasy or otherwise, if it doesn't have internal combustion engines or smartphones forget it
>>84245611
Except he was great in this. The only film where I liked him as the lead.
>>84246037
I hate when they do that
>>84246217
Sycophantic bootlicker
>>84245424
> Man from U.N.C.L.E: ~50 million loss
> King Arthur: ~150 million loss
Is Guy Ritchie finished after this?
>>84246176
Personally, I wanted to go see the movie because I always liked history movies, plus, it was a movie about king Arthur, but I dropped it when I saw a black knight in the trailer.
>>84246295
Did you somehow miss the part where it was directed by Guy Ritchie?
>>84241773
Considering the shit that is the movie, I don`t see why not.
>>84244239
>marketing was atrocious
>Not butchering King Arthur`s story with political correctness.
Righta
We Wuz
https://youtu.be/olqPODTcRHI
>>84243837
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJewbFZHI34
Guy Ritchie is always fun and this was no exception. Fuck knows what his Aladdin will be like.
>>84241746
this flick is trash and edited by a an autismo
>>84246956
>i wanna be black
always gets me
>>84246669
WE WUZ KNIGHTS N ISREALITES
>>84246273
I hope not. I enjoyed both those films.
>>84241746
UTTER shit. Doesn't work as an action flick, doesn't work as a fantasy flick, certainly doesn't work as an historical flick. No-one wanted this shit, I hope everyone involved dies of aids within the week.
Wtf was that darkland sequence
>implying modern audiences recognize a director
Spielberg could release an action-adventure movie tomorrow and it would flop unless it was a known franchise.
>>84246037
Fuck off. Here is a list of niggers i dont care about.
>space niggers
>deep space niggers
>Medieval niggers
>Subterranean niggers
>niggers from another dimension
>tv niggers
>movie niggers
>cosplay niggers
>porn niggers
>jesus niggers
>egyptian pharaoh niggers
>underwater mermaid niggers
>nigger God
>nigger Jesus
The only niggers that concern me are my next door neighbour niggers. So shut the fuck up with this racist bs.
>>84241773
Indeed, not only the korean subs are annoying but there's worse, it's always very badly encoded. Even if it's 1080p, it's actually crap that has some offset parasite and looks upscaled
>>84242293
It was perfect, the only downside to this movie is the generic story and the plot holes
>>84250228
nigger God was funny desu