http://ew.com/movies/2017/06/21/blade-runner-2049-footage-exclusive/
Where were you when Denis singlehandedly saved Hollywood cinema?
>>84144907
I was taking a rather satisfying shit when I heard. Needless to say my remaining dumps were all the sweeter.
is it going to be his first good movie bros??
well I'm not going to watch it anyway so I'll trust your opinion!
>>84145107
>is it going to be his first good movie bros??
>first
>>84145107
Remember when shitposters like this goof were the norm when Sicario came out? So many contrarian snowflakes. Villeneuve is on his way to becoming a GOAT and there's nothing your bitter shitposting can do about it.
>>84144907
I never doubted him for a second. Feels good. Can't wait for butthurt plebs to complain that the film was boring or that being too stupid to understand the story makes the film bad
It already looks beautiful so I'm sure it's gonna be good
>>84145234
of course it's contrarians, your meme director can't be possibly bad in my personal opinion! keep crying, and watch some more film if you can!
>>84145366
uh huh
>>84145107
>>84145366
What don't you like about him? It would help if you can be specific by referencing particular examples in his movies to support your opinion.
A trashy meme flick by a trashmaster meme director that gets the reddit sensibilities tingling?
I can already see this trash at the top 10 lists of all the little plebs here that think they have taste
>>84145107
>>84145366
>>84145641
>>84145689
At least those dummies are bumping the thread. Denis wins in the end!
>>84145719
>videogame player is a fan of denis 'imdb' villeneuve
fucking hell it just writes itself
>>84145769
riiiiiight
>>84144907
The most pointless sequels in history general?
>>84145823
How was your gaem of league, /v/ro
git hype
no salt
twitchy for lifey
>>84145892
try again without memes
Denis looks like a mix between that one porn star and Timothy Dalton. hell of a director though
>>84145842
>original film is the most iconic cyberpunk film ever made, illustrating a potential future LA that has succumb to pollution and extreme crime - very much reflecting real-world fears of the future in the 80s
>there's no reason to do the same thing again but with contemporary fears of the future
you're an idiot
>>84145892
someone is projecting
>>84145842
So the excellently ambiguous ending that Ridley crafted for the Director's Cut is blown completely away making the happy-sappy-ride-into-the-sunset on of the theatrical release canon?
Seriously, the guy should not be let near any of his old movies, that's two classic franchises he's ruined in five years.
>>84146117
Don't count your chickens just yet, lad. You may end up liking the greater story of the two arcs more than just the ambiguity of BR1.
>>84145979
>original film was extremely ambiguous leaving lot of things to imagination
2 solutions
>make an original new cyberpunk movie reflecting real-world fears of today
>milk an old cult classic for easy money
you´re one of the enablers of this nostalgia milking
I loved the voice overs and I always watch the fan cut that adds them in and removes the unicorn.
>>84146376
a more pleb opinion was never given voice
............ I run
>>84146415
Why? Deckard is not replicant in the book. Dick said so himself. I find it much more powerful that way.
>"The purpose of this story as I saw it was that in his work of hunting and killing these replicants, Deckard becomes progressively dehumanized. At the same time, the replicants are being perceived as becoming more human. Finally, Deckard must question what he is doing, and really what is the essential difference between him and them? And, to take it one step further, who is he if there is no real difference?"
Said Dick himself
>>84144907
>it was like walking on a knife's edge.
>>84146560
great adaptations are never a 1:1 translation of words to screen. using the author's intent to invalidate Ridley's is a pleb move
>>84146560
>muh author muh word of god
Fuck off simpleton
>>84146681
It is not about translation of words but the themes. Deckard being a replicant cheapens the grander message.
>Where are we going
>*pause for dramatic effect*
>HOME DUN DUN CRESCENDO
>>84146790
That's fair. I'm just busting your balls, anyway. As long as you like Blade Runner, you're alright by me, anon.
I'm about due for a rewatch. I've only seen it once and I watched the DC. I could've sworn Deckard's nature was left ambiguous, though.
>>84146858
It was implied heavily in certain cuts that he is a replicant. And Scott said himself in one interview.
>>84144907
>denis directing
>gosling staring
>deakins dp'ing
this shit is gonna be amazing
>dennis "reddit plebs discover cinematography for the first time" villeneuve
Villenueve is Nolan 2.0 Edgy pleb shit for manchildren. BR 2 will be a disgrace.
>>84146202
Fuck off shill
>>84147391
fuck off h8r
>>84147353
This is a terrible opinion and you should consider necking yourself for holding it
>>84144907
will watch for ana de armas
>>84149047
why is her face so small
Looks like it's going to be filled with 2deep4u symbolism shots. Ryan Gosling was a shit pick too. With that being said it looks better than I thought I would.